Chiefs Albert not going anywhere.

**The Bad Guy** · 05-01-2013, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

for months people have bent over backwards to argue that Albert sucks, and is a terrible human for wanting to be paid money...

this is awesome, I love Albert, and have defended him from Day 1

only downside is we spent the #1 pick in the draft on a RT, which is just the dumbest, most pathetic ****ing thing imaginable...i mean it is reeruned (you idiot homers can shove it up your asses)

QBs are risky...drafting RTs from the MAC is smart: said no one but Chiefs fans ever

Yes, because Fisher's position is set in stone and is only on a one year deal and we absolutely know that Albert will be back next year.

Who else were they taking there? Some of you make this out to be that they passed on Andrew Luck because it was too risky. Passing on Geno Smith is receiving this much ridicule?

ChiefsCountry · 05-01-2013, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Some of you make this out to be that they passed on Andrew Luck because it was too risky.

Knowing how stupid the Chiefs are they would have been the team that took Matt Kalil over Andrew Luck and RGIII.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 05-02-2013, 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Yes, because Fisher's position is set in stone and is only on a one year deal and we absolutely know that Albert will be back next year.

Who else were they taking there? Some of you make this out to be that they passed on Andrew Luck because it was too risky. Passing on Geno Smith is receiving this much ridicule?

I was one of the biggest Geno supporters and I don't think Geno has anything to do with Fisher being a poor selection. This was obviously a tackle heavy draft, and we have a coach who values both sides of the line equally so I understand why we did it and I don't hate it. At all. I can see some serious upside to our running game, and protecting our game manager.

I just think Dion Jordan would've been a much better selection. He has elite potential and Tamba isn't getting younger. It would've been an incredible rotation and we would've had the most sacks in the league next year IMO. That itself takes a lot of pressure off of an offense. What's done is done though, my choice to be a fan and I'm optimistic.

**buddha** · 05-02-2013, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

I was one of the biggest Geno supporters and I don't think Geno has anything to do with Fisher being a poor selection. This was obviously a tackle heavy draft, and we have a coach who values both sides of the line equally so I understand why we did it and I don't hate it. At all. I can see some serious upside to our running game, and protecting our game manager.

I just think Dion Jordan would've been a much better selection. He has elite potential and Tamba isn't getting younger. It would've been an incredible rotation and we would've had the most sacks in the league next year IMO. That itself takes a lot of pressure off of an offense. What's done is done though, my choice to be a fan and I'm optimistic.

Dion may end up being great, but he's FAR from that right now. I didn't want another "potential" pick. I think Fisher is much closer to being Pro Bowl calibre than either Dion or Geno for that matter.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 05-02-2013, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buddha

Dion may end up being great, but he's FAR from that right now. I didn't want another "potential" pick. I think Fisher is much closer to being Pro Bowl calibre than either Dion or Geno for that matter.

That's true, and fair enough. He does have bust potential.

**Dave Lane** · 05-02-2013, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

That's true, and fair enough. He does have bust potential.

So does Fisher.

MY god this is what we are reduced to as Chiefs fans. Arguing over whether OL or DL is the safer overall pick at 1.1

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 05-02-2013, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

So does Fisher.

MY god this is what we are reduced to as Chiefs fans. Arguing over whether OL or DL is the safer overall pick at 1.1

Hey, I was just respecting the guy's opinion. Dion was my choice for the Chiefs. I think he's going to be an elite sacker in this league. You can't have enough of those guys. Houston, Hali, and Jordan would've been amazing IMO.

Outside of Geno, who turned into a 2nd rounder, Dion Jordan was my pick. I mean 1 QB went in the entire 1st round. What's that say? And who here wanted EJ Manuel with the 1st pick in the draft? Bad timing for us. A lot of people say they're smarter than Reid and Dorsey, but they'd be idiots to say they're smarter than everyone in the league.

philfree · 05-02-2013, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

I was one of the biggest Geno supporters and I don't think Geno has anything to do with Fisher being a poor selection. This was obviously a tackle heavy draft, and we have a coach who values both sides of the line equally so I understand why we did it and I don't hate it. At all. I can see some serious upside to our running game, and protecting our game manager.

I just think Dion Jordan would've been a much better selection. He has elite potential and Tamba isn't getting younger. It would've been an incredible rotation and we would've had the most sacks in the league next year IMO. That itself takes a lot of pressure off of an offense. What's done is done though, my choice to be a fan and I'm optimistic.

C'mon man we got Catapano.