Electronics New digital camera wanted?

**btlook1** · 05-02-2010, 06:21 AM

Broke our cheap Sony yesterday and am needing a new one. WE have a good nikon 35mm with a couple of nice lenses. I'm wondering if we go purchase a new Nikon digital would the lenses interchange....Need to do some research but I know there are some camera people here so thought I would ask. CP usually puts out some good advice. Would like to stay under 500 if I can! Suggestions? Thank you!

RedandGold · 05-02-2010, 07:32 AM

There won't be an issue mounting the old lenses from your film Nikon SLR to a new Nikon digital SLR, but the effective focal length will be affected. If I recall correctly, the effect would be roughly double.

Also, if you're looking to stay under $500, you'll be looking at either a used or refurbished model or a new D3000. If you're willing to spend a little extra, you should be able to get into a new body-only D5000 for between $500 and $600.

Personally, I would spring for the D5000 since it has the same sensor as the D90 and a higher native ISO than the D3000 (3200 vs 1600). The only real drawback is that the vibration reduction (VR) isn't built into the body, so you have to buy VR lenses to get that functionality.

**btlook1** · 05-03-2010, 03:04 AM

Thanks red and gold...appreciate the advice.

Great Expectations · 05-18-2010, 01:41 PM

I'm also looking for a new digital camera, why is a Nikon or Cannon better than this:

http://deals.woot.com/deals/details/...oot-15989665#6

**mikeyis4dcats.** · 05-18-2010, 03:36 PM

well, for one thing that Fuji is huge. If you want a casual point and shoot, get a Canon A series (I have 2 A590s myself and have owned several before). if you buy a camera you can't slip in a purse or pocket and carry comfortably, you will take a lot less pictures.

Great Expectations · 05-19-2010, 07:57 AM

Would this one be much better despite the lower mega pixels?

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14256

**Buehler445** · 05-19-2010, 08:04 AM

Good timing. My dumbass broke my camera yesterday.

Anyway. I'm open for suggestions. I'm pretty casual use, but would like to take decent pictures.

RedandGold · 05-19-2010, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations

Would this one be much better despite the lower mega pixels?

http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14256

That particular Canon (XTi) has already been replaced by two different models (XSi and then T1i -- three if the T2i ends up replacing the T1i) that were progressively better, so if you're bargain shopping, I'd probably look for a clearance deal on the XSi instead of the XTi.

While it doesn't have the ISO range of the T1i, it's still a good DSLR, and it would be considered an upgrade from an advanced point & shoot like the Fuji at woot.

Great Expectations · 05-19-2010, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedandGold

That particular Canon (XTi) has already been replaced by two different models (XSi and then T1i -- three if the T2i ends up replacing the T1i) that were progressively better, so if you're bargain shopping, I'd probably look for a clearance deal on the XSi instead of the XTi.

While it doesn't have the ISO range of the T1i, it's still a good DSLR, and it would be considered an upgrade from an advanced point & shoot like the Fuji at woot.

Thank you, would a Canon EOS 20D be better?

RedandGold · 05-20-2010, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Great Expectations

Thank you, would a Canon EOS 20D be better?

Compared to the XTi (assuming you're buying used), I'd probably go with the 20D. In terms of the guts, there probably isn't much difference between the two. They both have a 9-point AF and the same image processor, but the 20D would give you a more sturdy magnesium alloy body and a little better fps rate. For normal use, I doubt you'd see much difference between the 8.2MP in the 20D vs. the 10.1 in the XTi.

Basically, you'll find that many of the features that appeared in the older higher-end models get flowed down to the newer entry-level models fairly quickly, so while the 20D was quite a camera six years ago, you can find better features in a newer lower-end model like the T1i.

I'd say that if you're able to get into a used 20D with a kit lens for $300 or less, you're getting a pretty good value. It won't have a lot of the "whistles and bells" of the newer DSLR's, but it would be a sturdy camera that's capable of some very nice images when paired with a quality lens.

Great Expectations · 05-20-2010, 01:53 PM

I'm going with this one:

http://nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/...462/D3000.html

I found it refurbished for $375 all in.

05-02-2010, 06:21 AM
btlook1 umm...what do I say here? Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: S.E. Kansas Casino cash: $9495227	New digital camera wanted? Broke our cheap Sony yesterday and am needing a new one. WE have a good nikon 35mm with a couple of nice lenses. I'm wondering if we go purchase a new Nikon digital would the lenses interchange....Need to do some research but I know there are some camera people here so thought I would ask. CP usually puts out some good advice. Would like to stay under 500 if I can! Suggestions? Thank you!
Posts: 1,289

05-02-2010, 07:32 AM	#2
RedandGold Born with Bad Habits Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Right Here Casino cash: $2549109	There won't be an issue mounting the old lenses from your film Nikon SLR to a new Nikon digital SLR, but the effective focal length will be affected. If I recall correctly, the effect would be roughly double. Also, if you're looking to stay under $500, you'll be looking at either a used or refurbished model or a new D3000. If you're willing to spend a little extra, you should be able to get into a new body-only D5000 for between $500 and $600. Personally, I would spring for the D5000 since it has the same sensor as the D90 and a higher native ISO than the D3000 (3200 vs 1600). The only real drawback is that the vibration reduction (VR) isn't built into the body, so you have to buy VR lenses to get that functionality.
Posts: 1,292

05-03-2010, 03:04 AM	#3
btlook1 umm...what do I say here? Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: S.E. Kansas Casino cash: $9495227	Thanks red and gold...appreciate the advice. __________________ BTW, your draft input is reminiscent of a porn stars cock sucking gone wild video. Sure it's great when they open their mouths but the funk that drips out afterward nobody wants a part of[/quote]
Posts: 1,289

05-18-2010, 01:41 PM	#4
Great Expectations MVP Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Joplin, MO Casino cash: $13512338	I'm also looking for a new digital camera, why is a Nikon or Cannon better than this: http://deals.woot.com/deals/details/...oot-15989665#6
Posts: 7,228

05-18-2010, 03:36 PM	#5
mikeyis4dcats. Scarlett Johansson's boytoy Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $9555998	well, for one thing that Fuji is huge. If you want a casual point and shoot, get a Canon A series (I have 2 A590s myself and have owned several before). if you buy a camera you can't slip in a purse or pocket and carry comfortably, you will take a lot less pictures.
Posts: 12,526

05-19-2010, 07:57 AM	#6
Great Expectations MVP Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Joplin, MO Casino cash: $13512338	Would this one be much better despite the lower mega pixels? http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...&modelid=14256
Posts: 7,228

05-19-2010, 08:04 AM	#7
Buehler445 Supporter Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Scott City KS Casino cash: $2124734	Good timing. My dumbass broke my camera yesterday. Anyway. I'm open for suggestions. I'm pretty casual use, but would like to take decent pictures.
Posts: 56,879

05-20-2010, 01:53 PM	#11
Great Expectations MVP Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Joplin, MO Casino cash: $13512338	I'm going with this one: http://nikonusa.com/Find-Your-Nikon/...462/D3000.html I found it refurbished for $375 all in.
Posts: 7,228