Bronco's Rat Shanahan worked out Steve Bono on Tuesday - Page 4

ROBHONDA · 09-27-2000, 07:55 AM

Its true, go into the Denver Post bronco sight. If Griese does not pass his throwing test TODAY/Wednesday, Shanahan will sign BONO
to a contract for back up.........

HARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR HARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
you've got to be kidding ME ?????!!!

ITS TRUE.

------------------
Chiefs Rock

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 12:22 PM

You did say it and I'm not going to go back through hundreds of posts to try and find it.

You're the coward for not admitting it.

You know it's true or you wouldn't be acting like such a little biotch trying your damndest to deny it.

[This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]

Luzap · 09-27-2000, 12:35 PM

dont get mad Cannibal. It's your credibility. Im not denying anything. I cant you have proven nothing.

I have said now 2 times that your assertion is laughable at best. If you want, I can reciprocate and start making shit up that you said. I guess since it's ok for you to do it, I guess I can do it back. Right?

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 12:38 PM

Tell you what KCTitus, I'll find it with my cable modem when I get home tonight. It'll make looking though the posts a little more tolerable.

But I will find it and when I do you will look like a complete fool and a wimp for not admitting it before this.

[This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]

Luzap · 09-27-2000, 12:51 PM

What am I admitting to? That I said Bono was going to take us to the SB? If that's what you claim I said, the 'fool' and 'wimp' monikers will stay where they are right now--with you.

[This message has been edited by KCTitus (edited 09-27-2000).]

Frazod · 09-27-2000, 01:10 PM

Damn ... who da thunk that frickin Bono would spark such a debate?

Luzap · 09-27-2000, 01:41 PM

I found the post...The one I 'think' Cannibal is referring to:

[i]yeah, during that 13-3 regular season we relied on Elliott a lot didnt we? As I recall, we had some close games but in the end won most times NOT the result of Elliott.

Our TEAM led the league in rushing offense scoring, defense and turnover ratio. None of which showed up in that Indy game. Maybe we should have played like we did in the regular season rather than hide our heads in the sand like Marty allways did in the playoffs. But I digress...[/i]

I dont see where I mentioned Bono, but maybe Cannibal will be able to make the 'leap' in logic.

Chief Henry · 09-27-2000, 01:45 PM

Boy,
are the Donx that DESPERATE that they will sign an EX-CHIEF QB????? ROTFLOMA!!

I wonder if our Donkey brotheren will consider this a "good" move??? I doubt it!

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 01:48 PM

What topic was that on KCTitus?

Luzap · 09-27-2000, 01:50 PM

The 'Will you all agree' post...

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 02:21 PM

[i]KCTitus Regular Post# 44
posted 09-14-2000 08:54 AM

Probably. Maybe we should have the type of team that doesnt RELY on kickers to win games. Thinking back to 1995, had we actually played football, we might not have needed to rely on ol' greasy toe elliott.[/i]

[i]Cannibal Regular Post# 46
posted 09-14-2000 09:03 AM

The reason we had to rely on Elliot was because our skill players were Steve Bono, Willie Davis and J.J. Birden, none of which belonged in the NFL as starters for any team, let alone the Chiefs. RRBC didn't help either.[/i]

[i]KCTitus Regular Post# 47
posted 09-14-2000 09:09 AM

yeah, during that 13-3 regular season we relied on Elliott a lot didnt we? As I recall, we had some close games but in the end won most times NOT the result of Elliott. Our TEAM led the league in rushing offense scoring, defense and turnover ratio. None of which showed up in that Indy game. Maybe we should have played like we did in the regular season rather than hide our heads in the sand like Marty allways did in the playoffs. But I digress...

[This message has been edited by KCTitus (edited 09-14-2000).][/i]

The above replies are what I was referring to. In number 46 I stated that our playoff failures were due to a lack a skill position talent and I mentioned STEVE BONO.

In your reply # 47, you insinuate that we had enough talent to win in the playoffs with the talent we had but that Marty Schottenheimer was at fault, "for having his head in the sand".

Admittedly, you did not say he Steve Bono was good enough to win the Superbowl here, but you did insinuate that he was good enough for the Chiefs to win in playoffs. <BR>

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 02:24 PM

To sum it all up, people like you and others who thought the 95 playoff loss was Marty's fault and thought Steve Bono was good enough to win in the playoffs should not be laughing at the Broncos.

If he was good enough for us, he's good enough for them.

Luzap · 09-27-2000, 02:36 PM

*sigh* wonderful leap in logic there, Cannibal, I applaud you. I said nothing about Bono, [b]YOU[/b] did. I INSINUATED nothing.

You can apologize any time for your asinine accusation.

The-Man · 09-27-2000, 02:40 PM

KCT-

If Marty had not had his "head in the sand" how far could Steve Bono have taken the Chiefs in 95?

[This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]

Mosbonian · 09-27-2000, 04:07 PM

OH-NO-BOOOONO is still out there? Damn! Perhaps the donks can make a Bono / Elliot package deal. Sign him rat.......P-L-E-A-S-E!!

seclark · 09-27-2000, 04:25 PM

You two buoys stop that fighten and get in the house right now, take your bath & go to bed without any supper!!!!!!!!!!!

