|
|
01-31-2013, 01:47 PM | #1 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
Once again, it would be a Public Relations DISASTER for the Kansas City Chiefs to select a QB #1, only to bench him for two years while he "develops". He'd be labeled a bust by absolutely everyone in the media, national or local. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
01-31-2013, 01:51 PM | #2 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $1744088
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 47,146
|
01-31-2013, 01:53 PM | #3 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
I don't think so.
Keitzman and all the other local guys would be hammering Reid and Dorsey for taking a QB #1 that can't break the starting lineup. And if the other first round QB's have any success at all (which given the climate in recent years, is certainly a possibility), he'll be looked upon as a bust. If the Chiefs select a QB #1, he must be able to start Day One, barring injury. |
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|