Stanzi Supporters Need To Apologize

[jspchief]

I've rewatched his play, and honestly its not as bad as its being made out to be. I mean, its not going to get him dropped from the team.

The first int was pretty fluky. He did have defenders in his face a lot. Clearly he didn't play as well as Quinn has, but I'm not sure the book has been written on Stanzi yet.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by jspchief

I've rewatched his play, and honestly its not as bad as its being made out to be. I mean, its not going to get him dropped from the team.

The first int was pretty fluky. He did have defenders in his face a lot. Clearly he didn't play as well as Quinn has, but I'm not sure the book has been written on Stanzi yet.

Yup

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by jspchief

I've rewatched his play, and honestly its not as bad as its being made out to be. I mean, its not going to get him dropped from the team.

The first int was pretty fluky. He did have defenders in his face a lot. Clearly he didn't play as well as Quinn has, but I'm not sure the book has been written on Stanzi yet.

Cut from the team? No freaking way.

Relegated to 3rd string? He earned it.

As much as it pains me to say it, Cassel is CLEARLY the best QB on the roster and Brady Quinn should be the backup.

[Black Bob]

Originally Posted by jspchief

I've rewatched his play, and honestly its not as bad as its being made out to be. I mean, its not going to get him dropped from the team.

Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by BlackBob

Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.

There's nothing for them to gain by cutting Stanzi. There aren't any other developmental QBs available that have considerably more upside than he does. And they're not going to carry just 2 QBs.

He's on the roster pretty much by default.

[Black Bob]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There's nothing for them to gain by cutting Stanzi. There aren't any other developmental QBs available that have considerably more upside than he does. And they're not going to carry just 2 QBs.

He's on the roster pretty much by default.

We don't need a project QB. We are in position to make a run right now. Put him on the practice squad. If a better prospect gets cut, pick them up like we did Thigpen a few years back.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by BlackBob

We don't need a project QB. We are in position to make a run right now. Put him on the practice squad. If a better prospect gets cut, pick them up like we did Thigpen a few years back.

All teams need a developmental QB - at least all SMART teams do. If you want to try and hide him on the PS, go ahead. I'm pretty sure they won't. They like him. They actually like him alot.

[Bewbies]

Originally Posted by BlackBob

We don't need a project QB. We are in position to make a run right now. Put him on the practice squad. If a better prospect gets cut, pick them up like we did Thigpen a few years back.

Who is going to make the roster in the place of the 3rd string QB that will put this team over the edge?

A team should always have a young QB in the 3 spot that they are developing. Always.

[aturnis]

3

Originally Posted by BlackBob

Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.

You're an idiot. They traded McGee b/c he was a pot head and got busted, not to mention his poor play. Football wasn't important enough to him. There was no place for him on this young roster.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by BlackBob

Maybe not that one game, but when you look at the other five, I can see it. Remember when we drafted McGee in the 3rd round a couple of years ago and then quickly traded him Tampa after one season? This is the same thing imo. We need to cut our losses and move on. He should be better at this point and he honestly hasn't shown anything. What has he learned? Has he gotten better?

I can't believe some guys say it wasn't that bad! I'm sorry but it was terrible. It's not even Thursday yet and some of you Stanzi sympathizers are already getting beer goggles again. He caused the sacks because he held the ball to long. The pick wasn't flukey at all. He's lucky Copper knocked it away and tried to save him. Otherwise, it might have been gone for a pick six because Copper was double covered and Stanzi blatently stared down the receiver all the way.

In the end, Stanzi doesn't move the ball. You have to move the ball. Thigpen moved the ball. Palko and Croyle did not. Thigpen is still in the league. It's really that simple. If Stanzi is going to make it, he needs to move the damn chains.

Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi. Period. The other two were on the Oline, guys having hands on Stanzi in less than 3 seconds.

As far as the interception is concerned. I know you won't b/c you're a dumbass, but if you watch the replay from the rear angle it's obvious pass interference. The db tries to put his hand around Coppers waist to help position himself(which itself is pass interference) but gets a hold of Copper's left elbow in the process not allowing Copper to catch the ball. If Coppers left arm is free, it's most likely an easy catch, and if the db's doesn't put his arm around Copper illegally at all, he never gets into position to bat the ball away. Stanzi's throw was perfect.

[Black Bob]

Originally Posted by aturnis

Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi. Period. The other two were on the Oline, guys having hands on Stanzi in less than 3 seconds.

As far as the interception is concerned. I know you won't b/c you're a dumbass, but if you watch the replay from the rear angle it's obvious pass interference. The db tries to put his hand around Coppers waist to help position himself(which itself is pass interference) but gets a hold of Copper's left elbow in the process not allowing Copper to catch the ball. If Coppers left arm is free, it's most likely an easy catch, and if the db's doesn't put his arm around Copper illegally at all, he never gets into position to bat the ball away. Stanzi's throw was perfect.

Two of the four sacks were on Stanzi? How many would there have been in four quarters? The corner was cheating? Listen to yourself man. It's NFL and Stanzi is going to have to overcome that shit if he wants to play.

[Chiefnj2]

I find it frustrating that KC's young backups always look like crap. It seems like other organizations can get a few good games from their 2nd, 3rd and 4th string.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

I find it frustrating that KC's young backups always look like crap. It seems like other organizations can get a few good games from their 2nd, 3rd and 4th string.

This year it was by design.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by TEX

This year it was by design.

There wasn't any way they were going to take a big risk with Stanzi anyway. Quinn was always going to be the backup.

They've made the "safe" move every step of the way this offseason, from hiring RAC, to bringing in Daboll, to signing Quinn in the first place.

Everything thing have done is conservative, comfortable, and familiar.

[Setsuna]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There wasn't any way they were going to take a big risk with Stanzi anyway. Quinn was always going to be the backup.

They've made the "safe" move every step of the way this offseason, from hiring RAC, to bringing in Daboll, to signing Quinn in the first place.

Everything thing have done is conservative, comfortable, and familiar.

Where have you been?