Chiefs The Joeckeling of SNR - Page 18

Direckshun · 04-03-2013, 09:25 PM

It's happening, bitches.

For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games.

If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR.

If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun.

(This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.)

I am sleepwalking through this one, folks.

I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna

No one has yet to answer my question. What specifically did he do well to warrant he did well and contributed to his team's success?

You're right. Peterson had the second best year ever and the left tackle had nothing to do with it. Also only allowed 15 qb pressures and 2 sacks all season.

You're a ****ing idiot.

**RealSNR** · 04-04-2013, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

S'not his game.

Have you seen the kind of tackles that Andy Reid likes? Joeckel ain't it if it's not "his thing."

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 04:41 PM

If there was ever any doubt about how much of a clown Setsuna is, that Kalil comment should seal it

**RealSNR** · 04-04-2013, 04:43 PM

Kalil only successfully protected a weak-armed QB who likes to hold onto the ball as long as Cassel does and paved the way for a 2000 yard rusher.

Dude totally sucks.

Direckshun · 04-04-2013, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Have you seen the kind of tackles that Andy Reid likes? Joeckel ain't it if it's not "his thing."

That's 100% fair.

That does little to disparage Joeckel's game, though.

Make no mistake. You are getting Joeckeled.

The Joeckeling will be rough. You will not enjoy it.

But it will be a solid Joeckeling nonetheless.

Molitoth · 04-04-2013, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

I don't understand what you're struggling with, so maybe you could clarify that part for me. As for the QB problem, the team traded for its QB. Now, whether that's part of some deeper scheme, I can't say, but it spent money and draft capital to bring A. Smith in. That means, at least potentially, that the team is happy at the QB spot and can address other issues, since Smith is only 28 and is nowhere near retirement age for his position.

I was asking what you would do in my scenario... you have to answer that first.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 04-04-2013, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle

Yikes. Are you Bosschiefs son?

Nice post, Hootie.

Mother****erJones · 04-04-2013, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Kalil only successfully protected a weak-armed QB who likes to hold onto the ball as long as Cassel does and paved the way for a 2000 yard rusher.

Dude totally sucks.

Ya definitely shouldn't of gone that high...

Sweet Daddy Hate · 04-04-2013, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

If I had my way, I'd trade Albert, start Stephenson, sign Clabo and draft Geno.

In.
Posted via Mobile Device

Just Passin' By · 04-04-2013, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth

I was asking what you would do in my scenario... you have to answer that first.

My question to you was genuine, in that I didn't understand where your hang up was, when you claimed you were struggling with my post. Your question was an obvious attempt to lead an answer. Why would I answer your question, when your question deliberately begs the answer rather then serving as an honest starting point?

Rasputin · 04-06-2013, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

1 vs. 5 hmm let's see how this works out

It is going be a slaughterhouse if/when Direckshun loses this thing.

Sassy Squatch · 04-06-2013, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Nice post, Hootie.

Figured I had one in the bank when you BANNED ME FOR NO REASON!!!!!! *glare*

Direckshun · 04-24-2013, 10:20 AM

I would just like to remind all five guys who are currently locked in a bet with me that this is still a thing.

I will not tolerate welching. I will dedicate thread after thread to your utter disappointment as a poster, if I have to.

**RealSNR** · 04-24-2013, 10:24 AM

**** that. I'm backing out of this shit.

I'm refuse to even risk losing any pride or self-worth, even if it's fake internet self-worth, over Luke ****ing Joeckel.

That fat piece of AIDS can go die in a ****ing fire. I hate him and everything he represents. I hate him more than Eric Winston, and I probably hate him more than Matt Cassel.

Continue your bets with the others, dude. I'm out. This shit isn't fun. It's depressing.

Direckshun · 04-24-2013, 10:44 AM

Don't be a poor sport. Stick it out. Finish what you started. People shouldn't be allowed to start bets to prove a point, then back out when they have to back it up later.

The whole point of making a bet is to tax some bullshit you were spewing about Joeckel because you were mad.

04-03-2013, 09:25 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4393447	The Joeckeling of SNR It's happening, bitches. For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games. If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR. If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun. (This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.) I am sleepwalking through this one, folks. I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.
Posts: 59,260

04-04-2013, 04:41 PM	#258
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	If there was ever any doubt about how much of a clown Setsuna is, that Kalil comment should seal it __________________
Posts: 23,212

04-04-2013, 04:43 PM	#259
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $2380208	Kalil only successfully protected a weak-armed QB who likes to hold onto the ball as long as Cassel does and paved the way for a 2000 yard rusher. Dude totally sucks.
Posts: 90,367

04-24-2013, 10:20 AM	#268
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4393447	I would just like to remind all five guys who are currently locked in a bet with me that this is still a thing. I will not tolerate welching. I will dedicate thread after thread to your utter disappointment as a poster, if I have to.
Posts: 59,260

04-24-2013, 10:24 AM	#269
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $2380208	** that. I'm backing out of this shit. I'm refuse to even risk losing any pride or self-worth, even if it's fake internet self-worth, over Luke ing Joeckel. That fat piece of AIDS can go die in a **ing fire. I hate him and everything he represents. I hate him more than Eric Winston, and I probably hate him more than Matt Cassel. Continue your bets with the others, dude. I'm out. This shit isn't fun. It's depressing.
Posts: 90,367

04-24-2013, 10:44 AM	#270
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4393447	Don't be a poor sport. Stick it out. Finish what you started. People shouldn't be allowed to start bets to prove a point, then back out when they have to back it up later. The whole point of making a bet is to tax some bullshit you were spewing about Joeckel because you were mad.
Posts: 59,260