A mock draft that will make your heads explode

[NJChiefsFan]

Man your memory of what QB's were "locks" going into past drafts is pretty poor. Stop being so ****ing afraid of drafting a QB. You need to take a chance. You can't win without a QB. Go ahead and try to improve the team and ignore the QB position and enjoy not winning a SB. Do you watch the NFL?

[SAUTO]

Lol DJ has won 2 or 3 games for us?



wow, just wow.
Posted via Mobile Device

[NJChiefsFan]

You don't win a SB without a QB plan an simple. You obviously need other players but you don't ****ing start with them. Every team that has fails. You keep talking about things that are flawed, the entire argument that a player that is clear cut best at his position should be taken over another where its debatable is a complete joke.

[Mother****erJones]

We have to take a QB no 1. Whoever is the best prospect at QB take him. But it doesnt matter unless Pioli is gone

[Molitoth]

A big reason this defense sucked, is because our secondary got torched, we were alright against the run this year, but our pass defense was pretty bad. I mean Travis Daniels and Jalil Brown? Really? We weren't even getting beat by the opposing team's QB's, if we played Croyle each week, he'd probably have had 9-10 wins without blinking.

Letting Carr go for Routt, then cutting Routt and having no legitimate depth behind them was DUMB, but that is another argument for another thread.

Yeah we agree here. After qb, we need a cb and safety if bowe and Albert stay.

[NJChiefsFan]

Originally Posted by Molitoth

Yeah we agree here. After qb, we need a cb and safety if bowe and Albert stay.

Yes. But the gap for anything after QB is big. Drafting a LB before QB or CB is a complete joke.

[Hootie]

It's fascinating to me that people get paid to write and haven't realized that with the new rookie pay scale a QB is going to go #1 overall 9.5 times out of 10...and that other 0.5 times is for when an Adrian Peterson or Calvin Johnson is in the draft (which isn't available this year).

Yes, the rookie pay scale is even friendlier to RB's since you don't have to give a McFadden $40M anymore...you can get a guy at #5 and pay $16M or something totally reasonable

BUT YES...$25M is A LOT for an ILB...it is Kyle Orton for QB's. A QB is going #1 in this draft no matter what.

anyone mocking anything else is an idiot...

[Thig Lyfe]

let's trade our #1 pick to Jason Whitlock for Jeff George

[Molitoth]

I do watch the NFL, I was all for going after Peyton Manning and drafting a project QB last year, was all for Drafting Mallet the year before, and we didn't, was happy to draft Stanzi in the fifth,

.

Same.

Go watch a bunch of Geno tape, I think you can be converted.

[Hootie]

I'd rather take a punter #1 overall than an ILB.

Wasting a #1 on a OT, DL, ILB...****ing STUPID.

Take a QB, take a WR, take a RB, take a stud ****ing rush backer...NOTHING else is worth it...and if Matty Quinsell is your god damn QB you take the best GD QB in the draft and pat yourself on the back.

[tk13]

We don't even know if we're going to be a 4-3 or 3-4 team next year yet.

[Hootie]

does Teo run a 4.2 40? Can he rep 225 60 times? Does he have a 60" vertical and what will his Wonderlic be? 48?

If he's all those things...then I think I'd probably

draft Geno

[tooge]

The only way I'm fine with not using #1 on a QB is if there is a trade partner that keeps us in the top 10 and gives us another 2nd. Then we still get one of the top
3 QBs in all likely hood, could trade our 3rd for a Flynn or Cousins type guy and use the two seconds on CB, WR, or LB combo.

Of course, that would require a trade partner and I
Don't see
It happening for the talent that's up
In the top
This year

[Dave Lane]

Originally Posted by tooge

The only way I'm fine with not using #1 on a QB is if there is a trade partner that keeps us in the top 10 and gives us another 2nd. Then we still get one of the top
3 QBs in all likely hood, could trade our 3rd for a Flynn or Cousins type guy and use the two seconds on CB, WR, or LB combo.

Of course, that would require a trade partner and I
Don't see
It happening for the talent that's up
In the top
This year

Don't huff the nitrous oxide, it can be bad for you long term. Or at least let it wear off before you post.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Don't huff the nitrous oxide, it can be bad for you long term. Or at least let it wear off before you post.

Crazier things have happened. As it sits right now, trading out of the #1 spot is getting quite a bit of speculation from the talking heads and I don't really blame them. Unless a QB separates himself in this draft class, we can get the same "product" in the late first or even early 2nd round, as we would with the #1 pick, which is why I'm playing devils advocate and voicing the fact that I wouldn't be opposed to drafting Te'O if he happens to be the golden goose of this draft class. Hell, it makes no sense to waste the #1 selection on a QB that will produce the same play as a guy selected in the 30's.

All it does is allow the whiners their chance to revel in the fact that we finally made a QB selection in the first round after all of the years, and in 2-3 years we can come back here and start with the "What were we thinking? QB X was there in the 3rd round, why did we draft Geno/Matt/Tyler?".

And oh boy, with this draft class, I cannot wait for that day to come.