Empty weekend, watch the BRONCOS! - Page 3

BroncoFan · 10-06-2000, 03:00 PM

No Chief game to watch this weekend, so I am inviting all of you to check out the Broncos vs Chargers game on Sunday.

Yes, I really believe that Denver is twice the team that the Chiefs are, and I would like you all to see why. My guess is that most of you have not really watched Bronco football this year (I don't consider the KC game "Bronco Football"), and this is your chance.

Try and give me an objective report, we will see if I am really that far off.

GO BRONCOS
Mile High, try watching the game without your Chief T-Shirt<BR>

milkman · 10-07-2000, 08:11 AM

I won't watch any game wearing my Chiefs T-shirt.
I'll be wearing my Chiefs jersey!

------------------

[b]Red Eyes[/b]
[i]Chinn Up.[/i]

[b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>

Snapper · 10-07-2000, 10:16 AM

$crew the Nags!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'd rather watch the Saints or Bengals than watch your $hitty team!!!!

Tom_Barndts_Twin · 10-07-2000, 10:27 PM

BroncoFan:

Since the Broncos are "twice the team" the Chiefs are as you claim, it can only stand to reason that we should see a scoring fest like none other this weekend when your Donkeys play the Chargers.

Let's see . . . . the Chiefs beat the Chargers 42-10. So that means the Broncos should be due for 84 points this weekend. But, I'll tell ya what . . . since our game was at home and your team is on the road, I'll go ahead and deduct 20 points off the top. That seems fair, doesn't it.

So, in conclusion, if the Broncos are "twice the team the Chiefs are . . . . I expect to see a score somewhere along the lines of 63-7 in the Bronco's favor.

That sounds right, doesn't it?

[This message has been edited by Tom_Barndts_Twin (edited 10-07-2000).]

Bronco Chic · 10-08-2000, 09:49 AM

Bronco Fan -

Don't worry, you know all of them will be there. For being KC fans, all of them sure keep up with the Broncos. I'm sure it's just because they do enjoy good football and they know that their team doesn't produce.

GO BRONCOS!!!!!

milkman · 10-08-2000, 10:29 AM

Just gotta love it! Chiefs don't produce! That's right, Chiefs haven't produced a loss against the Donkeyboys since ole John HorseyFace retired.

------------------

[b]Red Eyes[/b]
[i]Chinn Up.[/i]

[b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>

Tom_Barndts_Twin · 10-08-2000, 11:23 PM

BroncoFan:

Okay. I took you up on your advice. I watched the Broncos game this weekend so I could see why they are "twice the team KC is."

Based on the Chiefs performance against the Chargers 3 weeks ago and Denver's performance against them Sunday, I would beg to differ.

I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Perhaps you could help me out and explain it to me?

[This message has been edited by Tom_Barndts_Twin (edited 10-09-2000).]

KCWolfman · 10-09-2000, 05:26 AM

Vance - Okay, here is my 'objective' report. Your boys played pitifully yesterday. They won off the default of a poor QB and did nothing to impress anyone.

As far as your assinine comment "If you want to use stats, Broncos have not only played better, they have played the better teams." I guess we can both agree that is no longer true. Watching your team struggle against the Chargers was pathetic, sickening, and without any redeeming qualities. And yes this is a Charger team with their [b]THIRD[/b] string qb in the game. KC didnt get that benefit while they racked over 40 points against a [b]BETTER[/b] Chargers team than you played.

Were you born a blind homer or did you have to work at it?

Gaz · 10-09-2000, 06:57 AM

Objective report, sans any smack:

The Broncos are a worse team than I thought they were [see Reply #29].

I expected them to steamroll the Chargers. Despite my arfing for BroncoFan’s sake, I admit that I thought Denver had a good [if not Elway-class] Offense and an aggressive Defense. I also believed that the Broncos coaching staff was far superior.

Instead, they beat a terrible team only because a washed-up backup QB gifted them with stupid INTs.

xoxo~
gaz
somewhat surprised.<BR>

**mlyonsd** · 10-09-2000, 07:15 AM

Trying to be objective:

Broncos +'s:

Where do they find all these RB's, or is the OL really that good? Coleman is another good back.

The DB's played better although SD doesn't have the best WR's.

