If Bowe goes down . . .

[OldSchool]

Avery runs a 4.27, Moncrief runs a 4.4. He's just as fast? Huh?

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by OldSchool

Avery runs a 4.27, Moncrief runs a 4.4. He's just as fast? Huh?

Not to start a pissing match, but in fairness, Avery ran a 4.27 7 years ago.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Not to start a pissing match, but in fairness, Avery ran a 4.27 7 years ago.

And in fairness, Donte Moncrief will NEVER run a 4.27.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

And in fairness, Donte Moncrief will NEVER run a 4.27.

Not arguing that in the slightest.

[Saccopoo]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Not to start a pissing match, but in fairness, Avery ran a 4.27 7 years ago.

Who said Avery ran a 4.27?

He ran a 4.49 at the Combine.

Moncrief ran a 4.40.

So, for those of you who took note, Moncrief and Avery are not just as fast. Moncrief is faster.

One reporter asked an interesting follow-up to that claim: Why did Avery run a 4.49-second 40-yard dash at the Combine?

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Who said Avery ran a 4.27?

He ran a 4.49 at the Combine.

Moncrief ran a 4.40.

So, for those of you who took note, Moncrief and Avery are not just as fast. Moncrief is faster.

Guessing you have someone on ignore. Post 97.

I took him at his word, my mistake.

[OldSchool]

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Who said Avery ran a 4.27?

He ran a 4.49 at the Combine.

Moncrief ran a 4.40.

So, for those of you who took note, Moncrief and Avery are not just as fast. Moncrief is faster.

Because he pulled his hammy while running.

[jd1020]

Get your stopwatches out!

[Saccopoo]

Originally Posted by OldSchool

Because he pulled his hammy while running.

And?

A month later he timed a 4.35 at his pro day on a stopwatch. That would put him at mid 4.4's on a laser at the Combine.

Moncrief is as fast or faster than Avery.

At 4 inches taller and 35 lbs. heavier. He's also got a higher vertical.

What else do you want?

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

And?

A month later he timed a 4.35 at his pro day on a stopwatch. That would put him at mid 4.4's on a laser at the Combine.

Moncrief is as fast or faster than Avery.

At 4 inches taller and 35 lbs. heavier. He's also got a higher vertical.

What else do you want?

Somebody who consistently catches the ball.

We already have a big, physical wide receiver that doesn't know how to ****ing concentrate.

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Somebody who consistently catches the ball.

You can wish in one hand and crap in the other...

[OldSchool]

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

And?

A month later he timed a 4.35 at his pro day on a stopwatch. That would put him at mid 4.4's on a laser at the Combine.

Moncrief is as fast or faster than Avery.

At 4 inches taller and 35 lbs. heavier. He's also got a higher vertical.

What else do you want?

Go look at the tape of Avery coming out of college and tell me that Moncrief is faster than Avery.

Don't get me wrong, I like Moncrief and would take him in a heartbeat simply because he is a hell of a lot younger, bigger, tougher, with great athleticism for his size, and therefore he has a lot of potential. But don't lie through your teeth about his abilities and say that he's faster than one of the fastest WRs in the league.

[Saccopoo]

Originally Posted by OldSchool

Go look at the tape of Avery coming out of college and tell me that Moncrief is faster than Avery.

Lasers don't lie.

Don't get me wrong, I like Moncrief and would take him in a heartbeat simply because he is a hell of a lot younger, bigger, tougher, with great athleticism for his size, and therefore he has a lot of potential. But don't lie through your teeth about his abilities and say that he's faster than one of the fastest WRs in the league.

Moncrief timed an official 4.40 on laser at the Combine.

Avery timed a 4.34 and a 4.35 on a stop watch at his Pro Day.

Take it for what it's worth.