NL grass looks greener now

ChiefsCountry · 06-10-2007, 12:00 PM

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/story/143959.html

Article about the Royals switching to the NL when they had the chance. Personally I was glad that the Royals stayed in American League. Just seeing what other fans opinions of it were.

Silock · 06-10-2007, 12:35 PM

Well, our pitchers can't be any worse at batting than the rest of the team...

Abba-Dabba · 06-10-2007, 12:39 PM

Speaking from firsthand experience, yes, the NL's grass is greener.

cookster50 · 06-10-2007, 01:00 PM

NL = real baseball
AL = fake, wannabe baseball with a DH

shakesthecat · 06-10-2007, 01:03 PM

Worst decision ever

tk13 · 06-10-2007, 01:09 PM

Eh, it's all pretty much hindsight. It's not like the Brewers have torn up that division in the last decade either. I do agree that I bet we'd be a lot closer to .500 against that division now though.

That said, it's still all in hindsight, because just now is the NL Central a crap division. For the longest time the AL Central was the weakest division, and the NL Central had the Cards, Astros... the Cubs with Prior and Wood, etc.

Pitt Gorilla · 06-10-2007, 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damark

NL = real baseball
AL = fake, wannabe baseball with a DH

I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. I'd much rather see a hitter hit than a pitcher flail.

PinkFloyd · 06-10-2007, 01:40 PM

I think attendance wise it would have helped... You could probably be sure the K would have been sold out everytime the Cards or Cubs came to town for a weekend series...

As far as more wins, eh -- not too sure about that... It could be possible I guess... Change can always be good, or be the death of you...

MIAdragon · 06-10-2007, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. I'd much rather see a hitter hit than a pitcher flail.

Im with you, that automatic out is such an integral part of the game

HolmeZz · 06-10-2007, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. I'd much rather see a hitter hit than a pitcher flail.

It makes for much more strategy. Being the fan of an NL team, it's made me appreciate baseball a lot more.

**DaneMcCloud** · 06-10-2007, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I don't understand this line of reasoning at all. I'd much rather see a hitter hit than a pitcher flail.

It's a dumb rule. The Pitcher should hit. Some are actually good at it and it makes for a more compelling game. And less old guys who can't do anything but take a big swing and sit down.

ChiefsCountry · 06-10-2007, 02:41 PM

I like the strategy involved with the double switches and all for the NL, but it takes away from the game IMO. I mean sometimes you have to pull the pictcher bc he will have to hit and vice versa. Personally I think its what team and league you grew up with in what you like to watch.

06-10-2007, 12:00 PM
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $2328752	NL grass looks greener now http://www.kansascity.com/sports/story/143959.html Article about the Royals switching to the NL when they had the chance. Personally I was glad that the Royals stayed in American League. Just seeing what other fans opinions of it were.
Posts: 49,605

06-10-2007, 12:35 PM	#2
Silock MVP Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Overland Park Casino cash: $10020882	Well, our pitchers can't be any worse at batting than the rest of the team...
Posts: 19,908

06-10-2007, 12:39 PM	#3
Abba-Dabba MVP Join Date: May 2001 Casino cash: $4502970	Speaking from firsthand experience, yes, the NL's grass is greener.
Posts: 18,144

06-10-2007, 01:00 PM	#4
cookster50 Supreme Commander of My House Join Date: Apr 2004 Casino cash: $3173622	NL = real baseball AL = fake, wannabe baseball with a DH
Posts: 3,431

06-10-2007, 01:03 PM	#5
shakesthecat Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: IA Casino cash: $4293833	Worst decision ever
Posts: 3,353

06-10-2007, 01:09 PM	#6
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $1992500	Eh, it's all pretty much hindsight. It's not like the Brewers have torn up that division in the last decade either. I do agree that I bet we'd be a lot closer to .500 against that division now though. That said, it's still all in hindsight, because just now is the NL Central a crap division. For the longest time the AL Central was the weakest division, and the NL Central had the Cards, Astros... the Cubs with Prior and Wood, etc.
Posts: 54,946

06-10-2007, 01:40 PM	#8
PinkFloyd I've Become - Comfortably Numb Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Cameron, Missouri Casino cash: $10003795	I think attendance wise it would have helped... You could probably be sure the K would have been sold out everytime the Cards or Cubs came to town for a weekend series... As far as more wins, eh -- not too sure about that... It could be possible I guess... Change can always be good, or be the death of you... __________________ Sometimes I lie awake at night, and I ask, 'Where have I gone wrong?' Then a voice says to me, 'This is going to take more than one night.'
Posts: 3,089

06-10-2007, 02:41 PM	#12
ChiefsCountry The Insider Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Lake of the Ozarks Casino cash: $2328752	I like the strategy involved with the double switches and all for the NL, but it takes away from the game IMO. I mean sometimes you have to pull the pictcher bc he will have to hit and vice versa. Personally I think its what team and league you grew up with in what you like to watch.
Posts: 49,605