It looks like they have settled in on Carswell as the TE. While he is no Sharpe, skills or mouth, Greasy is feeling more comfortable throwing to him. TE is a key position in Den offense.

Greasy is going to be a good QB.

SD +'s:

Bronco -'s:

Too many penalties. Thought I was watching KC for a while.

The offense did enough to win but should have been able to move the ball better.

SD -'s:

Too many to list.

**morphius** · 10-09-2000, 07:32 AM

Did Seau even play yesterday? This game sounded painful to watch, glad they decided that it was not even worth showing in KC. Donx just may be horrible.

KCTitus · 10-09-2000, 07:59 AM

[i]I don't consider the KC game "Bronco Football"[/i] - excuses? From Bronco Fan? I thought Bronco Fan's didnt make excuses.

I guess he'll trot out the same line cause, it appeared to me that it was a pretty stinky game. I decided to watch the SF/Raiders game which was a much more exciting game.

bishop_74 · 10-09-2000, 08:11 AM

BroncoFan,
You stupid, ignorant, pathetic fool of a football fan... let me begin by letting you know how foolish you are. Have you ever stopped to consider that the reason the records of teams that you have played are so "high" in the win column is because you LOST to to Rams? Who else have you played, besides us, that is worth a damn. NOBODY! Take your bull**** and feed it to the dogs. YOUR TEAM SUCKS!!! WE ARE BETTER. I don't care about previous records, I don't care about playing with injured players or backups. The Chiefs are just better. If you disagree than you are just ignorant. If you need to talk your trash and call me an idiot to make yourself feel better fine, be a little girl. I had never personally attacked you. Dude, this is all about the game and our teams, I had no beef with you. So f#@* you AND your pathetic loser of a team.

BroncoFan · 10-09-2000, 08:28 AM

Chief Fans,

Once again I am going to do my best to teach all you dumbass Chief fans a lesson. Here is a reaction that you will never see from a Chief fan.

I am soooooooo happy the Broncos won this game, but ****, they played really bad! Yes, there were some bright spots, but there will probably always be some bright spots. No, I will not tell you our team won a divisional game on the road. No I will not say that even though Broncos played like crap, at least they hung in there and found a way to win, that is what good teams do. That is all Chief fan rhetoric. I have decided that maybe I am a Bronco fan, not because I love the Broncos, but because I couldn't stomach being one of you.

So I will say something that you Chiefs fans can't seem to say about the chiefs. Broncos won Sunday because the Chargers played horrendous, and Broncos were just a little bit less horrendous. Sure I am proud of certain parts of our game, our D, our returned punt, our pass rush, our quarterback, and our red zone offense, but I am not proud of the Broncos.

That was a sorry win, and Broncos have alot of work to do.

Compare us to the Chiefs. Not playing like "twice the team the chiefs are", not even close. Although I still feel we can be much better than the Chiefs, we are not playing like it now.

I'll take the win, but only because it gives us a little time to improve. Unlike Chief fans, I am not interested in sneaking into the playoffs only to get killed the first week. I want Broncos to go if they can win, and if they deserve to be there.

KCTitus · 10-09-2000, 08:32 AM

more excuses...tell me BF, when did the Chiefs 'sneak' into the playoffs and lose the first week?

A little Chiefs history, here. In 1995 and 1997 the Chiefs went an NFL best 13-3 to take the #1 seed in the playoffs and homefield advantage. The sad thing was that they wasted said opportunity in both years by pulling boners in the 2nd week of the playoffs. That makes the losses hurt even worse.

BroncoFan · 10-09-2000, 08:38 AM

Bishop,

Stop crying. Your mouth has probably made you look stupid before, you are probably accustomed to that pit in your stomach when you realize someone called your bluff. You said Broncos played terrible teams and that is why we are "statistcally" better. I just pointed out that the teams the Broncos play have a better record than those the Chiefs have played.

Difficult to argue with numbers. Go take a math class.

