Who do you take? - Page 5

ILChief · 12-15-2007, 04:44 PM

Chiefs are on the clock and both Jake Long and Glen Dorsey are both sitting there.

who do you take? (these are the only two choices, no Gaz option)

Mecca · 12-15-2007, 06:20 PM

We'll see......all the practices at the Senior Bowl go into that stuff too...

I don't see him as a top 3 player or even close right now.

dj56dt58 · 12-15-2007, 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Also here's an example.....some years ago....when New England was bad and had the 6th pick.....

They took Richard Seymour some people didn't like that, a few picks later Keyatta Walker the highest rated Tackle went.....

Are you saying because this line sucks you'd rather have Walker than Seymour......you can't draft that way.

so your saying you know for a fact Dorsey is going to be a great DT and Long isnt going to amount to anything?? I mean if you know for a fact then i'm all for it. Why didn't you tell CP not to draft Sims dammit? Or Tom Brady for that matter

suds79 · 12-15-2007, 06:24 PM

Wow. Gotta say that's shocking how the polling is going.

Is that thing rigged?

Another DT?

Yeah lets just keep drafting the 1 position we've proven we cannot not evaluate while at the same time letting the rest of our team erode away.

dj56dt58 · 12-15-2007, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Wow. Gotta say that's shocking how the polling is going.

Is that thing rigged?

Another DT?

Yeah lets just keep drafting the 1 position we've proven we cannot not evaluate while at the same time letting the rest of our team erode away.

I'm just glad Mecca isn't going on about how we should draft John David Booty

Mecca · 12-15-2007, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Wow. Gotta say that's shocking how the polling is going.

Is that thing rigged?

Another DT?

Yeah lets just keep drafting the 1 position we've proven we cannot not evaluate while at the same time letting the rest of our team erode away.

Um Dorsey is probably the 1st or 2nd best player in the draft....

I can pull that same shit on you..."lets just keep getting mediocre players that fill needs and strive to be 8-8"

Mecca · 12-15-2007, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58

I'm just glad Mecca isn't going on about how we should draft John David Booty

Why the hell would I do that.......I'm generally pretty good with the draft, so I'm not gonna pump up some guy who isn't that good.

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-15-2007, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Wow. Gotta say that's shocking how the polling is going.

Is that thing rigged?

Another DT?

BPA

**AustinChief** · 12-15-2007, 06:47 PM

Our D is at least MEDIOCRE again.. yet our offense is awful. The biggest need on the TEAM is LT. We are possibly one LT and one guard away from being decent again. I would agree with NOT taking a LT as a major reach but if Long is available he is a no brainer. Dorsey will probably be great as well.. but he is NOT that much better of a player. I will admit I have only watched him in 3 games this year.. but I wasn't overly impressed. He is great but not some god-like player.

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-15-2007, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Our D is at least MEDIOCRE again.. yet our offense is awful. The biggest need on the TEAM is LT.

Man, I can't believe you want to be mediocre

JBucc · 12-15-2007, 07:19 PM

Dorsey not even close.

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-15-2007, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by findthedr

I cant believe you want to stay awful.

yeah, lets draft need, and negate the BPA

Chiefnj2 · 12-15-2007, 07:35 PM

The Senior Bowl week of practice shouldn't change anyone's opinion. Sims excelled at the Senior Bowl, Ugoh performed poorly, etc. Don't draft workout wonders.

eazyb81 · 12-15-2007, 07:49 PM

I lean towards Dorsey at this point, but the gap between the two players isn't nearly as large as some are making it out to be.

In addition, while some have speculated that Long may be a better fit as a dominant RT rather than a LT, we won't know about that until the Senior Bowl and then the combine.

For the Dorsey fans, would you change your mind if after the combine all the experts are sold on Long as a LT? I would.

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-15-2007, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

For the Dorsey fans, would you change your mind if after the combine all the experts are sold on Long as a LT? I would.

No, workout numbers don't mean a damn thing

|Zach| · 12-15-2007, 08:08 PM

If Tribal ran this team we wouldn't have one of the lone bright spots this team actually produced.

Dewayne Jarrett would be skulking around our sidelines.

View Poll Results: If both are available, who do you take?
Jake Long, OT Michigan	30	42.25%
Glen Dorsey, DT LSU	41	57.75%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

12-15-2007, 04:44 PM
ILChief MVP Join Date: Jan 2001 Casino cash: $7914831	Who do you take? Chiefs are on the clock and both Jake Long and Glen Dorsey are both sitting there. who do you take? (these are the only two choices, no Gaz option)
Posts: 11,476

12-15-2007, 06:20 PM	#61
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2477050	We'll see......all the practices at the Senior Bowl go into that stuff too... I don't see him as a top 3 player or even close right now.
Posts: 111,020

12-15-2007, 06:24 PM	#63
suds79 MVP Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $10005036	Wow. Gotta say that's shocking how the polling is going. Is that thing rigged? Another DT? Yeah lets just keep drafting the 1 position we've proven we cannot not evaluate while at the same time letting the rest of our team erode away.
Posts: 5,747

12-15-2007, 06:47 PM	#68
AustinChief Administrator Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $2529112	Our D is at least MEDIOCRE again.. yet our offense is awful. The biggest need on the TEAM is LT. We are possibly one LT and one guard away from being decent again. I would agree with NOT taking a LT as a major reach but if Long is available he is a no brainer. Dorsey will probably be great as well.. but he is NOT that much better of a player. I will admit I have only watched him in 3 games this year.. but I wasn't overly impressed. He is great but not some god-like player.
Posts: 19,535

12-15-2007, 07:19 PM	#70
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	Dorsey not even close.
Posts: 12,016

12-15-2007, 07:35 PM	#72
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $7873688	The Senior Bowl week of practice shouldn't change anyone's opinion. Sims excelled at the Senior Bowl, Ugoh performed poorly, etc. Don't draft workout wonders. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,394

12-15-2007, 07:49 PM	#73
eazyb81 The Illuminati Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: the road less traveled Casino cash: $10004900	I lean towards Dorsey at this point, but the gap between the two players isn't nearly as large as some are making it out to be. In addition, while some have speculated that Long may be a better fit as a dominant RT rather than a LT, we won't know about that until the Senior Bowl and then the combine. For the Dorsey fans, would you change your mind if after the combine all the experts are sold on Long as a LT? I would.
Posts: 12,033

12-15-2007, 08:08 PM	#75
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $5266768	If Tribal ran this team we wouldn't have one of the lone bright spots this team actually produced. Dewayne Jarrett would be skulking around our sidelines.
Posts: 53,446