|
05-23-2009, 07:49 PM | #2 |
This is the way
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Casino cash: $9975673
|
go ask 1992
__________________
"No Two People Will Do It The Same, You got It Down...When You Appear to Be In Pain!" |
Posts: 11,800
|
05-23-2009, 07:50 PM | #3 |
Losing with passion.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oblivion
Casino cash: $10004925
|
Sun dial works for me.
|
Posts: 4,399
|
05-23-2009, 08:01 PM | #4 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St. Loser, MO
Casino cash: $10005674
|
Dan vs. Dan
|
Posts: 4,160
|
05-23-2009, 08:55 PM | #5 |
GBM 8-12-15
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Dayton, Oh.
Casino cash: $10052154
|
Heh, I had an Ironman. In 1987...
|
Posts: 59,997
|
05-23-2009, 09:01 PM | #6 |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $2990526
|
...go all the way.
|
Posts: 18,393
|
05-23-2009, 09:46 PM | #7 |
Out Gunning CP's Fandom Police
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Laguna Beach, CA
Casino cash: $2313127
|
Can't go wrong with either one. I prefer the Timex Ironman Shock series. I like the Indiglo feature and the time splits. Very easy to use.
__________________
"The CHIEFS, HAVE THEIR DYNASTY!" |
Posts: 34,704
|
05-23-2009, 09:47 PM | #8 |
Opie and Anthony XM 105
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $10002400
|
I have an Ironman Triathlon and it's great
|
Posts: 7,910
|
05-24-2009, 01:59 AM | #9 | |
Everyone else is 'peasants'
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $9994900
|
Dude, a digital watch? Really?
I guess if you're in high school or you're actually in training and need to time yourself, I'd go Timex. But really, I don't think I've seen someone over the age of 17 wearing a digital watch outside of a gymnasium where I didn't immediately think 'What a douche'.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 1,502
|
05-24-2009, 02:31 AM | #10 | |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
05-24-2009, 03:27 AM | #11 |
AIC
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West Roxbury, MA
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I stopped wearing watches since my first cell phone.
|
Posts: 11,478
|
05-24-2009, 03:32 AM | #12 | |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Casino cash: $1612400
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 14,521
|
05-24-2009, 06:25 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pond> Me <Barn
Casino cash: $11298284
|
Had both. Casio had more functions, Ironman was better for synching time off a flashing screen under Windows '98. Quit using '98 in 2000. Can either one synch off the NIST signal coming out of Colorado?
__________________
BrainCase |
Posts: 15,429
|
05-24-2009, 08:58 AM | #14 |
damned n00b
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Casino cash: $10005802
|
I have owned two G-shocks now for the last 19 years. The first one survived 6 years of very hard abuse in the Navy (including 1 year in Gulf War 1) and never missed a beat until the third battery died and when I replaced it the watch just didn't work the same. That was after fifteen years of service.
The new G-shock I own is a MT-G model. I have owned this one for about 3 1/2 years now and this watch kicks ass. Since the day I have taken it out of the box, all I have had to do is set it once and leave it alone. It's solar re-charging so don't need to worry about the batteries. It resets itself everyday at midnite to the U.S. Nuclear clock so it's always within thousandths of a second in accuracy. Oh and my favorite part is it cost me less than $100.00 when I got it. |
Posts: 129
|
05-24-2009, 09:19 AM | #15 |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Back in KC
Casino cash: $10007771
|
I owned a metal G-Shock which I actually purchased in Kuwait. I looked briefly to see if I could find it online, but didn't see it. It has been excellent. Survived 4 years, including a tour overseas. I had a rubber-banded G-shock but the band tends to absorb odors (which is bad when you wear it when you're working out) This one has been free of that problem.
__________________
|
Posts: 4,167
|
|
|