Importance to the offense who would you have picked?

Logical · 03-21-2006, 05:08 PM

TRich

A declining W. Shields

Both epitomize the Chiefs it would have been best if they both could have retired a Chief. But given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?

Sully · 03-21-2006, 05:09 PM

T-Rich, actually.
We have a guard to fill in (just not a tackle)
T-Rich was a road grader on the GL. Hopefully Cruz can be as well. He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping.

JBucc · 03-21-2006, 05:11 PM

We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.

Logical · 03-21-2006, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBucc

We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.

Kind of my thought as well.

el borracho · 03-21-2006, 06:02 PM

You forgot the "neither" option (not that I would have picked it).

I chose Shields over Richardson. Seriously, we can get another fullback.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad · 03-21-2006, 06:11 PM

i wasn't expecting Shields to play this season so I have already convinced myself that Welbourne would be a nice replacement. Although a nice surprise having Shields back, I'd rather have T-rich.

StcChief · 03-21-2006, 06:18 PM

If you can't have both.
Shields.

Hopefully Cruz, Wilson, Dunn can step in and be the front man to LJ

CHENZ A! · 03-21-2006, 06:19 PM

As much as I hate to see either of them go, Shields still dominates his position.

FloridaMan88 · 03-21-2006, 07:16 PM

Will Shields without a doubt. T-Rich was a great player, but his role in the offense was decreasing.

patteeu · 03-21-2006, 08:02 PM

TRich is declining too. Will Shields is and always has been more valuable.

Eleazar · 03-21-2006, 08:08 PM

Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?

unlurking · 03-21-2006, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise

Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?

Agreed.

Shootr · 03-21-2006, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully

He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping.

I saw him at the gym, too. Did he look kinda small to you?

seclark · 03-21-2006, 08:48 PM

i voted t-rich...but i'm football ignernt.
sec

KC_John · 03-21-2006, 09:00 PM

Keep Shields without question..thoo Carl is a fooking idiot to let Trich go. WTf else is he spending the money on...there had better be a good surprise in the Chiefs FA signing future to justify this move.

View Poll Results: Given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?
T Rich	10	27.03%
W Shields	25	67.57%
I am just observing	2	5.41%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

03-21-2006, 05:08 PM
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Importance to the offense who would you have picked? TRich A declining W. Shields Both epitomize the Chiefs it would have been best if they both could have retired a Chief. But given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?
Posts: 31,579

03-21-2006, 05:09 PM	#2
Sully It Goes On Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lees Summit Casino cash: $10026331	T-Rich, actually. We have a guard to fill in (just not a tackle) T-Rich was a road grader on the GL. Hopefully Cruz can be as well. He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping. __________________ "And I don't wish that girl any bad luck," he said, "but I hope she gets hit with a car." - Tommy Lasorda
Posts: 18,295

03-21-2006, 05:11 PM	#3
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.
Posts: 12,016

03-21-2006, 06:02 PM	#5
el borracho In Pat We Trust Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $6379148	You forgot the "neither" option (not that I would have picked it). I chose Shields over Richardson. Seriously, we can get another fullback.
Posts: 11,826

03-21-2006, 06:11 PM	#6
Rudy tossed tigger's salad Better than Nelson Join Date: Mar 2003 Casino cash: $10000400	i wasn't expecting Shields to play this season so I have already convinced myself that Welbourne would be a nice replacement. Although a nice surprise having Shields back, I'd rather have T-rich.
Posts: 17,356

03-21-2006, 06:18 PM	#7
StcChief Playing for #1 Draft Pick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Just West of Lambs land Casino cash: $10004900	If you can't have both. Shields. Hopefully Cruz, Wilson, Dunn can step in and be the front man to LJ __________________ sig test for this screwy schema
Posts: 25,901

03-21-2006, 06:19 PM	#8
CHENZ A! pimping hoes + clocking a grip Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $9977569	As much as I hate to see either of them go, Shields still dominates his position.
Posts: 6,302

03-21-2006, 07:16 PM	#9
FloridaMan88 Mahomes: We Are All Witnesses Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $3162906	Will Shields without a doubt. T-Rich was a great player, but his role in the offense was decreasing.
Posts: 38,241

03-21-2006, 08:02 PM	#10
patteeu The 23rd Pillar Join Date: Sep 2002 Casino cash: $10019237	TRich is declining too. Will Shields is and always has been more valuable. __________________ “Boy, you all want power. God, I hope you never get it.” - Lindsay Graham
Posts: 110,871

03-21-2006, 08:08 PM	#11
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?
Posts: 80,659

03-21-2006, 08:48 PM	#14
seclark MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: nemo Casino cash: $1689900	i voted t-rich...but i'm football ignernt. sec
Posts: 13,400

03-21-2006, 09:00 PM	#15
KC_John Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Hoosier Daddy? Casino cash: $10004900	Keep Shields without question..thoo Carl is a fooking idiot to let Trich go. WTf else is he spending the money on...there had better be a good surprise in the Chiefs FA signing future to justify this move.
Posts: 294