09-27-2000, 12:22 PM	#46
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	You did say it and I'm not going to go back through hundreds of posts to try and find it. You're the coward for not admitting it. You know it's true or you wouldn't be acting like such a little biotch trying your damndest to deny it. [This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 12:35 PM	#47
Luzap 9.89 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $10004900	dont get mad Cannibal. It's your credibility. Im not denying anything. I cant you have proven nothing. I have said now 2 times that your assertion is laughable at best. If you want, I can reciprocate and start making shit up that you said. I guess since it's ok for you to do it, I guess I can do it back. Right?
Posts: 3,327

09-27-2000, 12:38 PM	#48
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	Tell you what KCTitus, I'll find it with my cable modem when I get home tonight. It'll make looking though the posts a little more tolerable. But I will find it and when I do you will look like a complete fool and a wimp for not admitting it before this. [This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 12:51 PM	#49
Luzap 9.89 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $10004900	What am I admitting to? That I said Bono was going to take us to the SB? If that's what you claim I said, the 'fool' and 'wimp' monikers will stay where they are right now--with you. [This message has been edited by KCTitus (edited 09-27-2000).]
Posts: 3,327

09-27-2000, 01:10 PM	#50
Frazod WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $2955085	Damn ... who da thunk that frickin Bono would spark such a debate?
Posts: 119,515

09-27-2000, 07:55 AM
ROBHONDA Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tampa, FL USA Casino cash: $10004900	Its true, go into the Denver Post bronco sight. If Griese does not pass his throwing test TODAY/Wednesday, Shanahan will sign BONO to a contract for back up......... HARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR HARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR you've got to be kidding ME ?????!!! ITS TRUE. ------------------ Chiefs Rock
Posts: 429

09-27-2000, 01:41 PM	#51
Luzap 9.89 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $10004900	I found the post...The one I 'think' Cannibal is referring to: [i]yeah, during that 13-3 regular season we relied on Elliott a lot didnt we? As I recall, we had some close games but in the end won most times NOT the result of Elliott. Our TEAM led the league in rushing offense scoring, defense and turnover ratio. None of which showed up in that Indy game. Maybe we should have played like we did in the regular season rather than hide our heads in the sand like Marty allways did in the playoffs. But I digress...[/i] I dont see where I mentioned Bono, but maybe Cannibal will be able to make the 'leap' in logic.
Posts: 3,327

09-27-2000, 01:45 PM	#52
Chief Henry MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: IOWA Casino cash: $10005088	Boy, are the Donx that DESPERATE that they will sign an EX-CHIEF QB????? ROTFLOMA!! I wonder if our Donkey brotheren will consider this a "good" move??? I doubt it!
Posts: 8,361

09-27-2000, 01:48 PM	#53
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	What topic was that on KCTitus?
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 01:50 PM	#54
Luzap 9.89 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $10004900	The 'Will you all agree' post...
Posts: 3,327

09-27-2000, 02:21 PM	#55
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	[i]KCTitus Regular Post# 44 posted 09-14-2000 08:54 AM Probably. Maybe we should have the type of team that doesnt RELY on kickers to win games. Thinking back to 1995, had we actually played football, we might not have needed to rely on ol' greasy toe elliott.[/i] [i]Cannibal Regular Post# 46 posted 09-14-2000 09:03 AM The reason we had to rely on Elliot was because our skill players were Steve Bono, Willie Davis and J.J. Birden, none of which belonged in the NFL as starters for any team, let alone the Chiefs. RRBC didn't help either.[/i] [i]KCTitus Regular Post# 47 posted 09-14-2000 09:09 AM yeah, during that 13-3 regular season we relied on Elliott a lot didnt we? As I recall, we had some close games but in the end won most times NOT the result of Elliott. Our TEAM led the league in rushing offense scoring, defense and turnover ratio. None of which showed up in that Indy game. Maybe we should have played like we did in the regular season rather than hide our heads in the sand like Marty allways did in the playoffs. But I digress... [This message has been edited by KCTitus (edited 09-14-2000).][/i] The above replies are what I was referring to. In number 46 I stated that our playoff failures were due to a lack a skill position talent and I mentioned STEVE BONO. In your reply # 47, you insinuate that we had enough talent to win in the playoffs with the talent we had but that Marty Schottenheimer was at fault, "for having his head in the sand". Admittedly, you did not say he Steve Bono was good enough to win the Superbowl here, but you did insinuate that he was good enough for the Chiefs to win in playoffs. <BR>
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 02:24 PM	#56
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	To sum it all up, people like you and others who thought the 95 playoff loss was Marty's fault and thought Steve Bono was good enough to win in the playoffs should not be laughing at the Broncos. If he was good enough for us, he's good enough for them.
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 02:36 PM	#57
Luzap 9.89 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $10004900	sigh wonderful leap in logic there, Cannibal, I applaud you. I said nothing about Bono, [b]YOU[/b] did. I INSINUATED nothing. You can apologize any time for your asinine accusation.
Posts: 3,327

09-27-2000, 02:40 PM	#58
The-Man Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: San Leandro, Ca, USA Casino cash: $10004900	KCT- If Marty had not had his "head in the sand" how far could Steve Bono have taken the Chiefs in 95? [This message has been edited by Cannibal (edited 09-27-2000).]
Posts: 604

09-27-2000, 04:07 PM	#59
Mosbonian On Hiatus Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $2399700	OH-NO-BOOOONO is still out there? Damn! Perhaps the donks can make a Bono / Elliot package deal. Sign him rat.......P-L-E-A-S-E!!
Posts: 11,301

09-27-2000, 04:25 PM	#60
seclark MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: nemo Casino cash: $1519900	You two buoys stop that fighten and get in the house right now, take your bath & go to bed without any supper!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts: 13,402