As of right now, cdcox's software says the team most likely to win the Super Bowl...

[TEX]

Originally Posted by SNR

I'll judge him when he has to build a team post-Manning.

Is he going to pull another rabbit out of his hat? Is he going to sign Tom Brady after the Patriots refuse to keep him around after awhile? What?

Assweiler isn't the solution, so what is it?

Who cares, judge him how you want. The fact of the matter is Denver was in shambles 2 years ago and now they are Super Bowl contenders. They're doing something right. To not acknowledge what they've been able to do in a short time is foolish. I tip my hat to them, and only wish the Chiefs could be as good.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by TEX

Who cares, judge him how you want. The fact of the matter is Denver was in shambles 2 years ago and now they are Super Bowl contenders. They're doing something rigjt. Do not acknowledge but they've been able to do any short time is foolish. I tip my hat to them, and only wish the Chiefs QB is good.

Q: What's better than a franchise QB leading your team at the end of his career?

A: A franchise QB leading your team at the BEGINNING of his career

It may seem bleak now, but one day we'll have the QB, and they'll have the Matt Cassel game manager because "there were no options in the draft at the time" or whatever excuse they come up with

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by SNR

Q: What's better than a franchise QB leading your team at the end of his career?

A: A franchise QB leading your team at the BEGINNING of his career

Yep, in today's NFL there is nothing better. You are a guaranteed playoff contender every year no matter how bad the rest of your team is. You put a little talent around him on O or D and you're in the running for a championship.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by SNR

Q: What's better than a franchise QB leading your team at the end of his career?

A: A franchise QB leading your team at the BEGINNING of his career

It may seem bleak now, but one day we'll have the QB, and they'll have the Matt Cassel game manager because "there were no options in the draft at the time" or whatever excuse they come up with

Oh that's 1 way to look at it. But also they did with it took to win now. they also did not mortgage the future doing so. They could get a young franchise QB. Nobody says you have to draft 1. The Packers did pretty darn good when they traded for Favre. They already had their Matt Cassel. They letting go to New York.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by TEX

Who cares, judge him how you want. The fact of the matter is Denver was in shambles 2 years ago and now they are Super Bowl contenders. They're doing something right. To not acknowledge what they've been able to do in a short time is foolish. I tip my hat to them, and only wish the Chiefs could be as good.

There's no mystery about this. JFC.

They signed Peyton Manning and they're a contender.

Pretty ****ing simple.

[Garcia Bronco]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There's no mystery about this. JFC.

They signed Peyton Manning and they're a contender.

Pretty ****ing simple.

The team has made a number of move to put themselves in position. If I had to put a number on it I'd say 60 percent Manning. Remember though this team won a playoff game with Tim Tebow, that means we have an excellent defense.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

The team has made a number of move to put themselves in position. If I had to put a number on it I'd say 60 percent Manning. Remember though this team won a playoff game with Tim Tebow, that means we have an excellent defense.

Lots of teams win a single playoff game, even with shit QBs.

This team was a 9-7 one-and-doner without Manning, now they're a SB contender.

No ****ing mystery at all.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Lots of teams win a single playoff game, even with shit QBs.

This team was a 9-7 one-and-doner without Manning, now they're a SB contender.

No ****ing mystery at all.

The term "one and done" refers to a team that loses its first playoff game and is then out of the playoffs after one game. Being a Chiefs fan, I'm sure you're familiar with the situation.

That term does not apply to the 2011 Broncos, as they won a playoff game and played in two playoff games. You could say they were two and done, but that would be stupid.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by MagicHef

The term "one and done" refers to a team that loses its first playoff game and is then out of the playoffs after one game. Being a Chiefs fan, I'm sure you're familiar with the situation.

That term does not apply to the 2011 Broncos, as they won a playoff game and played in two playoff games. You could say they were two and done, but that would be stupid.

I wasn't referring to last year's team as a 1-and-done team.

They would have been without Tebow.

[MagicHef]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I wasn't referring to last year's team as a 1-and-done team.

They would have been without Tebow.

Aha, I see.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

The team has made a number of move to put themselves in position. If I had to put a number on it I'd say 60 percent Manning. Remember though this team won a playoff game with Tim Tebow, that means we have an excellent defense.

60??