10-07-2000, 08:11 AM	#31
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	I won't watch any game wearing my Chiefs T-shirt. I'll be wearing my Chiefs jersey! ------------------ [b]Red Eyes[/b] [i]Chinn Up.[/i] [b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>
Posts: 70,769

10-07-2000, 10:16 AM	#32
Snapper Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Oswego,Ks,USofA Casino cash: $10004900	$crew the Nags!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'd rather watch the Saints or Bengals than watch your $hitty team!!!!
Posts: 1,060

10-07-2000, 10:27 PM	#33
Tom_Barndts_Twin Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: KC Casino cash: $10004900	BroncoFan: Since the Broncos are "twice the team" the Chiefs are as you claim, it can only stand to reason that we should see a scoring fest like none other this weekend when your Donkeys play the Chargers. Let's see . . . . the Chiefs beat the Chargers 42-10. So that means the Broncos should be due for 84 points this weekend. But, I'll tell ya what . . . since our game was at home and your team is on the road, I'll go ahead and deduct 20 points off the top. That seems fair, doesn't it. So, in conclusion, if the Broncos are "twice the team the Chiefs are . . . . I expect to see a score somewhere along the lines of 63-7 in the Bronco's favor. That sounds right, doesn't it? [This message has been edited by Tom_Barndts_Twin (edited 10-07-2000).]
Posts: 293

10-08-2000, 09:49 AM	#34
Bronco Chic Starter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA Casino cash: $10004900	Bronco Fan - Don't worry, you know all of them will be there. For being KC fans, all of them sure keep up with the Broncos. I'm sure it's just because they do enjoy good football and they know that their team doesn't produce. GO BRONCOS!!!!!
Posts: 55

10-08-2000, 10:29 AM	#35
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	Just gotta love it! Chiefs don't produce! That's right, Chiefs haven't produced a loss against the Donkeyboys since ole John HorseyFace retired. ------------------ [b]Red Eyes[/b] [i]Chinn Up.[/i] [b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>
Posts: 70,769

10-06-2000, 03:00 PM
BroncoFan Missed Everyone Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	No Chief game to watch this weekend, so I am inviting all of you to check out the Broncos vs Chargers game on Sunday. Yes, I really believe that Denver is twice the team that the Chiefs are, and I would like you all to see why. My guess is that most of you have not really watched Bronco football this year (I don't consider the KC game "Bronco Football"), and this is your chance. Try and give me an objective report, we will see if I am really that far off. GO BRONCOS Mile High, try watching the game without your Chief T-Shirt<BR>
Posts: 2,052

10-08-2000, 11:23 PM	#36
Tom_Barndts_Twin Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: KC Casino cash: $10004900	BroncoFan: Okay. I took you up on your advice. I watched the Broncos game this weekend so I could see why they are "twice the team KC is." Based on the Chiefs performance against the Chargers 3 weeks ago and Denver's performance against them Sunday, I would beg to differ. I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing it. Perhaps you could help me out and explain it to me? [This message has been edited by Tom_Barndts_Twin (edited 10-09-2000).]
Posts: 293

10-09-2000, 05:26 AM	#37
KCWolfman Fall down 7 times, get up 8 Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Vance - Okay, here is my 'objective' report. Your boys played pitifully yesterday. They won off the default of a poor QB and did nothing to impress anyone. As far as your assinine comment "If you want to use stats, Broncos have not only played better, they have played the better teams." I guess we can both agree that is no longer true. Watching your team struggle against the Chargers was pathetic, sickening, and without any redeeming qualities. And yes this is a Charger team with their [b]THIRD[/b] string qb in the game. KC didnt get that benefit while they racked over 40 points against a [b]BETTER[/b] Chargers team than you played. Were you born a blind homer or did you have to work at it?
Posts: 15,469

10-09-2000, 06:57 AM	#38
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	Objective report, sans any smack: The Broncos are a worse team than I thought they were [see Reply #29]. I expected them to steamroll the Chargers. Despite my arfing for BroncoFan’s sake, I admit that I thought Denver had a good [if not Elway-class] Offense and an aggressive Defense. I also believed that the Broncos coaching staff was far superior. Instead, they beat a terrible team only because a washed-up backup QB gifted them with stupid INTs. xoxo~ gaz somewhat surprised.<BR>
Posts: 5,911

