Football Keep fucking doubting Damon Huard... - Page 4

**RealSNR** · 10-01-2006, 12:28 PM

The title of the thread says it all....

fuck you doubters. He plays with heart, and he continues to get the job done. You people who bash Huard, I don't even consider true fans. He plays his heart out every Sunday, and you continue to bash him...

Keep bashing him, I'll keep backing him.

Hootie · 10-16-2006, 09:05 PM

mmaddogg, apparently Arizona's D is a little underrated.

we could've started Dan Marino in his prime at Pitt yesterday and lost by 4 TD's...

Hammock Parties · 10-16-2006, 09:07 PM

Huard > Grossman

Hootie · 10-16-2006, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

The problem with blaming Solari/Hermie is that they are limited in the ability to adjust the game plan because Huard can't stretch the defense.

The Steelers did to Huard what the Ravens used to do to Gannon.

They put everybody in the box, and played everything tight, daring Huard to beat them deep.

They knew that he couldn't.

I never once said Huard was better than Green, or that Huard is even remotely as good as Trent Green. Of course he isn't. All I've been saying since Denver is Huard is a very good backup QB. That's what he is. He isn't starting QB caliber, not even close. He does a good job managing a football game. The Chiefs had ZERO chance to ever win that game yesterday...Huard had little to do with it.

Mosbonian · 10-16-2006, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

mmaddog.

Check out this thread.

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showt...52#post3482552

GoFeisty.....

That deserves rep!!!!

I can't believe that both GoFeisty and Hootme did a 180 all on the same thread!!!

mmaddog
*******

Mosbonian · 10-16-2006, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

mmaddogg, apparently Arizona's D is a little underrated.

we could've started Dan Marino in his prime at Pitt yesterday and lost by 4 TD's...

An assumption that you cannot back up.

mmaddog
*******

milkman · 10-16-2006, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Huard > Grossman

You and idiot.

Hootie · 10-16-2006, 09:10 PM

I never did a ****ing 180.

I never said Huard brought more to the table than Green. EVER.

Go find me some place on this website where I ever said Huard was a better QB than Trent. I've been saying in everything I've wrote for WPI that as soon as Trent comes back we can be a contender as long as Huard keeps us around .500.

Never once did I imply Huard should remain starting QB once Green is healthy.

I don't even know what you're talking about anymore.

milkman · 10-16-2006, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmaddog

GoFeisty.....

That deserves rep!!!!

I can't believe that both GoFeisty and Hootme did a 180 all on the same thread!!!

mmaddog
*******

I have to say that Hootie did, and always has, asserted that Huard is only a quality backup.

GoFeisty is the idiot who suggested that Huard might be better than Green.

Mosbonian · 10-16-2006, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

I don't even know what I'm talking about anymore.

fixed your post...

mmaddog
*******

Hootie · 10-16-2006, 09:12 PM

How can I not back it up!? LJ ran 15 times for 26 yards...what ****ing QB is going to be successful when he's facing 3rd and 7 down by 21 in the 17th minute of the game?! Are you kidding me? The game plan never allowed Huard to do ANYTHING. He had no chance. On my list of goats from yesterday's game, Huard is near the bottom.

Mosbonian · 10-16-2006, 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I have to say that Hootie did, and always has, asserted that Huard is only a quality backup.

GoFeisty is the idiot who suggested that Huard might be better than Green.

These statements look contradictory to me....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

Green brings a lot more to the table than Huard does. A LOT MORE.

I like Huard, I really do...but his batted balls are getting ridiculous...and Green is just simply better in this offense. There is a reason Huard is a backup..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

mmaddog, you're really putting this loss on Huard?! The guy did nothing wrong. The offensive game plan was shit, he made some good throws, didn't make many bad decisions...blah blah blah

This game was on the defense, not Huard. Huard could've been Tom friggin' Brady out there and still lost by 30+. No chance with the game plan the coaching staff drew up...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

It's funny...I bet mmaddogg was praying for a Huard slip-up because we made him look like such a dumbass for three weeks in a row. Except Huard had nothing to do with the loss this week...he took no sacks, made good throws (again)...there is nothing you can do when you're 3rd and 8 against one of the leagues best secondaries and your running game is doing absolutely nothing. Really...what did you expect from the guy? He threw one INT when the game was already long over......

mmaddog
*******

Hootie · 10-16-2006, 09:23 PM

how are those contradictory?! At all?

