1 gap 3-4; how do you think it will shake out?

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

Actually, he didn't.

Most of his snaps came in sub packages as a pass rusher.

And he was ****ing horrible.

He's a guy who's built like a tank with some straight line speed (4.75ish if I recall). That's it.

He's probably not even an NFL player. Should get into pro wrestling.

He was lined up on the LT even during subs, wendler. he disappointed, yes. But I am not going to say he has peaked or isn't going to stick in the NFL. Hell, I don't even know why we are so stuck on the guy, other than to give him another go or not. This defense is lacking DL. He'll likely get another op, at least a look during TC etc. No idea if he sticks, but his initial step isn't the problem, he simply needs to learn how to play the game/his position at this level as most players do.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

He was lined up on the LT even during subs, wendler. he disappointed, yes. But I am not going to say he has peaked or isn't going to stick in the NFL. Hell, I don't even know why we are so stuck on the guy, other than to give him another go or not. This defense is lacking DL. He'll likely get another op, at least a look during TC etc. No idea if he sticks, but his initial step isn't the problem, he simply needs to learn how to play the game/his position at this level as most players do.

Uhh, no he was not.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Uhh, no he was not.

oooooooooooooh yes he waaaaaaaaaaaaaas.

he played under the LT a lot as I recall.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

oooooooooooooh yes he waaaaaaaaaaaaaas.

he played under the LT a lot as I recall.

Here;s an example of our 2-3-6 against NE. Bailey plays the same position as Tyson in subs and base fronts; Tyson is playing the 3 tech in b/w the RG and RT.



Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

When he called Goatse "Wendler" it ocurred to me that, while the name is new, he's clearly not a noob. So I looked at his post count and realized he'd been here awhile.

Then I hovered over his screen name and realize it was Lou_Zare.

Then I punched myself in the balls for wasting time responding to that assclown. He's Blackbobian in his ability to be wrong. Every. Single. Time.

And he adds his Blackbobian understanding of the game with a Dane-like streak if prickishness anytime anyone dares point out his inanity.

I'm thinking any additional effort put into schooling this ****tard is wasted effort.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

When he called Goatse "Wendler" it ocurred to me that, while the name is new, he's clearly not a noob. So I looked at his post count and realized he'd been here awhile.

Then I hovered over his screen name and realize it was Lou_Zare.

Then I punched myself in the balls for wasting time responding to that assclown. He's Blackbobian in his ability to be wrong. Every. Single. Time.

And he adds his Blackbobian understanding of the game with a Dane-like streak if prickishness anytime anyone dares point out his inanity.

I'm thinking any additional effort put into schooling this ****tard is wasted effort.

**** me. Should have known.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Here;s an example of our 2-3-6 against NE. Bailey plays the same position as Tyson in subs and base fronts; Tyson is playing the 3 tech in b/w the RG and RT.



Explain to me how our DL plays over the LT in subs again?

Under is what I said, as in under front or inside the LT. Just because a DL lines up in a gap does not mean he's stuck there. there are many plays involving stunt/twist movements as you know.

JFC the children are coming out to play today.

We all know Bailey's odds of sticking in the NFL are slim, as is the case with most players drafted mid late rounds etc. I just want to hold up on calling him done.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Uhh, no he was not.

.

How exactly in the **** does that even remotely look like a 4-tech head up on a tackle?



Additionally, this subpckg is a 2-4-5 which is not our most common sub variant.

[Ace Gunner]

Originally Posted by Sorter

.

How exactly in the **** does that even remotely look like a 4-tech head up on a tackle?



Additionally, this subpckg is a 2-4-5 which is not our most common sub variant.

there, that's the look I'm talking about. From there, and depending on what the offense does, he often ends up taking on the LT from that spot. That is all I was saying.