Chiefs Disappointed in McCluster - Page 27

Hammock Parties · 10-10-2010, 08:41 PM

Bla bla bla, he's a playmaker, he has two touchdowns already, whatever.

He has seven catches for 93 yards. 1/3 of that yardage came on one play. At least two of those are screen passes I believe.

That ****ing sucks.

This guy needs to be a threat as a WIDE RECEIVER. He hasnt made a single play down the field. I'm not even talking 20 yards. How about 10? How about coming off the line, putting your foot in the ground, getting open and giving Cassel a target?

I'm not willing to accept the idea that Cassel is so god awful he makes all our wide receivers look terrible.

McCluster hasn't done shit yet. And he was utter garbage in Indy.

Don't buy any of his ****ing t-shirts.

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

**** you.

Jacoby Ford and Mike Willliams have both proven their worth FAR beyond McCluster and his 225 offensive yards.

You're a ****ing moron and you prove it with each and every post.

Get me a beer, BITCH!

where have I disagreed?

at this point I would take Jacoby Ford over McCluster...not sure about Williams since he doesn't match up as well with Bowe...

I'm saying you're an idiot...

I could take this years draft board and pick a player in every round I'd rather have over the player we took in each round...and could do so every single year.

Duh

Duh

Duh

are you ****ing dense?

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:10 AM

I don't think anyone is saying they wouldn't want Jacoby Ford...

we're saying we didn't take him...and 31 other teams passed up on him for 3.5 rounds as well...

so what the **** is your point?

congrats to the Raiders for finding a hidden gem...Bucs too

???

anything else?

god damn

Titty Meat · 12-20-2010, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

And how many kickoff returns for TD's?

If you think that Ford wouldn't be a very good reciever opposite Bowe, especially in the 4th round, there's not much I can say.

Unless of course, you think that Bruce Gradkowski and Jason Campbell are equal to Matt Cassel.

Do you?

I don't think Jacoby Ford would be a very good #2 WR. He's made some great plays on special teams but I wouldn't say he's a better player than McCluster who hasn't even reached his upside yet where as you can argue Ford has.

Sassy Squatch · 12-20-2010, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

**** you.

Jacoby Ford and Mike Willliams have both proven their worth FAR beyond McCluster and his 225 offensive yards.

You're a ****ing moron and you prove it with each and every post.

Get me a beer, BITCH!

**Lumpy** · 12-20-2010, 02:11 AM

JFC, here we go again. Another Dane/Hootie showdown.

Leaving thread in 3...2...1...

Titty Meat · 12-20-2010, 02:11 AM

Hi Lumpy.

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:12 AM

Dane is the king of arguing something that no one else is arguing...

this year Mike Williams and Jacoby Ford are clearly more valuable and better than Dexter McCluster...

but what does that have to do with anything?

LeGarette Blount is better than C.J. Spiller this year, too...

Wtf

we could do that every single year...

it's a dumbass hindsight argument that all of these drafturbators do every year because they think the success rate of draft picks should be 90% when realistically it ends up being somewhere, if you have an excellent GM, around 35% (tops)

salame · 12-20-2010, 02:13 AM

any reerun that would rather have mccluster than mike williams is a reerun
reeruns

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumpy

JFC, here we go again. Another Dane/Hootie showdown.

Leaving thread in 3...2...1...

blame dane

I responded and then, with any solicitation, he called me a loser

just like the thread I started the other day

dude is an angry guy...and I'm depressed for him

he has some serious little man/or tiny penis inferiority complex...one of the two, or both...it's ridiculous

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame

any reerun that would rather have mccluster than mike williams is a reerun
reeruns

I'd rather have a Bowe and Ford than a Bowe and Bowe clone...

why do I want two Bowe's?

**Lumpy** · 12-20-2010, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay

Hi Lumpy.

No sir. Don't even try saying hi to me just so I'll stay in this thread and see how this ends.

salame · 12-20-2010, 02:16 AM

Williams is not a Bowe clone dude
ugh

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:16 AM

I think Mike Williams is going to be a great, great player and if he went back into the draft he'd be a top 15 pick...

but Bowe > Williams so I'd rather have a speed guy like Ford or a slot guy like McCluster...

if we did take Williams I'd still want McCluster...two Bowe's would be good as long as we had a speedster in the slot to stretch the field...

but we're not that type of offense anyways

it's nice that if Charles ever got hurt we'd have a scat back that could execute a Charles like role (just scaled back a bit of course)

Titty Meat · 12-20-2010, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lumpy

No sir. Don't even try saying hi to me just so I'll stay in this thread and see how this ends.

Only newdz can save this thread.

Hootie · 12-20-2010, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame

Williams is not a Bowe clone dude
ugh

Williams was a huge sleeper pick for me in fantasy so I've had a vested interest in him all year and he plays just like Bowe if you ask me

10-10-2010, 08:41 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4700478	Disappointed in McCluster Bla bla bla, he's a playmaker, he has two touchdowns already, whatever. He has seven catches for 93 yards. 1/3 of that yardage came on one play. At least two of those are screen passes I believe. That **ing sucks. This guy needs to be a threat as a WIDE RECEIVER. He hasnt made a single play down the field. I'm not even talking 20 yards. How about 10? How about coming off the line, putting your foot in the ground, getting open and giving Cassel a target? I'm not willing to accept the idea that Cassel is so god awful he makes all our wide receivers look terrible. McCluster hasn't done shit yet. And he was utter garbage in Indy. Don't buy any of his **ing t-shirts.
Posts: 277,920

12-20-2010, 02:10 AM	#392
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I don't think anyone is saying they wouldn't want Jacoby Ford... we're saying we didn't take him...and 31 other teams passed up on him for 3.5 rounds as well... so what the **** is your point? congrats to the Raiders for finding a hidden gem...Bucs too ??? anything else? god damn
Posts: 56,356

12-20-2010, 02:11 AM	#395
Lumpy Supporter Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: On a yellow brick road. Casino cash: $9444900	JFC, here we go again. Another Dane/Hootie showdown. Leaving thread in 3...2...1...
Posts: 8,901

12-20-2010, 02:11 AM	#396
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $2267558	Hi Lumpy.
Posts: 75,169

12-20-2010, 02:12 AM	#397
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Dane is the king of arguing something that no one else is arguing... this year Mike Williams and Jacoby Ford are clearly more valuable and better than Dexter McCluster... but what does that have to do with anything? LeGarette Blount is better than C.J. Spiller this year, too... Wtf we could do that every single year... it's a dumbass hindsight argument that all of these drafturbators do every year because they think the success rate of draft picks should be 90% when realistically it ends up being somewhere, if you have an excellent GM, around 35% (tops)
Posts: 56,356

12-20-2010, 02:13 AM	#398
salame Under the Sofa Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10010607	any reerun that would rather have mccluster than mike williams is a reerun reeruns
Posts: 4,907

12-20-2010, 02:16 AM	#402
salame Under the Sofa Join Date: Apr 2009 Casino cash: $10010607	Williams is not a Bowe clone dude ugh
Posts: 4,907

12-20-2010, 02:16 AM	#403
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I think Mike Williams is going to be a great, great player and if he went back into the draft he'd be a top 15 pick... but Bowe > Williams so I'd rather have a speed guy like Ford or a slot guy like McCluster... if we did take Williams I'd still want McCluster...two Bowe's would be good as long as we had a speedster in the slot to stretch the field... but we're not that type of offense anyways it's nice that if Charles ever got hurt we'd have a scat back that could execute a Charles like role (just scaled back a bit of course)
Posts: 56,356