|
|
09-02-2012, 03:24 PM | #1 |
Molôn Labé
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Carolina
Casino cash: $8566872
|
|
Posts: 23,164
|
09-02-2012, 03:27 PM | #2 |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $2184734
|
|
Posts: 56,846
|
09-02-2012, 03:36 PM | #3 |
Cheat Death
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Land of Drincoln
Casino cash: $2158244
|
Low and slow is preferred but you can high heat a brisket at 325-375 for 4-5 hours if you foil it. I've done several, but not with your set up. You'll lose some bark but you can keep it tender.
|
Posts: 33,995
|
09-02-2012, 03:41 PM | #4 | |
Molôn Labé
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Carolina
Casino cash: $8566872
|
10-4 on the fat cap & against grain
Quote:
Nope, won't be any bark... Still contemplating Orion or my infrared grill .... Infrared will get some bark when it's time... What kind of beef cut will this taste similar too if done right? |
|
Posts: 23,164
|
09-02-2012, 03:43 PM | #5 |
Cheat Death
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Land of Drincoln
Casino cash: $2158244
|
|
Posts: 33,995
|
09-02-2012, 03:47 PM | #6 |
Molôn Labé
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Carolina
Casino cash: $8566872
|
Plenty of fat to make the meat tender.... Beings this cut is from the breast area and cows don't have collarbones, I have read there is alot of connective tissue here and for this connective tissue to gelantize (sp?) this takes a long slow cooking
|
Posts: 23,164
|
09-02-2012, 03:56 PM | #7 | |
Cheat Death
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Land of Drincoln
Casino cash: $2158244
|
Quote:
If you have a cooker that can maintain 225 and plenty of time, I'd go low and slow. If you have a cooker that struggles to maintain a low temp or want to do a brisket without burning an entire day, you might benefit from a higher heat method. |
|
Posts: 33,995
|
|
|