Trading the Royals

rageeumr · 03-22-2006, 01:56 PM

This thread or some version of it may have been done before, but I'm curious (and lazy).

Let's say that you have supreme control over KC sports teams. Let's also say that these teams are tradeable just like a player or other commodity.

The hypothetical teams in this scenario share the same positions (28th) in their respective ESPN power rankings. You can trade the Royals for:

1. The Washington Capitals (NHL)
2. The New York Knicks (NBA)

Or, of course, you can keep your beloved Royals.

EDIT: Of course the teams would stay in their respective leagues and play their respective sports. (Thanks for being a smart guy, ENDelt

) I know this throws divisions off and stuff too, just vote in the damn poll!

Ultra Peanut · 03-22-2006, 02:00 PM

The Royals would probably have more success in the Atlantic Division than the Knicks, though.

tk13 · 03-22-2006, 02:01 PM

Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.

jidar · 03-22-2006, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13

Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.

Yeah because smart organizations know that when it comes to making money, it's better to lose money... ?

tk13 · 03-22-2006, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar

Yeah because smart organizations know that when it comes to making money, it's better to lose money... ?

I.. don't... get it....

KHinz57 · 03-22-2006, 02:04 PM

Where are on Chiefs plan-et ... what is this word smart you speak of?

SLAG · 03-22-2006, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

What a bunch of crap. I was all ready to pick the Capitals contingent upon them wearing hockey gear while they played baseball.

The Ice Skates wouldnt Make it to First base

chiefqueen · 03-22-2006, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

What a bunch of crap. I was all ready to pick the Capitals contingent upon them wearing hockey gear while they played baseball.

This would guarantee each first inning supplying more than enough runs to win that day because if the pitcher got close to the plate the gear gets hit (free base) otherwise the balls are way outside. (Pitchers would not throw inside, hockey players know how to fight.)

StcChief · 03-22-2006, 02:28 PM

Cards fan's need a good weekend get away series each year that's close by in a beautiful stadium, more than half empty.

beavis · 03-22-2006, 02:48 PM

Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.

rageeumr · 03-22-2006, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beavis

Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.

Oh ya, well you're ugly

58-4ever · 03-22-2006, 03:05 PM

View Poll Results: So which team is it?
I heart the Royals!! Keep them around! Yay Slugerrrrrrr!	15	88.24%
Bring in the Capitals. Change their name.	0	0%
Bring in the Knicks. Again, name change probably in order.	2	11.76%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

03-22-2006, 01:56 PM	Topic Starter
rageeumr Veteran Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: St. Louis :( Casino cash: $9989900	Trading the Royals This thread or some version of it may have been done before, but I'm curious (and lazy). Let's say that you have supreme control over KC sports teams. Let's also say that these teams are tradeable just like a player or other commodity. The hypothetical teams in this scenario share the same positions (28th) in their respective ESPN power rankings. You can trade the Royals for: 1. The Washington Capitals (NHL) 2. The New York Knicks (NBA) Or, of course, you can keep your beloved Royals. EDIT: Of course the teams would stay in their respective leagues and play their respective sports. (Thanks for being a smart guy, ENDelt) I know this throws divisions off and stuff too, just vote in the damn poll!
Posts: 2,313

03-22-2006, 02:00 PM	#3
Ultra Peanut v^V^v^V^v^V^ Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Holland* Casino cash: $10005177	The Royals would probably have more success in the Atlantic Division than the Knicks, though. __________________
Posts: 39,518

03-22-2006, 02:01 PM	#4
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $2012500	Actually, the Royals are the cheap young up and comers. The Chiefs are old overpaid underachievers. Most smart sports organizations would probably try to trade the Chiefs.
Posts: 54,920

03-22-2006, 02:04 PM	#7
KHinz57 Starter Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Leavenworth, KS Casino cash: $10004900	Where are on Chiefs plan-et ... what is this word smart you speak of?
Posts: 598

03-22-2006, 02:28 PM	#12
StcChief Playing for #1 Draft Pick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Just West of Lambs land Casino cash: $10004900	Cards fan's need a good weekend get away series each year that's close by in a beautiful stadium, more than half empty. __________________ sig test for this screwy schema
Posts: 25,901

03-22-2006, 02:48 PM	#13
beavis Free Born Man of the USA Join Date: May 2003 Casino cash: $9954900	Wow, I've seen some asinine threads around here before, but this is really dumb.
Posts: 7,588

03-22-2006, 03:05 PM	#15
58-4ever The Collective Unconscious Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The OP Casino cash: $9520422
Posts: 10,425