If not #1, where?

[Strongside]

Gil Brandt says he isn't worth the #1 but picks him to go #3 to the Raiders. ****ing. Idiot.

If he's worth it at three, are we really reaching?

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Strongside

Gil Brandt says he isn't worth the #1 but picks him to go #3 to the Raiders. ****ing. Idiot.

If he's worth it at three, are we really reaching?

What a dumbass.

He's good enough at #3 but not 1?

Ugh, the draft cannot come soon enough.

[Micjones]

Originally Posted by Strongside

Gil Brandt says he isn't worth the #1 but picks him to go #3 to the Raiders. ****ing. Idiot.

If he's worth it at three, are we really reaching?

Yes. If you think the draft value chart is meaningful.
Still...I'd take him without blinking.

No one will give a shit about the draft value you saved three years later when Smith's a Pro Bowler and you're still looking for a quarterback.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Micjones

Yes. If you think the draft value chart is meaningful.

I don't.

It's as outdated as leather helmets to me.