|
04-28-2011, 10:01 PM | #2 |
Say hello to my little friend
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Larryville
Casino cash: $9598422
|
Not too sure about the Tits being losers. IMO, Locker is going to be better than Gabbert.
The Vikings though. What a ****ing fire drill. |
Posts: 47,314
|
04-28-2011, 10:01 PM | #3 |
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $2714127
|
It's nice to have 2 years in a row where our 1st round picks were not wasted on reaches and dreams
|
Posts: 128,052
|
04-28-2011, 10:01 PM | #4 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
how can the eagles not be losers after how the planet talked about their pick all day?
Ravens not making a pick repeals losing too Posted via Mobile Device |
Posts: 55,715
|
04-28-2011, 10:02 PM | #5 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Wouldn't put the Saints in the winners category because of what they gave up.
|
Posts: 47,521
|
04-28-2011, 10:02 PM | #6 |
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $2714127
|
|
Posts: 128,052
|
04-28-2011, 10:03 PM | #7 |
Go Beavers!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Warshington
Casino cash: $5608243
|
I don't think I would classify the Falcons as winners. They gave up a lot for a position that wasn't a need.
|
Posts: 14,500
|
04-28-2011, 10:03 PM | #8 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Casino cash: $2537050
|
The Ravens got a typical Ravens pick....I'm not sure Atlanta is a winner Jones is nice and all but not for all they gave up.
|
Posts: 110,994
|
04-28-2011, 10:03 PM | #9 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $4861115
|
Quote:
You might have missed a post I made explaining it, at least IMO. A team like Philly, Indy, Jets, etc - a team who is built to win now can take a chance on a 27 year old rookie. A team like KC, who still has a LOT of holes, shouldn't, under any circumstances. |
|
Posts: 60,265
|
04-28-2011, 10:03 PM | #10 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
The Seahawks? . Oh, the mother****ing Seahawks. Selected my fourth-round RT from the mock in the first. Thank you, Seattle, for allowing me to win the mock.
|
Posts: 47,521
|
04-28-2011, 10:03 PM | #11 |
legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Independence, MO
Casino cash: $-1617903
|
vikes and chiefs and saints big winnas!
|
Posts: 28,376
|
04-28-2011, 10:04 PM | #12 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $4861115
|
|
Posts: 60,265
|
04-28-2011, 10:05 PM | #13 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
Quote:
And yeah I missed that post Posted via Mobile Device |
|
Posts: 55,715
|
04-28-2011, 10:05 PM | #14 |
Greatest QB Duo of 2015
Join Date: Mar 2010
Casino cash: $2501133
|
Browns are a winner, IMO.
Same with the Chiefs. Losers: Falcons Saints Panthers Titans Seahawks |
Posts: 17,088
|
04-28-2011, 10:06 PM | #15 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $4861115
|
Quote:
Nick Saban's reaction was ****ing priceless. |
|
Posts: 60,265
|
|
|