|
07-21-2011, 01:38 PM | ||
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $4540478
|
Kim Kardashian should be on your shit list.
What a dumb bitch.
http://news-briefs.ew.com/2011/07/21...sues-old-navy/ Quote:
|
|
Posts: 278,409
|
06-28-2013, 03:52 PM | #91 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
It's the same exact reason why you don't see a "Look-A-Like" or George Clooney impersonator in a Mercedes campaign or a Brad Pitt impersonator in a condom or fragrance campaign. It's an I.P. infringement and it's illegal. And The GAP knew exactly what they were doing, which is why they settled out of court. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 03:53 PM | #92 |
Wearing ballistic dog goggles.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the box.
Casino cash: $5131503
|
If the Gap commercial/ad, or WTF ever we’re talking about, somehow hinted that she is KK then I can see the point. Otherwise this suit will get laughed out of court.
__________________
Like "Cool Hand" Luke I'm busting rocks. __/|_/[___] |/ \\_| ---OllllO _( ))~-( ))-0--)) |
Posts: 25,243
|
06-28-2013, 03:55 PM | #93 | ||
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $10004995
|
Quote:
Quote:
They settled because IP law and courts that handle them is so horrendously ****ing broken that they'd probably spend years dealing with a trial over this and it could set a precedent that could **** them over in the future. Cheaper and easier for them to just throw some money at this wannabe failed pornstar. |
||
Posts: 252
|
06-28-2013, 03:55 PM | #94 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Yes.
As I explained in the previous post, you cannot legally hire a celebrity impersonator to endorse a product. In many cases, you can't hire a celebrity voice impersonator. Haven't you guys ever heard the disclaimer "Celebrity voices impersonated"? |
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 03:57 PM | #95 | |||
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Regardless of your feelings about Kardashian, the same rules apply to everyone. |
|||
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM | #96 | |
Wearing ballistic dog goggles.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the box.
Casino cash: $5131503
|
Quote:
__________________
Like "Cool Hand" Luke I'm busting rocks. __/|_/[___] |/ \\_| ---OllllO _( ))~-( ))-0--)) |
|
Posts: 25,243
|
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM | #97 | |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2108919
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Posts: 47,602
|
06-28-2013, 03:58 PM | #98 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM | #99 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM | #100 |
"Think BOOM!"
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 33.675° N 106.475° W
Casino cash: $10189900
VARSITY
|
Huh. I guess the "intellectual" part was and is throwing me.
__________________
I think the young people enjoy it when I "get down," verbally, don't you? |
Posts: 181,151
|
06-28-2013, 03:59 PM | #101 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 04:00 PM | #102 |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10005155
|
|
Posts: 576
|
06-28-2013, 04:01 PM | #103 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM | #104 |
Wearing ballistic dog goggles.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the box.
Casino cash: $5131503
|
Dur, I didn’t even look at the date. Topic posted July 2011.
Now why do I give a shit? Oh wait, don’t. Have a good weekend.
__________________
Like "Cool Hand" Luke I'm busting rocks. __/|_/[___] |/ \\_| ---OllllO _( ))~-( ))-0--)) |
Posts: 25,243
|
06-28-2013, 04:02 PM | #105 | |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $4144563
|
Quote:
And is that this girl's schtick? A Celebrity Impersonator? Or is she simply just a model that happened to look like Kim K? Is she running around trying to be Kim K? If not, then that's a bullshit law. Like i said, this isn't movies or music. This is someone's face. They didn't choose to be born that way, and she shouldn't have to take a back seat to some other woman simply because that woman "claimed that face" first. If you wanna argue I.P rights on stuff like music, movies or anything else that is designed by someone, fine. But a face? Really? That's silly. |
|
Posts: 64,437
|
|
|