Babb: How will Charles get his carries with another running back in the Chiefs’ mix?

[Tribal Warfare]

How will Charles get his carries with another running back in the Chiefs’ mix?
By KENT BABB
The Kansas City Star

T he old man took a shove and then came back ready to swing. Thomas Jones still has some fire left.

Jones, the veteran Chiefs running back who on Friday will turn 33 years old, was pushed out of bounds in the first quarter of last week’s preseason opener against Tampa Bay. It was mostly an unmemorable evening — it ended with a 25-0 Chiefs loss — if not, in part, for Jones’ crashing into a table after a 17-yard carry and then running toward the Bucs defender who shoved him.

“Once you stop loving the game and playing with intensity,” Jones said afterward, “it’s time for you to stop playing. I don’t feel that way.”

In an abbreviated appearance, Jones rushed for 25 yards on two carries, perhaps a glimpse that age has not yet caught up with him and that, in a crowded Chiefs backfield, the team’s third-eldest player can still account for some memorable moments.

The Chiefs face an interesting problem entering the 2011 season: A year after leading the NFL in rushing, averaging 164.2 yards, they have more talent in their backfield — perhaps so much that a reliable running back or two might be denied carries. The Chiefs signed fullback Le’Ron McClain, and second-year player Dexter McCluster has taken plenty of snaps at running back during training camp.

Already, some Chiefs fans are in a fury that, for the second consecutive season, it was Jones and not Jamaal Charles — whose 1,467 yards last season was second only to Houston’s Arian Foster, who had 1,616 — who was listed as the team’s No. 1 running back when the first depth chart was released last week.

Charles was in uniform but didn’t have a carry in Friday’s game, and he declined a postgame interview, saying he preferred to let the team’s younger players speak.

Regardless, Charles has said he doesn’t pay much attention to the depth chart, and despite the fan concern, sharing carries last year with Jones seemed to make Charles a more explosive back.

Finishing with 15 carries fewer than Jones’ 245 in 2010, Charles improved on his rushing average and yardage, and reduced the number of fumbles from his breakout season in 2009, when he averaged 20 carries per game — about six more than his workload last year. Charles also ended the season healthier; he underwent offseason shoulder surgery before the 2010 season.

So a healthy Charles is a productive Charles, and odd as it might seem for some fans, giving the team’s best rusher an occasional break was a good thing last year. Now, it’s a question of how to find the right balance among Charles and the team’s other backs.

McClain was Baltimore’s primary rusher in 2008, reaching the first of two consecutive Pro Bowls. His role was de-emphasized after the Ravens drafted Ray Rice to pair with Willis McGahee, and McClain said during free agency that he wanted to sign with a team where he’d have a chance to be one of its main ball carriers.

On Friday, McClain backed off that mandate, saying he would happily block for Charles and Jones — and whoever else carries the ball.

“You’ve got so much to choose from, with Thomas Jones and Jamaal Charles and Dex back there,” McClain said.

He added that he signed with the Chiefs with the hope of being “utilized” more than he was in Baltimore, where he totaled 74 carries in the past two seasons. He said that if he excels in his role as a blocker, perhaps a few carries will trickle in his direction.

“Priority No. 1: Block for those two guys and get our running game back to where it needs to be, and that’s No. 1,” he said. “I think that’s why they brought me in here, and that’s my job, so I’m going to be laying linebackers out weekly, man, and doing whatever I can.”

In the back of the locker room, near the exit, Jackie Battle dressed quietly as other backs held small, informal news conferences. Battle was the Chiefs’ leading rusher against Tampa Bay, finishing with 40 yards on 13 carries, but he also had a fumble that weighed on his mind hours after it occurred.

“I can’t make mistakes,” he said. “And I made one.”

Battle, the Chiefs’ best short-yardage back last year, is easy to overlook in the team’s running backs derby, and he said Friday that the pressure is higher and the margin of error smaller with so many talented backs surrounding him.

“I’m just trying to find my role,” he said. “The offense, it’s different now. We’ve got a bunch of guys in here; a lot of talent. I’m just trying to find my place in there.”

Battle said he’d like a larger slice of the carries pie — he had 20 last year — but he understands there are plenty of hungry teammates to satisfy. He said he’d do whatever the Chiefs ask of him, as long as he has a place on the team.

“I’ll put my hand down and play fullback if they want me to,” he said.

The problem with that is the Chiefs signed McClain and drafted Shane Bannon in the seventh round. Still, Battle said he’s hopeful he’ll have a roster spot after final cuts are made in about three weeks.

McClain thinks coach Todd Haley and coordinator Bill Muir have a plan for how to split the carries and to make certain the Chiefs remain one of the league’s top rushing teams. But McClain also said that some might be left out, others could emerge and depth-chart questions — like the aging but fiery Jones starting over the spectacular Charles — will likely persist.

He said none of that will matter if the Chiefs replicate their 2010 performance.

“The sky’s the limit,” McClain said. “They put that up last year, being the No. 1 running team in the league. Now this year, with me added to it, we’re trying to get it again. And again and again, as long as I’m here.”

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by Laz

nothing is going to change, Charles' carries will be limited by the need to keep him healthy not another running back.

This ^

[Rausch]

I'd like to see us use McCluster like the Pats used Kevin Faulk...

[DBOSHO]

Imagine the Jumbo T with our personnel.

..............Cassel......

Charles. McClain. McCluster

MOTHER OF GOD.

[CrazyPhuD]

This is nothing but good. The more carries we have, the fewer times cassel is throwing the ball! Granted you generally can't run your way to a championship so we're likely screwed there, but I'll take it until stanzi or someone else is ready.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Rausch

I'd like to see us use McCluster like the Pats used Kevin Faulk...

If the Pats had had Jamaal Charles they would have used Jamaal Charles instead of Kevin Faulk.

[Chiefs=Champions]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

If the Pats had had Jamaal Charles they would have used Jamaal Charles instead of Kevin Faulk.

This. Charles was amazing as a 3rd down back last year, no need to change it.

[chiefzilla1501]

I don't care what anybody says. Giving Charles less carries is fine with me. I hate that people were pushing for him to get 20-25 carries a game last season. He broke down toward the end of the year. Mount Cody almost took him out of Baltimore. And I think there were 2-3 games toward the end of the season where he had to sit out a quarter and/or walked off the field in a limp.

I would have no problem with the Chiefs again keeping him to about 15 carries per game. 20+ only in games where they need him to really step it up.

[Bump]

shit with a legit lead blocker in front of him, Charles will get 2,000 yds on like 250 carries man

[Thig Lyfe]

McClain probably realized that the Chiefs can't do shit on short yardage situations, so he'll get plenty of 3rd & short and goal line carries. He could be a steal in fantasy if he ends up poaching Jamaal's red zone chances.