Nevada police seize house, arrest homeowners for 'tactical advantage.'

[Chief Roundup]

The Mitchells are being represented. If you all think this is all a big lie then someone could call their lawyers which are mentioned in the original article.
Cofer, Geller & Durham out of Las Vegas.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

The Mitchells are being represented. If you all think this is all a big lie then someone could call their lawyers which are mentioned in the original article.
Cofer, Geller & Durham out of Las Vegas.

Who said lie?

There is NO credible source for this story. It should be top story on Vegas TV.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by TrueFanDave

Who said lie?

There is NO credible source for this story. It should be top story on Vegas TV.

well, "the news" has filters, you know

From MSN;



Police allegedly violate Third Amendment just in time for the Fourth


The Third Amendment, which forbids forcefully quartering soldiers in people's homes, doesn't get brought up a lot. Anthony Mitchell of Henderson, Nev., is suing the city for Third Amendment violations. He was arrested for not allowing police officers to use his home as a lookout for an investigation. After Mitchell refused their initial request over the phone, officers allegedly showed up at his door with a metal ram and broke in, "Addressing the plaintiff as 'asshole,'" says the best part of the complaint, "Officers shouted conflicting orders at Mitchell." When he didn't (or couldn't) comply, they allegedly hit him and his dog with pepper spray. The really crazy thing: they also arrested Mitchell's parents, who live on the same street, for the same "crime." Everybody gets a Third Amendment violation! — By Nick Mangione [Source]

http://now.msn.com/anthony-mitchell-...ent-violations


Unfortunately(for main media), this story is gaining legs

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

well, "the news" has filters, you know

From MSN;



Police allegedly violate Third Amendment just in time for the Fourth


The Third Amendment, which forbids forcefully quartering soldiers in people's homes, doesn't get brought up a lot. Anthony Mitchell of Henderson, Nev., is suing the city for Third Amendment violations. He was arrested for not allowing police officers to use his home as a lookout for an investigation. After Mitchell refused their initial request over the phone, officers allegedly showed up at his door with a metal ram and broke in, "Addressing the plaintiff as 'asshole,'" says the best part of the complaint, "Officers shouted conflicting orders at Mitchell." When he didn't (or couldn't) comply, they allegedly hit him and his dog with pepper spray. The really crazy thing: they also arrested Mitchell's parents, who live on the same street, for the same "crime." Everybody gets a Third Amendment violation! — By Nick Mangione [Source]

http://now.msn.com/anthony-mitchell-...ent-violations


Unfortunately(for main media), this story is gaining legs

MSN != MSNBC

Check the source of this news snippet - it's the same as the OP. Clicking around the links on that site, it looks fairly bogus.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

MSN != MSNBC

Check the source of this news snippet - it's the same as the OP. Clicking around the links on that site, it looks fairly bogus.

bogus? I don't see anything suggesting this at all. in fact, this MSN article brings forth a new detail -- the parents who live on that street were arrested during this op as well, which is why I bolded that. So, is this writer conspiring to make the event up too?

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

bogus? I don't see anything suggesting this at all. in fact, this MSN article brings forth a new detail -- the parents who live on that street were arrested during this op as well, which is why I bolded that. So, is this writer conspiring to make the event up too?

Well since the MSN author lists nothing but the OP's site as his source, I'm still skeptical. So we have some guy, and some other guy. They could be the same writer pimping his own work for all we know.

Due to the internet echo chamber/automated blog pimping for pay-per-click ads, any viral article like this is going to have 100s of hits in a day. But a lot of times when you trace them it's all from one source.

I'm not saying the article isn't true. I'd just like to see another source before I believe it.

[mikey23545]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Well since the MSN author lists nothing but the OP's site as his source, I'm still skeptical. So we have some guy, and some other guy. They could be the same writer pimping his own work for all we know.

Due to the internet echo chamber/automated blog pimping for pay-per-click ads, any viral article like this is going to have 100s of hits in a day. But a lot of times when you trace them it's all from one source.

I'm not saying the article isn't true. I'd just like to see another source before I believe it.

Yep, this story just does not pass the smell test at all...

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Well since the MSN author lists nothing but the OP's site as his source, I'm still skeptical. So we have some guy, and some other guy. They could be the same writer pimping his own work for all we know.

Due to the internet echo chamber/automated blog pimping for pay-per-click ads, any viral article like this is going to have 100s of hits in a day. But a lot of times when you trace them it's all from one source.

I'm not saying the article isn't true. I'd just like to see another source before I believe it.

How about the Las Vegas Review Journal?

http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/cr...ng-their-homes