Chiefs More WPI questionable behavior

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:35 AM

I find it hilarious that Claythan tonight decides to write a story about Pioli possibly getting NE closure before accepting the Chiefs job..

(and no, I didn't read it, but saw the first paragraph)

Didn't a poster on Arrowhead Pride post this information? Did you cite him?

Do you enjoy basically stealing other people's ideas for stories?

You also might try citing the direct source instead of saying "A recent report.." instead of attributing the information to Adam Schefter about the GM candiates.

I'm sure you'll pull the "Nick is talking to his sources" bullshit about this one, but if anyone ever did this to WPI, you'd be calling all your fake lawyers at scout.com.

What ****ing trash.

Hammock Parties · 01-11-2009, 01:36 AM

Thank you for reading!

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

Thank you for reading!

I didn't read anything but the first paragraph.

Does it feel good to be a thief?

Hammock Parties · 01-11-2009, 01:37 AM

Grammatically, your thread title would read better as:

"More questionable WPI behavior."

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

Grammatically, your thread title would read better as:

"More questionable WPI behavior."

Realistically, you might get laid if:

A) you didn't live at home as you approach 30 years old
B) you had a real job

****ing thief.

aturnis · 01-11-2009, 01:41 AM

Thief!

Hammock Parties · 01-11-2009, 01:41 AM

I also think "questionable" is not a strong enough adjective.

Your thread title may have been more attractive if you had chosen one of the following substitutes:

shady
dubious
disreputable
skullduggerrific

**J Diddy** · 01-11-2009, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

I didn't read anything but the first paragraph.

Does it feel good to be a thief?

funny thing is "aren't women attracted to bad boys"

hmm, claythan fails at life

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

I also think "questionable" is not a strong enough adjective.

Your thread title may have been more attractive if you had chosen one of the following substitutes:

shady
dubious
disreputable
skullduggerrific

You're right - I'd like the mods to change it to:

Claythan is a stealing scumbag loser.

I'm surprised Nick's dead-on sources couldn't have provided you with enough info for a story to run tonight.

Hammock Parties · 01-11-2009, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

You're right - I'd like the mods to change it to:

Claythan is a stealing scumbag loser.

I still don't think this title is completely grammatically correct. The way it reads right now, you'd think I was losing scumbags, as if I had trouble keeping track of them, or they were constantly falling out of my scumbag tote.

I think it would best read as:

Claythan is a scumbag and a stealing loser.

Overall, "stealing loser" is still pretty awkward.

You could go with "Claythan is a scumbag and a loser thief."

Although, if your hypothesis is that I'm a thief, and apparently a successful one since the police aren't knocking on my door, "loser thief" really isn't accurately descriptive. Perhaps "master thief" would work best?

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

I still don't think this title is completely grammatically correct. The way it reads right now, you'd think I was losing scumbags, as if I had trouble keeping track of them, or they were constantly falling out of my scumbag tote.

I think it would best read as:

Claythan is a scumbag and a stealing loser.

Overall, "stealing loser" is still pretty awkward.

You could go with "Claythan is a scumbag and a loser thief."

Although, if your hypothesis is that I'm a thief, and apparently a successful one since the police aren't knocking on my door, "loser thief" really isn't accurately descriptive. Perhaps "master thief" would work best?

Maybe I'll go over to another message board and steal their ideas to come up with one.

The police don't knock on your mother's door for stealing intellectual property.

Virgin thief works the best.

Hammock Parties · 01-11-2009, 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Virgin thief works the best.

Aha! One might think so, but I certainly do not steal virgins and am not remotely qualified in such matters.

bowener · 01-11-2009, 01:53 AM

Ive been posting over there for less than 2 days and

Its ****ing crazy. Like clones of clones of clones. Each copy is slightly less sharp than the previous, until the newest one has devolved into some kind of chimera like creature, half-claythan, half-biscuit.

Also, they really do worship Nick Athan, and maybe even Claythan... who is CI though? Chiefs Insider? Becuase they really suck his cock.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan

Aha! One might think so, but I certainly do not steal virgins and am not remotely qualified in such matters.

You should send Lanier63 over at Arrowhead Pride a thank you note for all the hard work he did on your story.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-11-2009, 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

Ive been posting over there for less than 2 days and

Its ****ing crazy. Like clones of clones of clones. Each copy is slightly less sharp than the previous, until the newest one has devolved into some kind of chimera like creature, half-claythan, half-biscuit.

Also, they really do worship Nick "The Erroneous One" Athan, and maybe even Claythan... who is CI though? Chiefs Insider? Becuase they really suck his cock.

Yeah, it's like a cult of reeruns over there. The information they get over there is recycled, but yet they PAY for it.

Personally, I wish they'd all just off themselves in a mass suicide.

01-11-2009, 01:35 AM
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	More WPI questionable behavior I find it hilarious that Claythan tonight decides to write a story about Pioli possibly getting NE closure before accepting the Chiefs job.. (and no, I didn't read it, but saw the first paragraph) Didn't a poster on Arrowhead Pride post this information? Did you cite him? Do you enjoy basically stealing other people's ideas for stories? You also might try citing the direct source instead of saying "A recent report.." instead of attributing the information to Adam Schefter about the GM candiates. I'm sure you'll pull the "Nick is talking to his sources" bullshit about this one, but if anyone ever did this to WPI, you'd be calling all your fake lawyers at scout.com. What ****ing trash.
Posts: 23,212

01-11-2009, 01:36 AM	#2
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4730478	Thank you for reading! __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,765

01-11-2009, 01:37 AM	#4
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4730478	Grammatically, your thread title would read better as: "More questionable WPI behavior." __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,765

01-11-2009, 01:41 AM	#6
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	Thief!
Posts: 13,873

01-11-2009, 01:41 AM	#7
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4730478	I also think "questionable" is not a strong enough adjective. Your thread title may have been more attractive if you had chosen one of the following substitutes: shady dubious disreputable skullduggerrific __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,765

01-11-2009, 01:53 AM	#13
bowener BAMF! Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $9549897	Ive been posting over there for less than 2 days and Its ***ing crazy. Like clones of clones of clones. Each copy is slightly less sharp than the previous, until the newest one has devolved into some kind of chimera like creature, half-claythan, half-biscuit. Also, they really do worship Nick Athan, and maybe even Claythan... who is CI though? Chiefs Insider? Becuase they really suck his cock. __________________ Main Entry: bowe·ner Pronunciation: \ˈbō-nər\ Function: noun* Date: circa 2007
Posts: 8,358