Chiefs People blaming Cassel for this loss are clearly maladjusted freaks. - Page 3

yhf · 10-17-2010, 10:06 PM

For Christs sake, blame the coaches, blame the refs, blame the defense.

Do NOT blame Matt Cassel. He provided a winning effort.

C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT RATING
M. Cassel 20/29 201 6.9 3 0 122.9

Anyone that asks for more production, is, a dumb****.

Don't get me wrong, I doubt the shit out of Cassel, but his performance in this game was extremely encouraging. Any purported Chiefs fan that wasn't impressed and pleased by his play should just... get a ****ing grip.

Hammock Parties · 10-17-2010, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

Today you said we were going to abuse their tackles...and Vrabel and Hali would have beast like games.

I laughed at you.

Do you not remember?

I said nothing of Vrabel dominating. I said I thought Hali would have a good game.

He got a few pressures but that was it.

I was wrong.

For you to blow it out of proportion was shitty.

**DeezNutz** · 10-17-2010, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yhf

I am no Cassel apologist but if he can play as well as he played today throughout the remainder of the season look out mother****ers!

Is Cassel good enough to help this team win playoff games? Yes, "games," plural.

Because what I'm "looking out" for is a quick exit b/c championship QBs have to help teams overcome shortcomings in other areas. While I agree that Cassel is not primarily or solely responsible for today's loss, he is still culpable, though I'm sure he would tell you otherwise.

**dirk digler** · 10-17-2010, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnny961

Cassel's rating and numbers look good. That being said, look at the overall offense. Run plays versus pass plays. Run plays outnumbered pass plays by a considerable margin. Showing we chose to run the ball as our primary attack method even though we were up against one of the poorer pass defenses in the league. Says alot about the coaches confidence in our pass game. And, further, Cassel didn't exactly light up their secondary either. Bunch of dink and dunk (low risk passes) crap that looked good on the rating, thats all. I'd agree that Cassel didn't lose this game but to say that his game was much more than so-so is a stretch when you look at the offensive gameplan as a whole. He had a few nice throws but hell thats what he's getting paid to do.

Totally agree and noticed it very early on. The Texans have the 32nd ranked Pass D yet we were basically running the RRP offense.

FAX · 10-17-2010, 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yhf

Sorry DaFace. Shouldna did it.

Never apologize, Mr. vhf. Even to one of our magnificent Mods. It's a sign of weakness. However, I'm also sorry to say that converting to Cassolothism is a sign of early stage wackiness.

We cannot pin our hopes and dreams on Mick Casswipe. He will lead us into oblivion and cause an untold number of seizures and drinking disorders. As sad as it may seem, it is best for all that he swallow a live grenade.

FAX

**DeezNutz** · 10-17-2010, 10:33 PM

If vhs will review the tape, and I'm sure he will, I'm confident that he'll come to a different conclusion.

Silock · 10-17-2010, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

we lost, fair and square...to a team we should have beat.

Happens

EVERY

WEEK

Fair and square notwithstanding (re: Bad PI call), I don't know that I agree with "to a team we should have beat."

They are the better team. Make no mistake about that. If we had won, they would be saying that THEY lost to a team they should have beaten.

However, we were in a position to win and we SHOULD have been able to put the game away. But the final outcome isn't really surprising.

Hootie · 10-17-2010, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

I said nothing of Vrabel dominating. I said I thought Hali would have a good game.

He got a few pressures but that was it.

I was wrong.

For you to blow it out of proportion was shitty.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....9&postcount=77

You're right...he would perhaps dominate.

Meh.

Oh well.

Will stop patting myself on the back now for being right two weeks in a row...cost me a spot at my favorite bar (most likely) and more misery than any human should have because a football team lost.

jak112460 · 10-17-2010, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Quarterbacks who threw for more yards than Cassel today:

Josh Freeman
Drew ****ing Stanton (thought he died or was exiled to Siberia)
Chad Henne
Colt McCoy (lolololol)

PS - Cassel should suck Bowe's chocolate salty balls for getting 1/5th of his passing production on one completion.

