Chiefs If we sign Albert do we still take a tackle - Page 3

Hog's Gone Fishin · 03-03-2013, 11:03 AM

Got to thinking if we resign Albert he has stated he does not want to play guard so would this rule out taking a tackle in rd 1. What if we drafted Fisher and put him at LG. Would that not make our line a beast for Charles to run behind. O r does signing Albert mean we just go in a different direction.

Personally I am warming up to the idea of drafting Geno and just using him as trade bait. Someone in the 6-9 area would surely take him off our hands and if they didn't then there we go.

Ace Gunner · 03-03-2013, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

It's honestly better than letting Albert walk and then taking Joeckel.

I can't believe I'm saying this, but we would literally be better off re-signing Albert and taking Chance ****ing Warmack #1 overall than letting Albert walk and taking Joeckel.

the #1 pick in this draft is like having the #20 pick in a good draft. Geno. That would be my choice. I can get a OG in the first rnd of any draft.

HotCarl · 03-03-2013, 11:37 AM

They will probably re-sign Albert because he's adequate and affordable, but it wouldn't be shocking if they let him go and picked someone who is 6 years younger and has a higher ceiling.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 03-03-2013, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

the #1 pick in this draft is like having the #20 pick in a good draft. Geno. That would be my choice. I can get a OG in the first rnd of any draft.

Of course Geno would be the wise choice, but we're talking about the Chiefs here. When have they ever made the right decision about anything?

OrtonsPiercedTaint · 03-03-2013, 11:40 AM

Eagles fans say Reid is really bad at clock management. So whoever the BPA at the 3rd pick is, will be the #1.

Ace Gunner · 03-03-2013, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

They will probably re-sign Albert because he's adequate and affordable, but it wouldn't be shocking if they let him go and picked someone who is 6 years younger and has a higher ceiling.

they can take the 1st QB in this draft -- you can't do better especially if you're the Chiefs.

HotCarl · 03-03-2013, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

they can take the 1st QB in this draft -- you can't do better especially if you're the Chiefs.

They aren't going to spend their 1st pick on a QB when they've already spent their 2nd on one.

The smart thing is to sign Albert to an affordable deal and trade down.

Ace Gunner · 03-03-2013, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Of course Geno would be the wise choice, but we're talking about the Chiefs here. When have they ever made the right decision about anything?

Lol

I think Dorsey is going to bring some sense into all of this Kansas City nonsense over the past decades.

we got Jamaal & Houston -- that is the starting point of this team's roster we don't need a run game OL -- particularly at OG & C, the interior can be made up of serviceable players because you only run when they are in pass rush sets.

ASmith will keep the seat warm, if he can get them winning some playoffs, he's done his job here. Dorsey is no CP/SP spaz, he is not QB challenged -- no more brodie croyle for you

milkman · 03-03-2013, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

They aren't going to spend their 1st pick on a QB when they've already spent their 2nd on one.

The smart thing is to sign Albert to an affordable deal and trade down.

I really love stupi ****s like you that think any is going to trade up with the Chiefs.

The Jags are sitting in that catbird seat.

The Chiefs just found the biggest dildo they could and ****ed themselves right in the ass.

**Rausch** · 03-03-2013, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

Lol

I think Dorsey is going to bring some sense into all of this Kansas City nonsense over the past decades.

I think he's going to do exactly what he said he's going to do and we'll get solid talent but be pissed off to no end on draft day(s.)

Ace Gunner · 03-03-2013, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

They aren't going to spend their 1st pick on a QB when they've already spent their 2nd on one.

The smart thing is to sign Albert to an affordable deal and trade down.

enough nonsense -- QB, QB's & MORE QB's. Really. They have everything else. They have pass rushers, a corner and safeties... they have WR's, TE's & a RB STAR that will line up split wide and create mismatches for Bowe & co.

They have a DL. ENOUGH with all this "we can't have anything nice" crap. It's high time the Kansas City Chiefs start a QB search.

NOW.

They need to get a guy that they can groom and well, having the first pick is kind of, you know, unbeatable when it comes to grabbing a QB.

