|
|
05-05-2014, 06:40 PM | #1 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7712645
|
Quote:
You go with your gut and pick the one you think is the best. If you've got a problem with a 5'9 WR making 100+ catches a year because you could have got a 6'4 guy that makes a living on a catch that didn't count then you've got ****ing issues. Last edited by jd1020; 05-05-2014 at 06:48 PM.. |
|
Posts: 24,332
|
05-05-2014, 07:30 PM | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
|
reposting since its relevant.
http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...d-b286b23bbb55 Quote:
Here is a list of the top 20 regular season WR of 2013 by receiving yrds: only 4 are under 6' tall. I am sure Dorsey noticed that too. Last edited by planetdoc; 05-05-2014 at 07:38 PM.. |
|
Posts: 2,174
|
05-05-2014, 07:54 PM | #3 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7712645
|
|
Posts: 24,332
|
05-05-2014, 08:01 PM | #4 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
|
|
Posts: 2,174
|
05-05-2014, 07:32 PM | #5 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
Quote:
Andre Johnson AJ Green Julio Jones Brandon Marshall Alshon Jeffrey Josh Gordon Larry Fitzgerald Dez Bryant Demaryius Thomas Vincent Jackson These guys all have the ability to dominate in the red zone, short, intermediate, or deep because of their size, strength, flexibility, focus, and great catch radius. Small guys like Desean Jackson and Mike Wallace, who have all of the speed and quickness in the world, might as well not be on the field in the Red Zone. I'd rather have a slower Alshon Jeffrey/Brandon Marshall who can catch everything thrown their way over a tiny guy who would be virtually useless in the red zone and actually limits what you can do down there if they are on the field. |
|
Posts: 12,727
|
05-05-2014, 07:49 PM | #6 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7712645
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 24,332
|
05-05-2014, 08:17 PM | #7 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2013
Casino cash: $10035212
|
How many successful WRs out there that were true #1 targets and stood under 5'10", which Brandin Cooks does, in the recent history of the NFL (past 30 years)? Only one I can think of is Steve Smith.
Wes Welker has always had someone better playing around him (Moss, Gronk, Hernandez, D. Thomas, J. Thomas) Maybe Desean Jackson? He's too inconsistent to be a true #1, IMO. He's either big splash or long stretches of nothing in games. More of a specialist like Mike Wallace. Now, tell my how many great WRs in the recent history (past 30 years) of the NFL stood at or over 6'1" (my cut off for the #1 WR minimum height)? Take a guess at which list is a hell of a lot longer. Last edited by OldSchool; 05-05-2014 at 08:23 PM.. |
Posts: 12,727
|
05-05-2014, 08:52 PM | #8 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7712645
|
Quote:
I realize, however, that they are a bunch of imbeciles on this board that refuse to believe a guy that put up #1 numbers with absolute shit throwing him the ball is a #1 WR, but this team needs a compliment to Bowe, not another ****ing Bowe. Can you imagine how unbearable it would be if the Chiefs had selected the under 6'1 receiver named Torrey Smith instead of Jonathan Baldwin? OH THE ****ING HORROR!!!!!!! Last edited by jd1020; 05-05-2014 at 08:58 PM.. |
|
Posts: 24,332
|
05-05-2014, 08:58 PM | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $9995865
|
Quote:
Bowe will be 30 yrs old by the start of the season, and has a cap # of $12 million this yr, and $14 million in 2015. That is a lot for a guy with 673 regular season receiving yrds in 2013. |
|
Posts: 2,174
|
05-05-2014, 08:59 PM | #10 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7712645
|
Quote:
And Bowe isn't going anywhere so you might as well get used to him being on the team. |
|
Posts: 24,332
|
|
|