Woodchuck's Mock Draft 1.0 (11-20-12)

[Woodchuck]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

Dude you are the one who has it backwards...

Tannehill at eight is a good example, RG3 going at two and being worth three firsts plus.

Those don't happen if the players also would get 50 million plus...

But I wouldn't expect you too understand this, Scott. You took Tyson Jackson at three AND paid him sixty million.
Posted via Mobile Device

I see your point and you are right about RG3 and Tannehill. They are in the same argument. However, the Tyson Jackson argument is ****ing stupid. Look at the top 10 picks that year. It was a horrible draft class. Guess what? Everyone knows this is also a very weak class.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Woodchuck

I see your point and you are right about RG3 and Tannehill. They are in the same argument. However, the Tyson Jackson argument is ****ing stupid. Look at the top 10 picks that year. It was a horrible draft class. Guess what? Everyone knows this is also a very weak class.

You deserve to be fired today Scott. Already making excuses for your **** up this year?


Get
The
****
Out.

Oh and btw you are still wrong about the wage scale making it ok to draft an ilb at one
Posted via Mobile Device

[OnTheWarpath15]

An inside LB 1st overall?

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

An inside LB 1st overall?

Lol. Remember my post to you the other day?


Case in point.
Posted via Mobile Device