If not #1, where?

[O.city]

I like Geno, I like Wilson, I actually like Barkley. Glennon is a little meh to me at this point. Hell, I even think Landry Jones has some upside.


I know this is the wrong way to think about it, but I really just want them to evaluate who the best guy is and take him at 1. Seeing all these other teams draft QB's high and succeed, yeah, I'm a little jealous.

I'd rather us take a QB and him bust, than take a DL or OT and him be ok but really just meh.

It's a stupid way to think about it, and it's wrong, but damn it, you gotta try to get that guy or you can't win. So just take your top QB. If they draft Geno, or Wilson at 1 and he busts, fine.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by O.city

I'd rather us take a QB and him bust, than take a DL or OT and him be ok but really just meh.

It's a stupid way to think about it, and it's wrong, but damn it, you gotta try to get that guy or you can't win. So just take your top QB. If they draft Geno, or Wilson at 1 and he busts, fine.

It's evident that Dorsey and Reid will disagree. I don't think they take a QB at #1 overall unless they're certain he'll be a solid NFL QB.

If there's a bust factor, they'll pass. They've both already alluded to that publicly.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

It's evident that Dorsey and Reid will disagree. I don't think they take a QB at #1 overall unless they're certain he'll be a solid NFL QB.

If there's a bust factor, they'll pass. They've both already alluded to that publicly.

Oh, I'm positive they will.


I'm just saying form my perspective, a little part of me just wants to draft a Qb in the first round. If he busts, **** it, I've lived thru DL bust after DL bust. I'll deal with it.

Like I said, its a stupid way to look at it.

Also, there is gonna be a bust factor with whoever they pick.

[ModSocks]

Originally Posted by O.city

Oh, I'm positive they will.


I'm just saying form my perspective, a little part of me just wants to draft a Qb in the first round. If he busts, **** it, I've lived thru DL bust after DL bust. I'll deal with it.

Like I said, its a stupid way to look at it.

Also, there is gonna be a bust factor with whoever they pick.

This.

I can't remember the last time someone said, "Man, if we DONT take that DT, it will set our franchise back for years", or "man, see that LT right there, if we don't take him this year, we blew our opportunity to land a potentially great one".

How often do you regret not taking a LT vs how often you regret not taking a QB?

The QB is worth the risk, even if he does grade out lower than the DT, because the reward is far higher.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

This.

I can't remember the last time someone said, "Man, if we DONT take that DT, it will set our franchise back for years", or "man, see that LT right there, if we don't take him this year, we blew our opportunity to land a potentially great one".

How often do you regret not taking a LT vs how often you regret not taking a QB?

The QB is worth the risk, even if he does grade out lower than the DT, because the reward is far higher.

Well, thats the way we fans view it, I doubt the GM and HC do.