|
08-17-2011, 03:11 PM | #2 |
Hello
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Dakota
Casino cash: $1032096
VARSITY
|
|
Posts: 23,224
|
08-17-2011, 03:18 PM | #3 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2959099
|
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
Posts: 60,498
|
08-18-2011, 07:30 AM | #4 |
Hello
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Dakota
Casino cash: $1032096
VARSITY
|
Just reminding everyone that i've got this league chalked up as a 1st place for me.
|
Posts: 23,224
|
08-18-2011, 08:28 AM | #5 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2320208
|
My Fantasy Football team made great strides last year, and I'm confident in my kickass abilities to assemble a puppy-raping team.
But that schedule. It's just too tough. There are 5 games at the end there where it's murderous. Prepare to be overly fearful for nothing when you encounter My Team Needs Another Year. Because if you let us, we will beat you. |
Posts: 90,475
|
08-19-2011, 05:19 PM | #6 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $4254563
|
I'm drafting nothing but QB's. **** yeah! It's called innovation bitches.
__________________
Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever. |
Posts: 64,355
|
08-20-2011, 05:52 AM | #7 |
FINALLY! The wait is over.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Future Is Now!!!
Casino cash: $19947565
|
Tebow's Foreskin Moccasins are gonna **** you up Dawg.
|
Posts: 56,649
|
08-20-2011, 02:13 PM | #8 |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $4333447
|
Thanks for the invite.
|
Posts: 59,282
|
08-21-2011, 02:57 PM | #9 |
a haw haw haw
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MIZZOU
Casino cash: $26365802
|
I'd gladly pay a fine for an endzone celebration in that....
TD'S-N-BEER!
__________________
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things have become new. |
Posts: 27,111
|
08-22-2011, 08:56 AM | #10 |
Hello
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Dakota
Casino cash: $1032096
VARSITY
|
I'm drafting nothing but speed. Pure, untalented, no hands speed. Heyward-Bey is as good as mine unless one of you assholes takes him in the top 6.
|
Posts: 23,224
|
08-22-2011, 11:48 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
posted this in a thread on the league board:
I won't chirp on this too much, but I do think 1 QB leagues totally devalue the position. I think the RB/WR spot should be an OP spot (QB, RB, WR, or TE) so teams can start 2 QB's if they so choose. 1 QB leagues make spot starting Matt Cassel acceptable and not drafting a premiere QB good strategy... I don't understand why people like to start 2010 Willis McGahee praying he'll get a touchdown (because they have no choice otherwise) while Joe Flacco and Matt Ryan are on someone's bench... I used to love traditional FFL but being a passing league now (more so than when this shot got popular 15 years ago), the game has evolved...12 teams X potential to start 24 QB's (rather than 12) makes things a whole hell of a lot more strategic/competitive/entertaining... (but all of my other leagues are ran this way so if you guys are against it I won't complain - though I do think you should try out an OP position league one time and I doubt you'd ever want to play a different setting) |
Posts: 56,356
|
08-22-2011, 11:54 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
all I'm saying it...
a real NFL team starts 1 QB, 1 RB and 2 WR's... in this league, we have to start at least 24 RB's and 24 WR's... and then we have to start another combination of 12 RB's or WR's... yet we only start 12 QB's? that just doesn't make sense to me...why wouldn't we even it out and start 12 QB's, 24 RB's, 24 WR's and then a combination of 12 more QB's, RB's, WR's or TE's... doesn't that make more sense? I just don't like FFL where Joe Flacco, Sam Bradford, Matthew Stafford, Kevin Kolb, Jay Cutler, Matt Cassel, Mark Sanchez, Colt McCoy, Donovan McNabb, Cam Newton, Kyle Orton, David Garrard, Matt Hasselbeck, Jason Campbell, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Chad Henne, Alex Smith, Tavaris Jackson, etc. etc. etc. don't even have to be thought of because you only have to start 1 QB. |
Posts: 56,356
|
08-22-2011, 11:57 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
the ability to start 2 QB's (if you desire) makes everything so much more strategic...
do you play Felix Jones as your flex if he has a good matchup, or do you play it safe and go with Matt Cassel? etc. etc. etc. so many more options, so much more strategy, and a much more unpredictable draft... the way the league is set up now... there is no other choice then following this: http://games.espn.go.com/ffl/livedra...s?position=ALL and hoping to hit on some sleepers... Standard has been studied too much and is way too easy now...OP leagues (where you can start 2 QB's) is what FFL is now...and where it'll be in a few years once everyone realizes the game has evolved. |
Posts: 56,356
|
08-22-2011, 12:11 PM | #14 | |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $2320208
|
Quote:
Lower-round QBs might be undervalued, but I'm fine with that. I'd much rather see keen fantasy strategy being devoted to finding sleepers at RB, WR, and even TE rather than QB. It's too damn easy to pick a 2nd QB out of one's asshole. |
|
Posts: 90,475
|
08-22-2011, 12:20 PM | #15 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2959099
|
Auction leagues are the next era of FFL, IMO.
It will be exceedingly rare that it's ever a good idea to start a WR/RB over a 2nd QB if that's an available option. It doesn't add a lot more strategy, IMO, it just adds another 'must have' style player. At that point, the 2nd QB becomes similar to the 3rd RB to play at the flex spots in the olden days. If you tried to plug a WR in at flex, you may get lucky for a week or 2, but the guys that plugged in an RB there came out well ahead. It would be the same situation here - everyone would be in a scramble to get the best 'flex' QB. I'm not sure you've improved the league, just changed its character. In a 12 man league, it's absolutely possible to get left holding the bag at QB. If you really want to face an opponent that's throwing Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers while you're left choosing between Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco as your signal caller - more power to you. The QB position goes a legit 9 deep with 3 or 4 'wildcard' QBs that may go off this season. If you're stuck without one, you're boned. Adding a 2nd QB seems like an attempt to make the league artificially deep - you're essentially trying to make a 24 team league out of a 12-man, at least as it relates to the QB position. If you want to add strategy, create it as an auction league with a nominal FAAB. Give everyone a short bench and limit weekly roster moves and you'll see plenty of strategy.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
Posts: 60,498
|
|
|