Matt Cassel named AFC Offensive Player of the Month

[Stinger]

Matt Cassel named AFC Offensive Player of the Month; 1st #Chiefs QB since Steve Deberg in Sept. 1990 to win the honor.

http://twitter.com/JoshLooney

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QB MATT CASSEL NAMED AFC OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE MONTH

By PR Staff

Cassel is just the second Chiefs quarterback to ever win the honor

The National Football League informed the Chiefs on Thursday that QB Matt Cassel has been named the AFC Offensive Player of the Month for November.

Cassel is just the second Chiefs quarterback to ever win the honor, joining QB Steve DeBerg who did it in September of ’90. Cassel is the first Chiefs player to be named AFC Player of the Month since RB Larry Johnson in December/January of the 2005 season.

Cassel (6-4, 230) completed 90 of 144 passes (62.5%) for 1,111 yards with 12 TDs and only one INT for a 111.2 passer rating in November. His 12 TD passes led the league during the month, while his passer rating ranked third in the NFL over that span. He has recorded three straight games with a 100.0+ rating and produced a pair of games with four TD passes in November. Cassel threw for a career-high 469 yards at Denver (12/5). He currently leads the NFL with a 6.81 TD percentage (min. 250 attempts) on the season. Cassel also has a +18 touchdown-to-interception differential, the second-best mark in the NFL.

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/article...f-dbcbf2dd9506

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cassel's November numbers: 90 of 144 (62.5%) for 1,111 yards with 12 TDs and only 1 INT (111.2 rating). 12 TDs were an NFL high.

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

didnt the media bring up mvp?
Posted via Mobile Device

If they did, they're idiots. He isn't even the MVP of the team.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

This is false logic. He might not come through in this game. That doesn't mean he isn't 'the guy' necessarily.

Funny. Myself and others have been accused of moving the goalpost. This is exactly what you're doing here. Except, you're moving them in.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

The standard of proof is so low around here it's mind boggling.

If you want to use that argument you need to think it through 1st. There were WAY more people who were saying Matty would suck this season than he would be good. Where were your demands for proof then?

Please if you are going to preach about proof, think about it 1st.

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

If you want to use that argument you need to think it through 1st. There were WAY more people who were saying Matty would suck this season than he would be good. Where were your demands for proof then?

Please if you are going to preach about proof, think about it 1st.

The 16 previous games? The first several of this season? OTAs? Minicamps? Preseason?

Do you put Drano in your neti pot?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

I would say 'bull crap' to you sir. No one is saying he is a "big time QB" yet. You can point out an exception or two, but that doesn't make the rule.

You can find a couple people who will say anything, but that doesn't mean they represent the majority. The VAST majority of Chiefs Fans or NFL Fans would NOT proclaim Matty a "Big Time" QB just yet.

JASONSAUTO goes on your list of an exception or two?

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by BCD

Funny. Myself and others have been accused of moving the goalpost. This is exactly what you're doing here. Except, you're moving them in.

Oh really? I am not the one saying how getting to the playoffs is the standard by which I will measure Matty.

I have said since APRIL that I don't think we will make the playoffs.

Did you think we were gonna make the playoffs back in April?

It is people who NOW claim that the standard is 'making the playoffs' who have moved the goalposts.

My standards have not changed since April.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Do you put Drano in your neti pot?

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

The 16 previous games? The first several of this season? OTAs? Minicamps? Preseason?

Do you put Drano in your neti pot?

Circular Logic. I did not think the previous 16 games were an indication (proof) of Matty's potential back in April. I argued this and was berated for suggesting that perhaps there were ALSO other flaws with this team that prevented Matty from performing up to his potential.

If you thought the previous 16 games were proof, then obviously you were WRONG. Weren't you?

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

Circular Logic. I did not think the previous 16 games were an indication (proof) of Matty's potential back in April. I argued this and was berated for suggesting that perhaps there were ALSO other flaws with this team that prevented Matty from performing up to his potential.

If you thought the previous 16 games were proof, then obviously you were WRONG. Weren't you?

You don't even know what a tautology is. Although past results do not indicate future performance, they are a far more accurate indicator than "I hope he does b/c of the Arrowhead."

Furthermore, you lose your logical fallacy playing card, because you aren't even smart enough to realize that you are using an extremely small sample size to validate an entire player's career.

20 games and two offseasons? Makes sense. 2 games? **** off.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by cdcox

JASONSAUTO goes on your list of an exception or two?

link from the last 2 months?
Posted via Mobile Device

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by cdcox

JASONSAUTO goes on your list of an exception or two?

I have no idea but if he claims that Matty is a "Big Time" Qb already, then yes he is an exception.

Let me explain this to you slowly, because clearly you are stupid.

When most believe one thing....that is the majority.

Those who believe something else are the exceptions.

Most people would not call Matt Cassel a "Big Time NFL QB" , those who do are the exception.

I hope that clears it up for you, but perhaps you should go to

http://www.wonderlandcamp.org/about.htm

If you still don't get it.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by cdcox

If they did, they're idiots. He isn't even the MVP of the team.

thatp where that talk came from. and ftr i think its silly at this point but that could change
Posted via Mobile Device

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

link from the last 2 months?
Posted via Mobile Device

Okay, misunderstood your post, you are off the list.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

You don't even know what a tautology is. Although past results do not indicate future performance, they are a far more accurate indicator than "I hope he does b/c of the Arrowhead."

Furthermore, you lose your logical fallacy playing card, because you aren't even smart enough to realize that you are using an extremely small sample size to validate an entire player's career.

20 games and two offseasons? Makes sense. 2 games? **** off.

You can throw out all the big words you want but it doesnt make you any less WRONG. I am not the one who had to show any burden of proof, as I was not making the claims that 'Cassel Sucks.'

Whatever proof you used, no matter how good YOU thought the evidence was.....You were still wrong.

Matt Castle does not suck, your analysis of the evidence does. When will you get that?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

I have no idea but if he claims that Matty is a "Big Time" Qb already, then yes he is an exception.

Let me explain this to you slowly, because clearly you are stupid.

When most believe one thing....that is the majority.

Those who believe something else are the exceptions.

Most people would not call Matt Cassel a "Big Time NFL QB" , those who do are the exception.

I hope that clears it up for you, but perhaps you should go to

http://www.wonderlandcamp.org/about.htm

If you still don't get it.

I know what an exception is.

But you said "an exception or two." That means less than 3 people.