Any chance we draft Jarrett or Smardzija? - Page 2

supercoupe91 · 01-03-2007, 09:42 PM

With the first pick?

I know we have a ton of holes, but a WR to replace Parker seems like the most glaring.

InChiefsHeaven · 01-03-2007, 10:15 PM

Samie is not our worst problem by far. We will go DT or CB or something, but our first rounder will not be a WR. And probably shouldn't be.

Silock · 01-03-2007, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Dole

Is there ever?

True... not like that's stopped us before.

BWillie · 01-03-2007, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock

True... not like that's stopped us before.

You gotta take what you get. I don't think any D-Tackle we get could be as big of a bust as Ryan Simms. I just don't think it's possible.

Frosty · 01-03-2007, 10:23 PM

If there are any stud OL, DL or CB players available when the Chiefs pick in the first round, get them then and then pick up USC's Steve Smith in the second.

**Bowser** · 01-03-2007, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arc

If there are any stud OL, DL or CB players available when the Chiefs pick in the first round, get them then and then pick up USC's Steve Smith in the second.

No way he lasts until we pick in the second. He may not MAKE the second.

milkman · 01-03-2007, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InChiefsHell

Samie is not our worst problem by far. We will go DT or CB or something, but our first rounder will not be a WR. And probably shouldn't be.

If a WR is the best athlete on the board, a WR damn well should be our first rounder.

There isn't one position on this team that can't be upgraded.

supercoupe91 · 01-03-2007, 10:27 PM

Defensive End cannot be upgraded.

Silock · 01-03-2007, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

If a WR is the best athlete on the board, a WR damn well should be our first rounder.

There isn't one position on this team that can't be upgraded.

RB.

Frosty · 01-03-2007, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

No way he lasts until we pick in the second. He may not MAKE the second.

I've seen late second, early third. I'm betting though, that after the combine, Jarrett and Smith will trade places. I don't think Jarrett will run a good time and the Mike Williams whispers will start, droppping his stock. That kind of crap always seems to happen after the combine.

milkman · 01-03-2007, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock

RB.

We certainly aren't going to replace LJ, but it would be nice to find one that can take about 100 carries.

I'm sure the same question could have been raised when LJ was picked.

Hoover · 01-03-2007, 10:33 PM

I think we should keep Parker as a #3. We lack any type of quality WR depth.

Silock · 01-03-2007, 10:33 PM

Well, he said "upgraded." There's building depth, and then there's upgrading. Drafting a stud RB would be for depth, not to upgrade the position.

milkman · 01-03-2007, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silock

Well, he said "upgraded." There's building depth, and then there's upgrading. Drafting a stud RB would be for depth, not to upgrade the position.

If you upgrade depth, you are upgrading the position.

LJ isn't a position, he's the top player on the team at his position.

supercoupe91 · 01-03-2007, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

We certainly aren't going to replace LJ, but it would be nice to find one that can take about 100 carries.

I'm sure the same question could have been raised when LJ was picked.

Adrian Peterson can take 100 carries.

Silock · 01-03-2007, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

If you upgrade depth, you are upgrading the position.

LJ isn't a position, he's the top player on the team at his position.

Semantics. In any case, I doubt we'd be able to draft anyone that would be better than Bennett at this point.

01-03-2007, 09:42 PM
supercoupe91 Starter Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	Any chance we draft Jarrett or Smardzija? With the first pick? I know we have a ton of holes, but a WR to replace Parker seems like the most glaring.
Posts: 401

01-03-2007, 10:15 PM	#16
InChiefsHeaven Rockin' yer FACE OFF! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Casino cash: $3744937	Samie is not our worst problem by far. We will go DT or CB or something, but our first rounder will not be a WR. And probably shouldn't be. __________________ We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... Die Donks, DIE!! Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!!
Posts: 25,752

01-03-2007, 10:23 PM	#19
Frosty Go Beavers! Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Warshington Casino cash: $5558243	If there are any stud OL, DL or CB players available when the Chiefs pick in the first round, get them then and then pick up USC's Steve Smith in the second.
Posts: 14,501

01-03-2007, 10:27 PM	#22
supercoupe91 Starter Join Date: Nov 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	Defensive End cannot be upgraded.
Posts: 401

01-03-2007, 10:33 PM	#26
Hoover Rufus Dawes Jr. Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $1508179	I think we should keep Parker as a #3. We lack any type of quality WR depth.
Posts: 17,376

01-03-2007, 10:33 PM	#27
Silock MVP Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Overland Park Casino cash: $10020882	Well, he said "upgraded." There's building depth, and then there's upgrading. Drafting a stud RB would be for depth, not to upgrade the position.
Posts: 19,908