Why is Blaylock starting this week? - Page 3

Chiefnj · 12-07-2004, 01:26 PM

Why not just give the nod to Johnson since he is under contract for a few more years and played well last week?

Spicy McHaggis · 12-07-2004, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

We don't have enough decent linebackers to run a 4-3, let alone a 3-4.

Pssst, Demonpenz was just joking.

2bikemike · 12-07-2004, 07:30 PM

I admit I did not see the game and only listened to it on the net. But I did not think that the Raiders mounted much of a pass rush. I think the Titans will.

I am not so sure Johnson has the game yet to protect Green like Blaylock will. I think I read somewhere that Bober is out for monday night and either Black or Sampson would start. Meaning Green is going to need all the help he can get.

TEX · 12-07-2004, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius

I think it is more runs inside, instead of runs to the outside. Though he looked just horrible on that sweep for a TD.

I don't understand what the Chiefs are thinking either. The only thing I can think of is that DV is trying to audition Blaylock for other teams because he likes him. Nothing else makes much sense.

Yep, which is on par with this whole off season and regular season not making much sense.

go bo · 12-07-2004, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2bikemike

I admit I did not see the game and only listened to it on the net. But I did not think that the Raiders mounted much of a pass rush. I think the Titans will.

I am not so sure Johnson has the game yet to protect Green like Blaylock will. I think I read somewhere that Bober is out for monday night and either Black or Sampson would start. Meaning Green is going to need all the help he can get.

if black starts, i think we'll be alright...

he's played well in relief of waters and he's the guy who's supposed to take over from roaf, so he should be about as good as wellbourn and bober...

i'd like to see something of sampson, but only when trent has been taken out of a blowout or the like...

philfree · 12-07-2004, 09:49 PM

Blaylock gets the start because he is the better all around RB at this time. LJ will get his snaps though. I like being loaded! At RB I mean

O.K. both

PhilFree

**morphius** · 12-07-2004, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

Blaylock gets the start because he is the better all around RB at this time. LJ will get his snaps though. I like being loaded! At RB I mean

O.K. both

PhilFree

How odd is it that currently Marty has a single stud RB and we are playing RBbC...

Ouch.

Logical · 12-07-2004, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by morphius

How odd is it that currently Marty has a single stud RB and we are playing RBbC...

Ouch.

May you be blessed with KCJohnny at your Christmas party for that post.

12-07-2004, 01:26 PM
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	Why is Blaylock starting this week? Why not just give the nod to Johnson since he is under contract for a few more years and played well last week?
Posts: 6,811

12-07-2004, 07:30 PM	#32
2bikemike Born to Ride Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: NWA Casino cash: $2375377	I admit I did not see the game and only listened to it on the net. But I did not think that the Raiders mounted much of a pass rush. I think the Titans will. I am not so sure Johnson has the game yet to protect Green like Blaylock will. I think I read somewhere that Bober is out for monday night and either Black or Sampson would start. Meaning Green is going to need all the help he can get.
Posts: 16,303

12-07-2004, 09:49 PM	#35
philfree Indian Twitter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Free Agency Casino cash: $1566198	Blaylock gets the start because he is the better all around RB at this time. LJ will get his snaps though. I like being loaded! At RB I mean O.K. both PhilFree __________________ [/SIGPIC]
Posts: 14,985