10-09-2000, 07:15 AM	#39
mlyonsd Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Spink, SD Casino cash: $1443762	Trying to be objective: Broncos +'s: Where do they find all these RB's, or is the OL really that good? Coleman is another good back. The DB's played better although SD doesn't have the best WR's. It looks like they have settled in on Carswell as the TE. While he is no Sharpe, skills or mouth, Greasy is feeling more comfortable throwing to him. TE is a key position in Den offense. Greasy is going to be a good QB. SD +'s: Bronco -'s: Too many penalties. Thought I was watching KC for a while. The offense did enough to win but should have been able to move the ball better. SD -'s: Too many to list.
Posts: 38,896

10-09-2000, 07:32 AM	#40
morphius World's finest morphius Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $6855027	Did Seau even play yesterday? This game sounded painful to watch, glad they decided that it was not even worth showing in KC. Donx just may be horrible.
Posts: 25,976

10-09-2000, 07:59 AM	#41
KCTitus Archivist Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: The Ethernet Casino cash: $9892732	[i]I don't consider the KC game "Bronco Football"[/i] - excuses? From Bronco Fan? I thought Bronco Fan's didnt make excuses. I guess he'll trot out the same line cause, it appeared to me that it was a pretty stinky game. I decided to watch the SF/Raiders game which was a much more exciting game.
Posts: 26,193

10-09-2000, 08:11 AM	#42
bishop_74 Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Denver, CO. USA Casino cash: $8674993	BroncoFan, You stupid, ignorant, pathetic fool of a football fan... let me begin by letting you know how foolish you are. Have you ever stopped to consider that the reason the records of teams that you have played are so "high" in the win column is because you LOST to to Rams? Who else have you played, besides us, that is worth a damn. NOBODY! Take your bull**** and feed it to the dogs. YOUR TEAM SUCKS!!! WE ARE BETTER. I don't care about previous records, I don't care about playing with injured players or backups. The Chiefs are just better. If you disagree than you are just ignorant. If you need to talk your trash and call me an idiot to make yourself feel better fine, be a little girl. I had never personally attacked you. Dude, this is all about the game and our teams, I had no beef with you. So f#@* you AND your pathetic loser of a team.
Posts: 3,642

10-09-2000, 08:28 AM	#43
BroncoFan Missed Everyone Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Chief Fans, Once again I am going to do my best to teach all you dumbass Chief fans a lesson. Here is a reaction that you will never see from a Chief fan. I am soooooooo happy the Broncos won this game, but ****, they played really bad! Yes, there were some bright spots, but there will probably always be some bright spots. No, I will not tell you our team won a divisional game on the road. No I will not say that even though Broncos played like crap, at least they hung in there and found a way to win, that is what good teams do. That is all Chief fan rhetoric. I have decided that maybe I am a Bronco fan, not because I love the Broncos, but because I couldn't stomach being one of you. So I will say something that you Chiefs fans can't seem to say about the chiefs. Broncos won Sunday because the Chargers played horrendous, and Broncos were just a little bit less horrendous. Sure I am proud of certain parts of our game, our D, our returned punt, our pass rush, our quarterback, and our red zone offense, but I am not proud of the Broncos. That was a sorry win, and Broncos have alot of work to do. Compare us to the Chiefs. Not playing like "twice the team the chiefs are", not even close. Although I still feel we can be much better than the Chiefs, we are not playing like it now. I'll take the win, but only because it gives us a little time to improve. Unlike Chief fans, I am not interested in sneaking into the playoffs only to get killed the first week. I want Broncos to go if they can win, and if they deserve to be there.
Posts: 2,052

10-09-2000, 08:32 AM	#44
KCTitus Archivist Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: The Ethernet Casino cash: $9892732	more excuses...tell me BF, when did the Chiefs 'sneak' into the playoffs and lose the first week? A little Chiefs history, here. In 1995 and 1997 the Chiefs went an NFL best 13-3 to take the #1 seed in the playoffs and homefield advantage. The sad thing was that they wasted said opportunity in both years by pulling boners in the 2nd week of the playoffs. That makes the losses hurt even worse.
Posts: 26,193

10-09-2000, 08:38 AM	#45
BroncoFan Missed Everyone Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Bishop, Stop crying. Your mouth has probably made you look stupid before, you are probably accustomed to that pit in your stomach when you realize someone called your bluff. You said Broncos played terrible teams and that is why we are "statistcally" better. I just pointed out that the teams the Broncos play have a better record than those the Chiefs have played. Difficult to argue with numbers. Go take a math class.
Posts: 2,052