JWhit doubles down on Guns, NRA, KKK

[Ultra Peanut]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Like Kitchen knives? or hammers or hatchets or axes? silly us.

Yes, indeedy, you can kill people with just about anything. How many of those items allow you to kill a loved one in the heat of an argument from across the room?

Whatever. Guns are a religion in the US and absolutely nothing can convince True Believers. I get it.

Like, I'm not suggesting we ban guns or anything. That's functionally impossible and I understand that. But this incessant clutching of pearls whenever someone says, "Hey guys, guns can be a pretty shitty thing to add to a lot of situations" is intolerably pathetic. You have what you want, no one's taking your guns. Stop being enormous babies about it.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

Yes, indeedy, you can kill people with just about anything. How many of those items allow you to kill a loved one in the heat of an argument from across the room?

Whatever. Guns are a religion in the US. I get it.

Not sure, how many, but I would guess anything sharp enough or heavy enough to throw would do the trick. Given that he was an NFL player, Im going to guess he needed nothing but his bare hands. But, yeah, I get it too...it has nothing to do with the act, but the political motivation of some.

[Goldmember]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Not sure, how many, but I would guess anything sharp enough or heavy enough to throw would do the trick. Given that he was an NFL player, Im going to guess he needed nothing but his bare hands. But, yeah, I get it too...it has nothing to do with the act, but the political motivation of some.

Actually, IMO, killing someone with a gun is less personal than with your bare hands or stabbing them to death. It's faster and more effective, in most cases.

[Ultra Peanut]

Originally Posted by Goldmember

Actually, IMO, killing someone with a gun is less personal than with your bare hands or stabbing them to death. It's faster and more effective, in most cases.

No see, guns are EXACTLY THE SAME as knives. How dare you suggest otherwise!

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by Goldmember

Actually, IMO, killing someone with a gun is less personal than with your bare hands or stabbing them to death. It's faster and more effective, in most cases.

You're right...and then why would anyone want to do so, is the question. A normal, sane law abiding citizen is not going to just go out and 'off' someone for no reason.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Ultra Peanut

Like, I'm not suggesting we ban guns or anything. That's functionally impossible and I understand that. But this incessant clutching of pearls whenever someone says, "Hey guys, guns can be a pretty shitty thing to add to a lot of situations" is intolerably pathetic. You have what you want, no one's taking your guns. Stop being enormous babies about it.

Stop being babies about it?

That's ****ing rich.

Every time there is a crime involving a gun, you liberals cannot wait to inject your ****ing agenda. Go crawl up Bob Costas' ass.

No group cries more than the anti-gun crowd.

[FlaChief58]

Originally Posted by Dave

Stop being babies about it?

That's ****ing rich.

Every time there is a crime involving a gun, you liberals cannot wait to inject your ****ing agenda. Go crawl up Bob Costas' ass.

No group cries more than the anti-gun crowd.

This. Belcher's head was so ****ed up that he felt the need to do what he did. The gun was simply a tool used to commit a terrible crime but, not having a gun would not have prevented it. He had it in his mind that she needed to die and could have just as easily used a knife, bat, hammer, car or a thousand other inanimate objects to do it.

[BIG_DADDY]

Originally Posted by Dave

Stop being babies about it?

That's ****ing rich.

Every time there is a crime involving a gun, you liberals cannot wait to inject your ****ing agenda. Go crawl up Bob Costas' ass.

No group cries more than the anti-gun crowd.

Um, he lost his ability to inject.