|
|
View Poll Results: Should steroids be a consideration for HOF voting? | |||
No, steroids are not an issue | 12 | 22.64% | |
Yes, but not an eliminating factor | 17 | 32.08% | |
Yes, steroids undermined the game | 24 | 45.28% | |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-19-2012, 02:42 PM | Topic Starter |
The Master
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Marion, IA
Casino cash: $10004925
|
Should steroid use determine who is in the HOF?
With the recent Roger Clemens decision, whether players that have been involved with steroids should be part of the baseball HOF has come back into the discussion. Thus far the writers have sent a resounding no to that answer.
Keep in mind that part of the criteria for the baseball hall deals with off the field issues as well. Players like Orlando Cepeda were kept out of the hall for years because of their connections to drugs while borderline players like Keith Hernandez did not even come close to election. The All-time hits king is not even eligible because of betting on baseball. BTW, there is no Gaz option. If you don't like baseball or don't care about this issue, why are you even reading this? |
Posts: 23,101
|
|
|