Royals Who is/was worse? Herm or Hillman?

Hammock Parties · 07-19-2009, 02:45 PM

I'm just not noticing all the hatred for Hillman. Here I had thought he was a young, promising managerial candidate who was just going through a rough transitional stage.

Now I see someone calling him a dumbass.

Is he is as bad as Herm was for the Chiefs? Worse?

**petegz28** · 07-19-2009, 02:46 PM

Herm Hillman=Trey Edwards

**DeezNutz** · 07-19-2009, 02:51 PM

Good men, IMO.

Terrible coaches. Terrible.

CoMoChief · 07-19-2009, 02:52 PM

Hillman has less to work with.

Herm probably has the higher stress job, obviously more fast pace.

But Herm is the bigger idiot.

**Reaper16** · 07-19-2009, 02:53 PM

Herm is worse, I think. A Hillman-led team of better players would win despite Hillman's presence.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 07-19-2009, 02:54 PM

Herm is worse by a country mile. He took this team into the dark ages. Trey at least improved upon what he had. The Royals have been tragic for decades. The Chiefs? Not entirely until Herm dealt the death blow.

**Gonzo** · 07-19-2009, 02:56 PM

I would think Herm. We expect douchebaggery from the Royals, not the Chiefs.
Posted via Mobile Device

**DeezNutz** · 07-19-2009, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Herm is worse by a country mile. He took this team into the dark ages. Trey at least improved upon what he had. The Royals have been tragic for decades. The Chiefs? Not entirely until Herm dealt the death blow.

You need to watch more Royals games, my friend.

Stupid poll question on a Chiefs board, since only a small percentage of the posters are stupid enough to follow the Royals very closely, myself being one of the ****ing idiots.

**petegz28** · 07-19-2009, 03:00 PM

Herm at least had a philosophy...a bad one but he had one.

Hillman is ****ing clueless

milkman · 07-19-2009, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

You need to watch more Royals games, my friend.

Stupid poll question on a Chiefs board, since only a small percentage of the posters are stupid enough to follow the Royals very closely, myself being one of the ****ing idiots.

I don't get to watch many games, and in football with only 16 games every bad decision is magnified, but reading through these game threads and watching when I can, I get the feeling that Hillman is every bit as bad at his job as Herman ****ing Edwards was at his.

Trey Dilweed?

**Reaper16** · 07-19-2009, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Herm is worse by a country mile. He took this team into the dark ages. Trey at least improved upon what he had. The Royals have been tragic for decades. The Chiefs? Not entirely until Herm dealt the death blow.

Herm's desire to get a youth movement going was the right one. Vermiel left the franchise an aged husk of a team. Its just that Herm was a damaging coach. He had the right idea, but he was incapable of effectively executing it.

Trey, meanwhile, pfffffffffft.

**DeezNutz** · 07-19-2009, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I don't get to watch many games, and in football with only 16 games every bad decision is magnified, but reading through these game threads and watching when I can, I get the feeling that Hillman is every bit as bad at his job as Herman ****ing Edwards was at his.

Trey Dilweed?

No question. No. Question.

I can understand argues for Herm ****ing Edwards being the worst b/c a HC is more important in the NFL than a manager is in MLB. Still, Trey Edwards is really, really bad.

JuicesFlowing · 07-19-2009, 03:09 PM

Hillman took a bad team and ... kept them bad. Herm took a team that won 10 games and destroyed them in every possible way.

*edit: I know the Chiefs were an old team, but 10 wins is 10 wins.

**wazu** · 07-19-2009, 03:19 PM

Hillman is so completely clueless that Herm can rightfully look down on him as an intellectual inferior.

Farzin · 07-19-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Herm at least had a philosophy...a bad one but he had one.

Hillman is ****ing clueless

This

View Poll Results: Who is/was worse? Herm or Hillman?
Herm was worse	41	48.24%
Hillman is worse	16	18.82%
About the same...one good dumbass deserves another...	28	32.94%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

07-19-2009, 02:45 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4730478	Who is/was worse? Herm or Hillman? I'm just not noticing all the hatred for Hillman. Here I had thought he was a young, promising managerial candidate who was just going through a rough transitional stage. Now I see someone calling him a dumbass. Is he is as bad as Herm was for the Chiefs? Worse?
Posts: 277,763

07-19-2009, 02:46 PM	#2
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $2814127	Herm Hillman=Trey Edwards
Posts: 127,996

07-19-2009, 02:52 PM	#4
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $8052254	Hillman has less to work with. Herm probably has the higher stress job, obviously more fast pace. But Herm is the bigger idiot.
Posts: 39,156

07-19-2009, 02:56 PM	#7
Gonzo Stuff & Things Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Yukon Casino cash: $10126924	I would think Herm. We expect douchebaggery from the Royals, not the Chiefs. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 21,498

07-19-2009, 03:00 PM	#9
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $2814127	Herm at least had a philosophy...a bad one but he had one. Hillman is ****ing clueless
Posts: 127,996

07-19-2009, 03:09 PM	#13
JuicesFlowing Losing with passion. Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Oblivion Casino cash: $10004925	Hillman took a bad team and ... kept them bad. Herm took a team that won 10 games and destroyed them in every possible way. *edit: I know the Chiefs were an old team, but 10 wins is 10 wins.
Posts: 4,399

07-19-2009, 03:19 PM	#14
wazu ... Join Date: May 2002 Location: Kansas City, MO Casino cash: $2222295 VARSITY	Hillman is so completely clueless that Herm can rightfully look down on him as an intellectual inferior.
Posts: 27,732