Home Discord Chat
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > Nzoner's Game Room > Fantasy/CasinoPlanet
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2013, 04:30 AM   #1
ChiefGator ChiefGator is offline
Can these boys not play?
 
ChiefGator's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Northcentral Florida
Casino cash: $7632956
I have an embarrassment of riches at the RB position (Charles, Spiller, Bush, and Miller in a 1/2 ppr) and only Greg Olsen as TE.

Would you consider this a good trade:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Witten (+ Fasano)?

I already offered to someone else:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Gronkowski (+ some scrub), which I don't expect to happen in preseason. Maybe once Lamar proves some people wrong and if Olsen has a good start to the season.

I'm really set at QB, WR, and RB, but want to improve my TE. Or is the non-sexy Greg Olsen better than any of those offers?

(Oh, we only start 2 RB's with an open-flex position which will be occupied by my 2nd QB)
__________________
- Mark
Posts: 4,597
ChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliChiefGator 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
    Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2013, 09:49 AM   #2
AndChiefs AndChiefs is offline
Bazinga!
 
AndChiefs's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Casino cash: $1471820
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefGator View Post
I have an embarrassment of riches at the RB position (Charles, Spiller, Bush, and Miller in a 1/2 ppr) and only Greg Olsen as TE.

Would you consider this a good trade:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Witten (+ Fasano)?

I already offered to someone else:

Greg Olsen + Lamar Miller for Gronkowski (+ some scrub), which I don't expect to happen in preseason. Maybe once Lamar proves some people wrong and if Olsen has a good start to the season.

I'm really set at QB, WR, and RB, but want to improve my TE. Or is the non-sexy Greg Olsen better than any of those offers?

(Oh, we only start 2 RB's with an open-flex position which will be occupied by my 2nd QB)
I'd take that Witten deal in a heartbeat. Two RB's with a good backup in a PPR league should be plenty. You're looking at an extra 40-50 receptions from Witten over Olsen.
__________________
Posts: 5,479
AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.AndChiefs Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
    Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2013, 10:42 AM   #3
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $6837901
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndChiefs View Post
I'd take that Witten deal in a heartbeat. Two RB's with a good backup in a PPR league should be plenty. You're looking at an extra 40-50 receptions from Witten over Olsen.
AGREED. DO IT NOW !!!

Witten is Romo's BINKY at all times and rarely gets hurt. Hell he came back last year before he was actually ready and still produced. Tough as hell.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud View Post
but I'll really need to think before speaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat View Post
I can't ****ing wait to see this dudes meat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties View Post
i think my favorite post in the thread is me
Posts: 27,003
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2013, 10:39 AM   #4
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $6837901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewbies View Post
Standard league, I was offered Bowe for Reggie Wayne. Leaning toward taking it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndChiefs View Post
I think I'd take it as well. I know Wayne surged again last year but he's old and bound to regress. Smith doesn't have a whole lot of targets available.
I get your thinking here BUT Wayne will still out produce Bowe IMO because Smith won't have an O-line to protect him because our interior O-line sucks and Bowe goes back to his ADD hands this year IMHO. Luck is still young and he will still rely on that great chemistry he has with Wayne and I see Luck being a top 5 fantasy QB this year !!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud View Post
but I'll really need to think before speaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat View Post
I can't ****ing wait to see this dudes meat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties View Post
i think my favorite post in the thread is me
Posts: 27,003
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2013, 10:57 AM   #5
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Replaced by a future HOFer !!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $6837901
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefGator View Post
I have an embarrassment of riches at the RB position (Charles, Spiller, Bush, and Miller in a 1/2 ppr)
At the beginning of every season everyone's team seems very salty because it is on paper. Paper and reality are two different worlds. Not trying to be a Debbie Downer here with all due respect but.....

1. Our interior O-line better get better quickly IF Charles is to have a good to great year. Initially he will only be good out of the backfield and at the WR/Slot positions IMHO and then once opposing D's realize our interior O-line sucks they will start to game for Charles out of the backfield/slot positions and take that away as well.

2. Spiller - injury risk, inconsistent and he plays for the Bills who have QB drama going on which means teams will stack the box until their QB play gets better.

3. Bush - HIGH injury risk and plays behind an O-line that is just about as bad as our interior O-line which means teams will do the same to the Dolphins as they do to the Chiefs. See point 1.

4. Miller - see point 1 without the injury risk.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud View Post
but I'll really need to think before speaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat View Post
I can't ****ing wait to see this dudes meat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties View Post
i think my favorite post in the thread is me
Posts: 27,003
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.