Chiefs The Joeckeling of SNR - Page 14

Direckshun · 04-03-2013, 09:25 PM

It's happening, bitches.

For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games.

If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR.

If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun.

(This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.)

I am sleepwalking through this one, folks.

I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice

So they're going to be top 5 left tackles.

Because that's the bar.

Albert is in the 5-10 range.

FYI, i don't care what those guys turn out to be. We are fully capable of winning a SB with Branden Albert. Replacing him with 1.1 is stupid as hell, and there's 0 excuse for it.

I don't think Albert is near the top 5. He's closer to 10 than he is to 5.

Zero excuse?

Why because you think they should just pay Brendan Albert what he wants?

Sweet Daddy Hate · 04-04-2013, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

I have my own thread?

hahahahalololol
Posted via Mobile Device

Sweet Daddy Hate · 04-04-2013, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I don't think Albert is near the top 5. He's closer to 10 than he is to 5.

Zero excuse?

Why because you think they should just pay Brendan Albert what he wants?

He certainly didn't earn it...
Posted via Mobile Device

Ace Gunner · 04-04-2013, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

And he doesn't attack. Moves around the edge better than most LTs coming out of college, sure, but I've never seen him have to diagnose two blitzers from the weakside.

Eric Fisher has tape where he's taken BOTH out of the picture. I'm not sure Joeckel would know what the **** to do.

Allow me some time to ponder a retort. I'm bustin ass for the biz lately, so I have not had the spare time I usually do have.

Ace Gunner · 04-04-2013, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I don't think Albert is near the top 5. He's closer to 10 than he is to 5.

Zero excuse?

Why because you think they should just pay Brendan Albert what he wants?

When Albert is traded for a 3rd, this place will go postal.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 04-04-2013, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

When Albert is traded for a 3rd, this place will go postal.

As well it should.
Posted via Mobile Device

Messier · 04-04-2013, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

When Albert is traded for a 3rd, this place will go postal.

I don't think they'll settle for a third. They asked for a second, if they don't get it they'll just keep Albert. They're in a position of strength. They don't need to get rid of him.

Hammock Parties · 04-04-2013, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I don't think Albert is near the top 5. He's closer to 10 than he is to 5.

Irrelevant. You can win a SB with Albert as a LT.

Therefore spending 1.1 on his replacement, regardless of money issues, is incredibly stupid.

It's a Carl Peterson move.

penbrook · 04-04-2013, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice

Irrelevant. You can win a SB with Albert as a LT.

Therefore spending 1.1 on his replacement, regardless of money issues, is incredibly stupid.

It's a Carl Peterson move.

Yes but Carl Peterson even said if he was still the gm Albert would of been signed long term.

Just Passin' By · 04-04-2013, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice

I don't care, it's money.

You said there was 0 excuse. I gave you a simple and valid excuse for the move in a year without elite talent at the top and a LT who seems to be overrating himself.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wonton Prejudice

Irrelevant. You can win a SB with Albert as a LT.

Therefore spending 1.1 on his replacement, regardless of money issues, is incredibly stupid.

It's a Carl Peterson move.

You could win a Sb with a young Jamon Bushrod. You could win a SB with a ton of tackles.

Listen to yourself, "regardless of money issues," there has to be a limit and Alberts asking price is well over what the Chiefs want to pay long term.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Yes but Carl Peterson even said if he was still the gm Albert would of been signed long term.

Bullshit. Carl Peterson never made any long term signing easy.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

As well it should.
Posted via Mobile Device

Why though? Again Albert is a nice player. He's not a world beater contrary to what's said on here.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:11 PM

If I had my way, I'd trade Albert, start Stephenson, sign Clabo and draft Geno.

Ebolapox · 04-04-2013, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ebolapox

I know we bug you constantly for this stuff, but any word on how geno's visit went?

this is the last time I'll bug you on this specifically. seriously, apologies. this has got to get old for you, I'm sorry for asking--just curious.

04-03-2013, 09:25 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4373447	The Joeckeling of SNR It's happening, bitches. For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games. If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR. If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun. (This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.) I am sleepwalking through this one, folks. I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.
Posts: 59,264

04-04-2013, 02:11 PM	#209
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	If I had my way, I'd trade Albert, start Stephenson, sign Clabo and draft Geno. __________________
Posts: 23,212