Who do you choose?

milehighfan · 11-28-2005, 01:36 PM

If you had to choose, would you take (Priest(injured) and LJ) or would you take (Dayne, M. Anderson, and T. Bell)?

**Lzen** · 11-28-2005, 01:37 PM

Well, duh. That's no contest.

milehighfan · 11-28-2005, 01:40 PM

I like T. Bell a lot. Plus, they can be fairly effective with Mike Anderson and Dayne if they have to. Probably not as explosive as LJ, but they can suffer an injury and still be fairly productive. I think priest is done.

**Dunit35** · 11-28-2005, 01:42 PM

Priest, LJ.

jspchief · 11-28-2005, 01:52 PM

Priest and LJ. No contest.

That duo in Denver's blocking scheme would easily out-perform your current RB corps.

**Iowanian** · 11-28-2005, 01:54 PM

This isn't much tougher than say....Choosing between collecting $200 owed vs having Bill Braskey kick my ass.

Priest and LJ hands down, and anyone who would take Denver's backfield instead probably wears a hockey helmet during waking hours...or at least should.

milehighfan · 11-28-2005, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

Priest and LJ. No contest.

That duo in Denver's blocking scheme would easily out-perform your current RB corps.

So, instead of (Bell, Dayne and Anderson) you would choose Shanahan?

vailpass · 11-28-2005, 01:58 PM

If I'm understanding the question correctly the option is for an injured, and therefore unable to play, Priest plus LJ vs. Denver's three RBs.
In this scenario you have to factor in the possibility that LJ goes down leaving you with nothing or one of Denver's backs goes down lwaving you with the other two.
IMHO that makes the choice a whole lot tougher.

**Iowanian** · 11-28-2005, 01:59 PM

Its a damn shame that the pregnant mothers of so many Donk fans chose to eat their Cheerios with Night Train and thalidimide instead of milk and sugar.

milehighfan · 11-28-2005, 02:03 PM

I actually think LJ is a hell of a back. I'm not sold that the chief will be able to control him off the field though. If the chiefs don't make the playoffs this year and maybe next, I expect LJ will be a problem. Denver has had decent luck with keeping egos in check in the runnin back area.

jspchief · 11-28-2005, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milehighfan

So, instead of (Bell, Dayne and Anderson) you would choose Shanahan?

No.

What I'm saying is that I belive Denver's RBs are a product of their system, but in general are average to below average. Holmes and LJ would be more likely to succeed regardless of the system they were in, and would be more successful than Bell, Dayne, Anderson in any system.

What the hell do any of Denver's RBs do better than Holmes and Johnson?

**Rausch** · 11-28-2005, 02:06 PM

I like Anderson better than Bell, but LJ better than either of them.

Anderson is probably the more polished HB but LJ has far more talent...

vailpass · 11-28-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief

No.

What I'm saying is that I belive Denver's RBs are a product of their system, but in general are average to below average. Holmes and LJ would be more likely to succeed regardless of the system they were in, and would be more successful than Bell, Dayne, Anderson in any system.

What the hell do any of Denver's RBs do better than Holmes and Johnson?

Acquire playoff tickets for their families

Seek · 11-28-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

If I'm understanding the question correctly the option is for an injured, and therefore unable to play, Priest plus LJ vs. Denver's three RBs.
In this scenario you have to factor in the possibility that LJ goes down leaving you with nothing or one of Denver's backs goes down lwaving you with the other two.
IMHO that makes the choice a whole lot tougher.

Hey, Dee Brown,Mackenzie Smith and T. Richardson are something.

**HemiEd** · 11-28-2005, 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass

If I'm understanding the question correctly the option is for an injured, and therefore unable to play, Priest plus LJ vs. Denver's three RBs.
In this scenario you have to factor in the possibility that LJ goes down leaving you with nothing or one of Denver's backs goes down lwaving you with the other two.
IMHO that makes the choice a whole lot tougher.

Yep, when LJ went down yesterday it was not a comfortable feeling I had. It was stated in some other posts, we need to start getting Dee Brown some reps. I keep hearing that LJ demands to stay in, well DV needs to stand up to him and tell him to set his ass down.

11-28-2005, 01:36 PM
milehighfan milehighfan Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sedalia, MO Casino cash: $10004900	Who do you choose? If you had to choose, would you take (Priest(injured) and LJ) or would you take (Dayne, M. Anderson, and T. Bell)?
Posts: 112

11-28-2005, 01:37 PM	#2
Lzen Supporter Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Jan Quadrant Vincent 16 Casino cash: $2230692	Well, duh. That's no contest. __________________ If at first you don't succeed ...skydiving is not for you.
Posts: 41,343

11-28-2005, 01:40 PM	#3
milehighfan milehighfan Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sedalia, MO Casino cash: $10004900	I like T. Bell a lot. Plus, they can be fairly effective with Mike Anderson and Dayne if they have to. Probably not as explosive as LJ, but they can suffer an injury and still be fairly productive. I think priest is done.
Posts: 112

11-28-2005, 01:42 PM	#4
Dunit35 Keepin it Real Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Oklahoma Casino cash: $1547045	Priest, LJ.
Posts: 10,489

11-28-2005, 01:52 PM	#5
jspchief BAMF Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Your Face Casino cash: $9998710	Priest and LJ. No contest. That duo in Denver's blocking scheme would easily out-perform your current RB corps. __________________ Courage is not the absence of fear but rather the judgment that something is more important than fear. The brave may not live forever but the cautious do not live at all.
Posts: 27,207

11-28-2005, 01:54 PM	#6
Iowanian Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Utopia Casino cash: $4768454	This isn't much tougher than say....Choosing between collecting $200 owed vs having Bill Braskey kick my ass. Priest and LJ hands down, and anyone who would take Denver's backfield instead probably wears a hockey helmet during waking hours...or at least should.
Posts: 61,528

11-28-2005, 01:58 PM	#8
vailpass Psycho Bag Of Squanch Join Date: Sep 2001 Casino cash: $9594244	If I'm understanding the question correctly the option is for an injured, and therefore unable to play, Priest plus LJ vs. Denver's three RBs. In this scenario you have to factor in the possibility that LJ goes down leaving you with nothing or one of Denver's backs goes down lwaving you with the other two. IMHO that makes the choice a whole lot tougher. __________________ “Education is a weapon whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.” Joseph Stalin
Posts: 69,591

11-28-2005, 01:59 PM	#9
Iowanian Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Utopia Casino cash: $4768454	Its a damn shame that the pregnant mothers of so many Donk fans chose to eat their Cheerios with Night Train and thalidimide instead of milk and sugar.
Posts: 61,528

11-28-2005, 02:03 PM	#10
milehighfan milehighfan Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Sedalia, MO Casino cash: $10004900	I actually think LJ is a hell of a back. I'm not sold that the chief will be able to control him off the field though. If the chiefs don't make the playoffs this year and maybe next, I expect LJ will be a problem. Denver has had decent luck with keeping egos in check in the runnin back area.
Posts: 112