|
|
01-28-2013, 10:49 AM | #1 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10269900
|
Quote:
Yes, lighter strings and a lower action might lead to quicker results. I can also say from personal experience that it fosters bad habits. Futhermore, now that I play my electric in B standard with 12-56 strings, the time I spent on the acoustic is invaluable. Switching from 8's or 9's to these would be very hard to do simply from a finger wear/fatigue standpoint. They're chunky. And my youngest daughter had a strabismus. She had to wear a path over her eye for 2 years. How dare you! |
|
Posts: 100,022
|
01-28-2013, 11:31 AM | #2 | |
MFIC
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tromsø, Norway
Casino cash: $3829219
|
Quote:
I learned on an electric with 8's and moved on to acoustic later. BTW - I'm sorry about your daughter's strabismus, (I had to look that up). I hope she's better now. |
|
Posts: 7,771
|
01-28-2013, 11:43 AM | #3 | |
'Tis my eye!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Chiefsplanet
Casino cash: $10269900
|
Quote:
I would start on an acoustic because I think it teaches better technique if and when she chooses to pursue it further, say classical guitar in college. The last thing I want is for her guitar playing to turn out like mine! |
|
Posts: 100,022
|
|
|