Do you want to trade QB's with AZ? NO. Then shut up about Cassel. He's not a pro bowl QB yet but he is servicable. I was around for Steve Bono and worse and Cassel is no Bono. How about Elvis Grbac? Todd Blackledge? Most you you don't even know who they are. LOL. The Chiefs have won for years on the backs of decent, but not stellar QB's. Look at the Chargers. On paper they should be kicking the crap out of the AFC and they suck. Not to mention they have the worst coach in the history of the NFL. The Chiefs are a good team that are on the verge of being great. They are going to lose games like they did today throughout the year. Next year they will truly be a seasoned TEAM. I bet anything that they will be picked to make the playoffs be every analyst next year. Nobody picked them to be undefeated after three games. Stop blaming Cassel for the losses solely. Some of you guys are complete babies. The Chiefs are exciting again and are IN every single game they play. Not one game were they blown out. The Chiefs scored thirty one points today. That IS enough to win any game. ANY GAME!!! The so called class of the AFC west got beat by the lowly Rams today. The Chiefs could beat the Rams any day and they beat the Chargers. This team is miles better than last year. If they go 8-8 this year then they are going 11-5 next year and are solidly in the playoffs. We can only hope that the Chargers keep that horrible coach they have. The Chiefs are good and are exciting to watch.

Hootie · 10-17-2010, 10:35 PM

They are most certainly NOT THE BETTER TEAM.

Not one bit.

We were the superior team...not even close today. We are more talented...and...BETTER.

and you're right...it was a bullshit mother ****ing PI call...but it should have been a no call...and a no call still resulted in a big gain...no?

**cdcox** · 10-17-2010, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

We were supposed to have a VAUNTED defense...

This is the first multi dimensional offense we have played all year. Our defense has been succeeding by taking away the other offenses best weapon. Between Andre Johnson, Matt Schaub, and Adrian Foster, we couldn't shut then down. We still have several weaknesses on D. We aren't the Pittsburgh Steelers. Speaking of which, would we be able to score 10 points on them?

We've made some good strides from last year, but our defense is not "vaunted" let alone "VAUNTED" and our offense is one dimensional. We have a long way to go.

Silock · 10-17-2010, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

They are most certainly NOT THE BETTER TEAM.

Not one bit.

We were the superior team...not even close today. We are more talented...and...BETTER.

and you're right...it was a bullshit mother ****ing PI call...but it should have been a no call...and a no call still resulted in a big gain...no?

Based upon what evidence? They have a true offense with a legit WR and QB. We don't have that. We perhaps have some advantages on defense, but we certainly didn't play like we did today.

And no, it should have been offensive PI due to the clear shove in the back to gain separation (to which he admitted in his post-game quotes).

**DeezNutz** · 10-17-2010, 10:38 PM

I hope milkman meets our new historian soon, as the former could use some brushing up on his Chiefs history, since he's a bandwagon coattail rider of impressive distinction.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-17-2010, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

The interesting thing though is has lead comebacks when he was with the Pats.

He's in his second year in KC. **** the Patriots.

He's 7-14 in KC.

He had a chance to prove he was worthy of his salary today and he ****ing screwed the pooch.

No more excuses.

Silock · 10-17-2010, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

He's in his second year in KC. **** the Patriots.

He's 7-14 in KC.

He had a chance to prove he was worthy of his salary today and he ****ing screwed the pooch.

No more excuses.

That pooch has got to have the sorest asshole in the world by now.

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-17-2010, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

Both sides of the ball and STs really had a chance to put this game away before the last 30 seconds. I'm not going to call anyone out but I think I agree with you on this one.

PhilFree

Yep.

If McCluster or Arenas had run it back for a touchdown, GAME OVER!

****ing second rounders.

10-17-2010, 10:06 PM
yhf Starter Join Date: May 2010 Location: OPKS Casino cash: $10004925	People blaming Cassel for this loss are clearly maladjusted freaks. For Christs sake, blame the coaches, blame the refs, blame the defense. Do NOT blame Matt Cassel. He provided a winning effort. C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT RATING M. Cassel 20/29 201 6.9 3 0 122.9 Anyone that asks for more production, is, a dumb**. Don't get me wrong, I doubt the shit out of Cassel, but his performance in this game was extremely encouraging. Any purported Chiefs fan that wasn't impressed and pleased by his play should just... get a **ing grip.
Posts: 430

10-17-2010, 10:35 PM	#39
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	They are most certainly NOT THE BETTER TEAM. Not one bit. We were the superior team...not even close today. We are more talented...and...BETTER. and you're right...it was a bullshit mother ****ing PI call...but it should have been a no call...and a no call still resulted in a big gain...no?
Posts: 56,356