Ellen Page is gay

[Hammock Parties]

Well, that's interesting.

http://gawker.com/ellen-page-comes-o...ium=socialflow

Actress Ellen Page publicly came out as gay Friday evening, while giving a speech at Time to THRIVE, a national LGBTQ youth conference held in Las Vegas.

"I'm here today because I am gay," Page told the assembled crowd, which responded with a standing ovation and a long chorus of cheers.

"Whoo!" said Page, before continuing:

"And because maybe I can make a difference. To help others have an easier and more hopeful time. Regardless, for me, I feel a personal obligation and a social responsibility.

I also do it selfishly because I'm tired of hiding and I'm tired of lying by omission. I suffered for years because I was scared to be out. My spirit suffered, my mental health suffered, and my relationships suffered. And I'm standing here today with all of you on the other side of that pain."

Page is most famous for becoming pregnant by her awkward classmate Michael Cera, and for invading the dreams of a stranger alongside Leonardo DiCaprio, neither of which happened in real life, because she is an actress.

After her speech, the Human Rights Campaign, which organized the conference, congratulated Page on the front page of its website for "her brave decision to live openly and authentically."

[houstonwhodat]

Originally Posted by loochy

Johnny Weir....EVIL!!!

homo queen

[Bowser]

Originally Posted by Donger

If think that if nature was going to make homosexuality the norm, she would have done so by now.

Maybe it has been, albeit on a much smaller scale than the whole of creation. The "norm" of society was to see homosexuals as something wrong or evil for thousands of years, and just recently have homosexuals even been recognized as anything other than vile creatures suffering from some defective programming.

Speculating on that is way over my pay grade, however. As I said, I'm no biologist.

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Quit being such a ****ing idiot. You just judged me with your post, you tool. And calling something abnormal isn't the same as calling it bad.

Your mother should have swallowed.

A bit touchy today huh?

judgmental prick is judgmental.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by KC native

A bit touchy today huh?

judgmental prick is judgmental.

And again you judge while attacking others when you think they're judging. I love your willingness to be a complete hypocrite, though. You set the bar for everyone else.




And, seriously, your mother should have swallowed.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Bowser

Maybe it has been, albeit on a much smaller scale than the whole of creation. The "norm" of society was to see homosexuals as something wrong or evil for thousands of years, and just recently have homosexuals even been recognized as anything other than vile creatures suffering from some defective programming.

Speculating on that is way over my pay grade, however. As I said, I'm no biologist.

Defective programming. That's much better than bad wiring. May I have it?

[KC native]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

And again you judge while attacking others when you think they're judging. I love your willingness to be a complete hypocrite, though. You set the bar for everyone else.




And, seriously, your mother should have swallowed.

Your post history clearly indicates that you are a judgmental prick (and not nearly as intelligent as you like to think you are).


judgmental prick is judgmental.

[TLO]

Smells like shit, Donger, and DC in here.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

And, seriously, your mother should have swallowed.

that's abnormal.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Big Smoke

Smells like shit, Donger, and DC in here.

that's what michelle said

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by loochy

that's abnormal.

Like I said, abnormal doesn't mean bad.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by Donger

No, they don't. They are always bisexual, right?

No, it doesn't.

Not necessarily. According to your description of normal, we could be talking about a woman who only dated men for 30 years, but then dated a woman at age 31. According to your definition, she was normal for 30 years, but now is not.

Again, your description of normal doesn't allow for an accurate answer.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by KC native

Your post history clearly indicates that you are a judgmental prick (and not nearly as intelligent as you like to think you are).


judgmental prick is judgmental.

Rinse, repeat


(An I no jest how intellugence I be. I dun bin tested, got lots a learnin', n everthin)

[Bowser]

Originally Posted by Donger

Defective programming. That's much better than bad wiring. May I have it?

You may, but with the condition that you must use it in a live debate with a homosexual one day.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Fish

Not necessarily. According to your description of normal, we could be talking about a woman who only dated men for 30 years, but then dated a woman at age 31. According to your definition, she was normal for 30 years, but now is not.

For the first 30 years, was she also attracted to females and just didn't act on it? If so, she was always abnormal.

Originally Posted by Fish

Again, your description of normal doesn't allow for an accurate answer.

Again, yes it does. You just don't like it. Which I completely understand, mind you.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Bowser

You may, but with the condition that you must use it in a live debate with a homosexual one day.

I've used "bad wiring" in such a discussion already. He got pretty flustered but he eventually conceded that I was correct.