If not #1, where?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by SNR

A QB is the best prospect in the 2013 draft. If the Chiefs decide it isn't Geno, then I'll be disappointed, but not dejected. I'll give the same amount of patience and time to that guy that I would normally give to Geno.

I don't really ****ing care what the combines, pro days, and interviews have to say about the top non QB prospects. They're the wrong pick for the Chiefs at #1, and should be totally ignored unless one of those guys falls deep into the first round and the Chiefs really like the guy.

Let's put it this way: If the best QB grades out at 69 and the best defensive end/tackle/OLB/O lineman grades out at 89, do you think it's in the Chiefs best interest to take that QB?

That's the elephant in the room that no one on Chiefsplanet wants to discuss, at least with ANY civility.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Let's put it this way: If the best QB grades out at 69 and the best defensive end/tackle/OLB/O lineman grades out at 89, do you think it's in the Chiefs best interest to take that QB?

That's the elephant in the room that no one on Chiefsplanet wants to discuss, at least with ANY civility.

Well, if thats the situation, yeah, take the other guy who isn't a QB.


But we've gotta get a QB somewhere. I'd assume do it in the first round, seems thats usually where the best guys are taken. Usually.

Where it gets fuzzy to me is if you're QB is say an 85 and the other guys are 90. Then I'm not sure what you do.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Let's put it this way: If the best QB grades out at 69 and the best defensive end/tackle/OLB/O lineman grades out at 89, do you think it's in the Chiefs best interest to take that QB?

That's not going to happen and you know it.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by SNR

That's not going to happen and you know it.

Actually, I do not know that, especially with any certainty.

Everyone one of these guys has issues, which is why there's no clear cut consensus at this time.

It's also possible that they don't grade out as high as some of you guys expect.

Possible.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Actually, I do not know that, especially with any certainty.

Everyone one of these guys has issues, which is why there's no clear cut consensus at this time.

It's also possible that they don't grade out as high as some of you guys expect.

Possible.

When is the last time there was a draft where the top QB was rated below 80? The Chad Pennington draft? Was he even ranked below 80?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by SNR

When is the last time there was a draft where the top QB was rated below 80? The Chad Pennington draft? Was he even ranked below 80?

I honestly don't know.

But when was the last time there was so much uncertainty surrounding the position before The Combines?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I honestly don't know.

But when was the last time there was so much uncertainty surrounding the position before The Combines?

2011?