So what if Geno is going to need time to develop and play at this level -- I'll be god damned if that isn't EXACTLY what this team is looking for. They can win with Smith, continue to develop the young bucks and when Geno gets his act together -- boom, pull the trigger.

It's not rocket repair n stuff.

Ace Gunner · 03-03-2013, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

I think he's going to do exactly what he said he's going to do and we'll get solid talent but be pissed off to no end on draft day(s.)

completely possible, but didn't he and GB grab a QB in the first and set him for 4 seasons before playing him? I think Dorsey is real happy how that lil springboard worked out

To me, that is the other side of this. He's been part of a successful effort exactly like this in the past, If Geno is all about Geno and more, can't see why Dorsey would hesitate considering the choices in this draft.

TEX · 03-03-2013, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

They will probably re-sign Albert because he's adequate and affordable, but it wouldn't be shocking if they let him go and picked someone who is 6 years younger and has a higher ceiling.

I just can't see letting him go if the object is to improve the team with the 1st pick now. Sure they can draft a LT that's younger with potentially more upside, but how will that improve the team now? In essence, that would mean that they lost Albert and used the # 1 pick to replace talent that they had. Is the new LT better than Albert + whoever they draft at # 1? No way.

patteeu · 03-03-2013, 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I really love stupi ****s like you that think any is going to trade up with the Chiefs.

The Jags are sitting in that catbird seat.

The Chiefs just found the biggest dildo they could and ****ed themselves right in the ass.

The Jaguars may not be interested in trading down. And even if they are, they may ask a higher price than the Chiefs are willing to take. Other than a really marginal difference in the amount of compensation you have to pay for a 1.1 rookie over a 1.2 rookie, there's really no basis for your conclusion.

Teams that assume KC won't take a QB can trade with either KC or JAX to get the first QB off the board. At that point, it just depends on which of those two teams is willing to take the least in return.

ct · 03-03-2013, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

I'm with this bigtime.

I've recently changed my theory on LTs. Everybody thinks of them as the utmost valuable commodities.

I used believe they the same about LT. And the rest of the O-line being just a bunch of guys you can fill in in the mid to late rounds.

After watching Joe Thomas & Jake Long I have to ask myself "Do these guys really impact the game?" Doesn't seem like it.

Not saying they're not important. I still think it's worth while to draft LTs in the 1st round. After all. They are protecting against the best pass rushers. I just don't believe in doing it in say the top 10 anymore. Those teams are generally dreadful and need impact players. Players who effect wins & losses.

Impact being QBs 1st and then pass rushers.

Dion Jordan

Hog's Gone Fishin · 03-03-2013, 12:17 PM

Dorsey's last 3 1st round picks have been

2012 -Tackle
2011 -Tackle
2010 -Nose Tackle

03-03-2013, 11:03 AM
Hog's Gone Fishin Fish are scared of me Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $1670477	If we sign Albert do we still take a tackle Got to thinking if we resign Albert he has stated he does not want to play guard so would this rule out taking a tackle in rd 1. What if we drafted Fisher and put him at LG. Would that not make our line a beast for Charles to run behind. O r does signing Albert mean we just go in a different direction. Personally I am warming up to the idea of drafting Geno and just using him as trade bait. Someone in the 6-9 area would surely take him off our hands and if they didn't then there we go.
Posts: 40,361

03-03-2013, 11:37 AM	#32
HotCarl Registered User Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $10004900	They will probably re-sign Albert because he's adequate and affordable, but it wouldn't be shocking if they let him go and picked someone who is 6 years younger and has a higher ceiling.
Posts: 463

03-03-2013, 11:40 AM	#34
OrtonsPiercedTaint MVP Join Date: Dec 2012 Casino cash: $10004980	Eagles fans say Reid is really bad at clock management. So whoever the BPA at the 3rd pick is, will be the #1.
Posts: 5,994

03-03-2013, 12:17 PM	#45
Hog's Gone Fishin Fish are scared of me Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $1670477	Dorsey's last 3 1st round picks have been 2012 -Tackle 2011 -Tackle 2010 -Nose Tackle
Posts: 40,361