Should we post our vacation pictures on Chiefs Planet?

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

CC with a cop-like power trip?

No way.

"I'll catch up to you" sounds like a threat to me. I stand by that, and I know Phobia wouldn't say anything about it because he's so closely watched over by the "people".

But it's nothing like a power trip. sooooo, what ever.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

"I'll catch up to you" sounds like a threat to me. I stand by that, and I know Phobia wouldn't say anything about it because he's so closely watched over by the "people".

But it's nothing like a power trip. sooooo, what ever.

So you're blind as well?

There is a difference between 'I'll' and 'It'll'.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

So you're blind as well?

There is a difference between 'I'll' and 'It'll'.

no, I just missed the "t" this last time. "It'll catch up to you" sounded threatening to me. All moot points anyway, you do know that, right?

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

no, I just missed the "t" this last time. "It'll catch up to you" sounded threatening to me. All moot points anyway, you do know that, right?

No. You don't understand the English language.

"It'll catch up you to" implies there's some sort of cosmic karma that will eventually pay dividends for good or bad deeds.

"I'll catch up you" means somebody or someone is actively seeking someone else and they will find them.

Any other random string of words that threaten you?

[|Zach|]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

No. You don't understand the English language.

"It'll catch up you to" implies there's some sort of cosmic karma that will eventually pay dividends for good or bad deeds.

"I'll catch up you" means somebody or someone is actively seeking someone else and they will find them.

Any other random string of words that threaten you?

This is not nearly as funny as kcchiefsfan not knowing the difference between hindsight being 50\50 and something coming in 20\20 but it is still enjoyable.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

No. You don't understand the English language.

"It'll catch up you to" implies there's some sort of cosmic karma that will eventually pay dividends for good or bad deeds.

"I'll catch up you" means somebody or someone is actively seeking someone else and they will find them.

Any other random string of words that threaten you?

I was reading the conversation in that thread, and I found it to read of a threatening nature. That was the point to having the infraction system to begin with. I have the very first infraction ever given and it was given by Austin himself. I have a good grasp on the concept.

Words alone don't dictate intent, and without tone of voice like real life, typed words can hide intent sometimes.

Again, though, I ask to what point you wish to make on this topic? That infraction did nothing to imminem but ruffle his feathers a little, and not even deduct rep points like a neg rep would have.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

I have a good grasp on the concept.

Yeah, you have a good grasp of how to abuse authority, copper.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning

Yeah, you have a good grasp of how to abuse authority, copper.

I'm thinking you don't have a good grasp on the concept of authority, nor of it's abuse.

[Pablo]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

I was reading the conversation in that thread, and I found it to read of a threatening nature. That was the point to having the infraction system to begin with. I have the very first infraction ever given and it was given by Austin himself. I have a good grasp on the concept.

Words alone don't dictate intent, and without tone of voice like real life, typed words can hide intent sometimes.

Again, though, I ask to what point you wish to make on this topic? That infraction did nothing to imminem but ruffle his feathers a little, and not even deduct rep points like a neg rep would have.

If the infraction did nothing but ruffle his feathers then why was it ever given? Couldn't you have made your feelings known in a post in that thread? Oh that's right; because if you receive a certain number of infractions in a certain time period they can be parlayed into a banning.

Didn't you get your infraction privileges revoked for abusing said system you understand so well at some point?

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

If the infraction did nothing but ruffle his feathers then why was it ever given? Couldn't you have made your feelings known in a post in that thread? Oh that's right; because if you receive a certain number of infractions in a certain time period they can be parlayed into a banning.

Didn't you get your infraction privileges revoked for abusing said system you understand so well at some point?

I already said if others felt that post was threatening, then the infractions would serve their purpose. But in no way do I think the infraction system is some sort of authority, it was an extra tool, that has it's uses, for contributors.

I had it taken away because I think Hootie and Clayton aren't the type of posters to make this place a fun place to come to, IE - I don't see the entertainment value of being a douchebag. I used up my money's worth of "power". LOL.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

I was reading the conversation in that thread, and I found it to read of a threatening nature. That was the point to having the infraction system to begin with. I have the very first infraction ever given and it was given by Austin himself. I have a good grasp on the concept.

Words alone don't dictate intent, and without tone of voice like real life, typed words can hide intent sometimes.

Again, though, I ask to what point you wish to make on this topic? That infraction did nothing to imminem but ruffle his feathers a little, and not even deduct rep points like a neg rep would have.

I'm pretty sure I've never seen you report a post that needed reported or infract someone for a legit reason, so no, you don't have a good grasp of the concept.

[NewChief]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I'm pretty sure I've never seen you report a post that needed reported or infract someone for a legit reason, so no, you don't have a good grasp of the concept.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I'm pretty sure I've never seen you report a post that needed reported or infract someone for a legit reason, so no, you don't have a good grasp of the concept.

I'm pretty sure you can look up all of my infractions given. So I guess I'll just go ahead and believe that not a single one of those posts received an infraction from another poster or mod action... oh wait, if you DO research it, you'll prove yourself wrong.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

I'm pretty sure I've never seen you report a post that needed reported or infract someone for a legit reason, so no, you don't have a good grasp of the concept.

you said I never used it for a legit reason. I said I had. Even only using the last years stats, where I admitted I used it "illegally" I still used it for a legit reason. That was my only point and you proved it, but acted like you didn't.

What's your beef with me anyway?