Chiefs The Joeckeling of SNR - Page 16

Direckshun · 04-03-2013, 09:25 PM

It's happening, bitches.

For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games.

If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR.

If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun.

(This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.)

I am sleepwalking through this one, folks.

I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.

ChiefsCountry · 04-04-2013, 02:38 PM

Only the ****ing Chiefs would get the first overall pick and use it on a ****ing LT that isn't even the best lineman on his college team and trade for Alex Smith. Same shit, different people.

RyFo18 · 04-04-2013, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

Big fan of the Fishman, huh?

I'm pretty impartial to he or Joeckel...Just saying b/c this bet is re: Joeckel.

ChiefsCountry · 04-04-2013, 02:40 PM

I really want to know what these ****head NFL people see in Luke Jockel. He is a decent LT propsect, a sure first rounder but he is not some amazing LT god that deserves to go #1 overall. Matt Kahili last year is ten times the prospect this fool is.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Only the ****ing Chiefs would get the first overall pick and use it on a ****ing LT that isn't even the best lineman on his college team and trade for Alex Smith. Same shit, different people.

I think the regime deserves the chance for the whole picture to play out before they get tar and feathered.

penbrook · 04-04-2013, 02:42 PM

Kiper says Fisher the best when facing good teams but his struggles came in lesser competition.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

I really want to know what these ****head NFL people see in Luke Jockel. He is a decent LT propsect, a sure first rounder but he is not some amazing LT god that deserves to go #1 overall. Matt Kahili last year is ten times the prospect this fool is.

Gotta pick someone #1 in a class that's about as top heavy as Kate Bosworth.

Setsuna · 04-04-2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

They'd probably be better off trading the pick to a team like the Raiders (I know, but it's just an example) for a 2nd this year and their 1st next year. I'd certainly give the Jaguars a call about the idea.

We don't bail teams out of stupid moves anymore. Stick with the Faid.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Kiper says Fisher the best when facing good teams but his struggles came in lesser competition.

Honest question, did you watch any college football and form your own opinions about players?

penbrook · 04-04-2013, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Honest question, did you watch any college football and form your own opinions about players?

Yes but I dont pay attention to the lineman.

**The Bad Guy** · 04-04-2013, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Yes but I dont pay attention to the lineman.

Fair enough.

penbrook · 04-04-2013, 02:45 PM

Kiper said something smart. He said in a normal draft Joeckel would be a mid to late first round pick but hes #1 because you got to pick someone.

Setsuna · 04-04-2013, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

It's funny watching you post like you know what the **** you are talking about.

Kalil had a great rookie year.

You hush boy. I noticed the Vikings had a top 5 passing offense....oh wait no they didn't. What good did he do? I'll wait.

Just Passin' By · 04-04-2013, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna

We don't bail teams out of stupid moves anymore. Stick with the Faid.

Until they prove they've changed, the Jaguars are still the team that drafted Blaine Gabbert and let him start NFL games.

RyFo18 · 04-04-2013, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna

You hush boy. I noticed the Vikings had a top 5 passing offense....oh wait no they didn't. What good did he do? I'll wait.

lolwut?

I will second that Kalil played very well in 2012.

Sassy Squatch · 04-04-2013, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Setsuna

You hush boy. I noticed the Vikings had a top 5 passing offense....oh wait no they didn't. What good did he do? I'll wait.

Yikes. Are you Bosschiefs son?

04-03-2013, 09:25 PM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4383447	The Joeckeling of SNR It's happening, bitches. For the 2013 regular season, SNR argues that rookie tackle Luke Joeckel will be responsible for allowing no fewer than 7.0 sacks, so long as he starts at least 14 games. If he is responsible for 7.0 sacks or more during this timespan, Direckshun will have his username changed to SNR's Bitch, along with a new avatar and tagline, and work in various phrases about how cool SNR is into every one of his posts from the conclusion of Week 17 to Feb. 15th, along with transferring all his casino cash to SNR. If Joeckel actually plays like a goddamn top rated tackle, however, and is responsible for fewer than 7.0 sacks during that timespan, SNR will have to tailor each one of his posts from Week 17 to Feb. 15th in a manner to be determined later by Direckshun, along with transferring all his casino cash to Direckshun. (This bet can be reviewed as of April 25th if Luke Joeckel is drafted by any of the other 31 teams in the NFL, and can be modified on that date. It is also invalidated by Joeckel failing to start 14 games.) I am sleepwalking through this one, folks. I will take any and all suggestions for the style in which SNR should have to post.
Posts: 59,262

04-04-2013, 02:38 PM	#226
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $2328752	Only the **ing Chiefs would get the first overall pick and use it on a **ing LT that isn't even the best lineman on his college team and trade for Alex Smith. Same shit, different people.
Posts: 49,595

04-04-2013, 02:40 PM	#228
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $2328752	I really want to know what these ****head NFL people see in Luke Jockel. He is a decent LT propsect, a sure first rounder but he is not some amazing LT god that deserves to go #1 overall. Matt Kahili last year is ten times the prospect this fool is.
Posts: 49,595

04-04-2013, 02:42 PM	#230
penbrook LEGEND! Join Date: Feb 2013 Casino cash: $10033840	Kiper says Fisher the best when facing good teams but his struggles came in lesser competition.
Posts: 16,409

04-04-2013, 02:45 PM	#236
penbrook LEGEND! Join Date: Feb 2013 Casino cash: $10033840	Kiper said something smart. He said in a normal draft Joeckel would be a mid to late first round pick but hes #1 because you got to pick someone.
Posts: 16,409