I said...he throws too many batted balls. True. He also makes a lot of good throws. He's a friggin' backup QB.

Green is an established veteran QB that has been to two pro-bowls. I would never suggest Huard is a better QB than Green, ever.

All I ever did was say he is one of the better back-up QB's in the NFL. It's true. Should he be a starter? No. Never. But he understands his role and executes very well. He plays within his abilities, and yes, he has limited abilities.

I watched the game just like everyone else did...Huard isn't even CLOSE to the reason we weren't competitive against Pittsburgh.

milkman · 10-16-2006, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mmaddog

These statements look contradictory to me....

mmaddog
*******

Yeah, I felt he thought too highly of Huard, and he was disappointed with, and critical of, his game yesterday.

I just thought it would be only fair to point out that he never claimed he was anymore than a b/u.

But I also thought he gave Huard too much credit.

milkman · 10-16-2006, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

I watched the game just like everyone else did...Huard isn't even CLOSE to the reason we weren't competitive against Pittsburgh.

This is where I disagree.

Pittsburgh completely ignored any possibility of a deep ball, because they've seen enough to know that he isn't capable of beating them deep.

The fact that the offense couldn't sustain any kind of drive did nothing to help the defense catch it's breath.

Both sides of the ball sucked, and Huard's limitations were a big reason that the offensive side sucked as much as it did.

Hammock Parties · 10-16-2006, 09:33 PM

Larry Johnson sucked, too. If only we had Priest. *sigh*

10-01-2006, 12:28 PM
RealSNR Special Teams ACE!!! Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Where the hell is SNR Casino cash: $2230208	Keep fucking doubting Damon Huard... The title of the thread says it all.... fuck you doubters. He plays with heart, and he continues to get the job done. You people who bash Huard, I don't even consider true fans. He plays his heart out every Sunday, and you continue to bash him... Keep bashing him, I'll keep backing him.
Posts: 90,558

10-16-2006, 09:05 PM	#46
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	mmaddogg, apparently Arizona's D is a little underrated. we could've started Dan Marino in his prime at Pitt yesterday and lost by 4 TD's...
Posts: 56,356

10-16-2006, 09:07 PM	#47
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4580478	Huard > Grossman __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,312

10-16-2006, 09:10 PM	#52
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	I never did a ****ing 180. I never said Huard brought more to the table than Green. EVER. Go find me some place on this website where I ever said Huard was a better QB than Trent. I've been saying in everything I've wrote for WPI that as soon as Trent comes back we can be a contender as long as Huard keeps us around .500. Never once did I imply Huard should remain starting QB once Green is healthy. I don't even know what you're talking about anymore.
Posts: 56,356

10-16-2006, 09:12 PM	#55
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	How can I not back it up!? LJ ran 15 times for 26 yards...what ****ing QB is going to be successful when he's facing 3rd and 7 down by 21 in the 17th minute of the game?! Are you kidding me? The game plan never allowed Huard to do ANYTHING. He had no chance. On my list of goats from yesterday's game, Huard is near the bottom.
Posts: 56,356

10-16-2006, 09:23 PM	#57
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	how are those contradictory?! At all? I said...he throws too many batted balls. True. He also makes a lot of good throws. He's a friggin' backup QB. Green is an established veteran QB that has been to two pro-bowls. I would never suggest Huard is a better QB than Green, ever. All I ever did was say he is one of the better back-up QB's in the NFL. It's true. Should he be a starter? No. Never. But he understands his role and executes very well. He plays within his abilities, and yes, he has limited abilities. I watched the game just like everyone else did...Huard isn't even CLOSE to the reason we weren't competitive against Pittsburgh.
Posts: 56,356

10-16-2006, 09:33 PM	#60
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4580478	Larry Johnson sucked, too. If only we had Priest. sigh __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,312