|
|
04-19-2013, 02:46 PM | #1 |
PermaBanned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jouissance
Casino cash: $10011570
|
Correct. The chart now undervalues the picks.
|
Posts: 47,521
|
04-20-2013, 12:22 AM | #2 |
Keep doubting J MFing Houston
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ft.lauderdale
Casino cash: $4778036
|
|
Posts: 21,429
|
04-20-2013, 12:24 AM | #3 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Nov 2010
Casino cash: $7722645
|
Quote:
You can talk about how long ago it was invented as much as you want. That has nothing to do with the fact that you can map the trades that occur on the chart with nearly a 1:1 correlation. The ultimate compensation is decided on the players available, so you'll either be above or below the line, but you'll be in the ballpark. |
|
Posts: 24,331
|
04-18-2013, 11:19 PM | #4 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $1974497
|
The other key is at Quarterback. If Geno is average, it's a so-so pick. If we get a QB in the next 1-2 years who ends up being better than Geno, then the QB part of this equation doesn't even matter.
It's not the path I'd take. But let's be real here. If the Chiefs find a good QB, nobody will really care about Alex Smith or Joeckel or Albert. |
Posts: 48,230
|
04-18-2013, 11:22 PM | #5 |
www.nfl-forecast.com
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $2261769
|
Would you rather have:
Albert and ______ or Joeckel and 54? Put any of top 15 prospects in the blank and tell me this is a good trade. |
Posts: 45,543
|
04-18-2013, 11:25 PM | #6 | |
XBOX GT MAVS ACE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Casino cash: $10019303
|
Quote:
regardless, you were getting Joeckell no matter what. Albert, or no Albert. THats why they wanted Albert to move to RT in the first place. So your equation is do you want albert, and joeckell, or Joeckell, and 54........
__________________
Resident Browns fan I’m not here to argue about Alex Smith. Fastest Ignore user on CP |
|
Posts: 18,683
|
04-18-2013, 11:34 PM | #7 |
Pritay Pritay Pritay Good
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The State of Euphoria
Casino cash: $3325412
|
When a guy can't work out a new deal with two completely different front offices, him staying is a rather unlikely part of the equation. Thus, the question should actually be this. Would you rather have:
Bowe on the franchise tag, Joeckel, and Albert leaving without us getting a single thing in return or Bowe re-signed, Joeckel, and a 2nd round pick for Albert? |
Posts: 6,779
|
04-18-2013, 11:39 PM | #8 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $1974497
|
Quote:
If Geno was a consensus #1, the Chiefs wouldn't be begging to get rid of 1.1. The trade comp for Albert isn't unreasonable. The main reason he hasn't been traded yet is money. If the Dolphins don't want to pay him, that tells you his salary demands are too high. If they do trade for him, it will be interesting to see how reasonable his salary is. |
|
Posts: 48,230
|
04-18-2013, 11:42 PM | #9 | |
www.nfl-forecast.com
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $2261769
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 45,543
|
04-18-2013, 11:43 PM | #10 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
What? |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
04-18-2013, 11:50 PM | #11 |
www.nfl-forecast.com
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $2261769
|
Let me try again.
1. I'm suspecting that the Dolphins will sign Albert to a reasonable deal. I'd take that deal for the Chiefs. 2. Big Rock argued that Albert was unsignable based on inability of the last two front offices to sign him. My response: a. Pioli was incompetent b. Reid/Dorsey seem to be locked in on Joeckel. And willing to create a spot to for him, even if doing so won't make the Cheifs markedly better over the next 3 years. I don't think these two cases prove that Albert is unsignable. |
Posts: 45,543
|
04-18-2013, 11:35 PM | #12 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $1974497
|
Quote:
Let's also not rule out KC perhaps setting the price for Albert, so he can cut his demands. |
|
Posts: 48,230
|
04-18-2013, 11:25 PM | #13 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $4580478
|
post is spot on
we are paying a premium price to upgrade from "very good" LT to "hope this guy is elite." it's like paying a website a premium price for chiefs news you already have.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 278,306
|
04-18-2013, 11:33 PM | #14 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $1744088
|
Quote:
How many times should I post the breakdowns from LAST YEARS DRAFT TRADES that show how teams followed the draft value chart really closely. The only two that didn't were the RG3 and Richardson trades...the rest followed the chart. |
|
Posts: 47,146
|
04-18-2013, 11:40 PM | #15 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
JFC. So, you and ALL of your buddies have SPAMMED this forum with "It's CHEAP to take a QB" because of the new CBA, right? But, you're going to say that compensation should remain the same? What the ****? I don't give a flying **** what Washington gave up for RGIII. Any team that is going to demand the same compensation Pre-2011 CBA as Post 2011 CBA is smoking crack. ANY salesman worth his salt would say "**** off". New rules. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|