|
|
03-17-2012, 08:32 PM | #1 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Casino cash: $9031048
|
Prefer to trade down
|
Posts: 2,465
|
03-17-2012, 09:49 PM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2011
Casino cash: $4596550
|
|
Posts: 12,586
|
03-17-2012, 09:51 PM | #3 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
Who's behind us that may want to trade up for the best OT available? Would the Rams be willing to give up a future number 1 for a chance to draft Reiff?
__________________
|
|
Posts: 70,769
|
03-17-2012, 09:57 PM | #4 | |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2011
Casino cash: $4596550
|
Quote:
The best OT available is not going to be worth the #11 pick. People need to realize that OTHER teams are aware of the draft class' weakness as well. Suck it up and draft Poe or Decastro. I think Kuechly is great, but is redundant in this system with the presence of DJ. |
|
Posts: 12,586
|
03-17-2012, 10:00 PM | #5 | |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
Casino cash: $1695053
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,116
|
03-17-2012, 10:06 PM | #6 | |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2011
Casino cash: $4596550
|
Quote:
If someone wants to trade up, and we feel like we can still get our guy (like Baldwin last year), then fantastic. I'm 100% for trading down. I'm just doubtful anyone is a willing trade partner. At that point, you HAVE to draft whoever you like the best, regardless of position. Decastro is a fantastic pick at that point, because you are getting a legitimate first round talent, a day one starter, and at a position of need. Add to that the average length of an offensive lineman's career vs that of a running back, and I'd easily put him in contention with Trent Richardson. I know Richardson is more talented, but the averages suggest he is going to contribute as a starter for half the time Decastro will. Just my take. |
|
Posts: 12,586
|
03-18-2012, 12:32 AM | #7 |
**** SOC & **** YOU
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chiefs Hell
Casino cash: $10018214
|
|
Posts: 19,884
|
|
|