Football Jets trade up to #3 - Page 20

ShowtimeSBMVP · 03-17-2018, 08:52 AM

Huge trade: Jets acquired No. 3 overall pick from Colts for No. 6 overall pick, 37th overall pick, 49th overall pick and our 2019 2nd round pick.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 17, 2018

**Rain Man** · 03-19-2018, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Hopkins.

Yeah, that's a good option. Le'v'e'on Bell too if you have an offensive line that's allowed to hold.

But I think Kelce might be top 3.

Bewbies · 03-19-2018, 01:40 PM

I have a hard time seeing Dorsey move off having the pick of QB's at 1. If NYG are going QB (and they should be) they aren't moving either.

Hard to see the Jets being able to move up any higher than they are.

Also makes that #4 Browns pick the one that will be in play for QB 4 should that arise. Have to be a HUGE haul for me to move back if I've got my choice of the #1 QB and the #1 not QB on the board in the same draft.

Mile High Mania · 03-19-2018, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

I have a hard time seeing Dorsey move off having the pick of QB's at 1. If NYG are going QB (and they should be) they aren't moving either.

Hard to see the Jets being able to move up any higher than they are.

Also makes that #4 Browns pick the one that will be in play for QB 4 should that arise. Have to be a HUGE haul for me to move back if I've got my choice of the #1 QB and the #1 not QB on the board in the same draft.

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

Sassy Squatch · 03-19-2018, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

They can get way more than that for the #1 pick.

raybec 4 · 03-19-2018, 02:35 PM

Chris Ballard has a chance to make a real impact with a good draft, but he should have been more aggressive in FA also

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-19-2018, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

That's ****ing terrible

Gravedigger · 03-19-2018, 02:38 PM

Yeah Buffalo is kind of hosed at this point. If you have just two QBs that you want, they'll both likely be gone by the time you have the ability to move up to draft them.

You could trade with NYG, but I don't think they'd let go of Saquon Barkley if he's on the board, and if they did you'd have to give three years of number 1's kind of equity to jump up that high to that particular spot. You can hope to take away the Brown's number 4 but I think they'll charge you about as much as the Giants will. Another problem is convincing another team to drop that far back. I feel bad for the Bills, their moves thus far got hosed by the Jets moving up with Indy.

Bewbies · 03-19-2018, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

They can get more than that for the #4, why on earth would you give up the option to pick the QB you want and settle for what's left for just 2 picks? Dumb.

Bewbies · 03-19-2018, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger

Yeah Buffalo is kind of hosed at this point. If you have just two QBs that you want, they'll both likely be gone by the time you have the ability to move up to draft them.

You could trade with NYG, but I don't think they'd let go of Saquon Barkley if he's on the board, and if they did you'd have to give three years of number 1's kind of equity to jump up that high to that particular spot. You can hope to take away the Brown's number 4 but I think they'll charge you about as much as the Giants will. Another problem is convincing another team to drop that far back. I feel bad for the Bills, their moves thus far got hosed by the Jets moving up with Indy.

Giants taking Barkley would be great for that #4 pick. All the sudden the price to trade into that slot goes through the roof.

But if the Giants pass on a QB and any of them hit, in 2 years when Eli is gone they're going to look really, really dumb. Like John Elway is your GM dumb.

Mother****erJones · 03-19-2018, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

It’d take a whole ****ing lot more than that. Try 12, 22, 2 2s and probably a 3rd rounder.

Bewbies · 03-19-2018, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

It’d take a whole ****ing lot more than that. Try 12, 22, 2 2s and probably a 3rd rounder.

And next year's 1.

Mother****erJones · 03-19-2018, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

And next year's 1.

Ya they’d basically be giving up all their picks from rounds 1-3 and something next year.

Red Dawg · 03-19-2018, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

Ya they’d basically be giving up all their picks from rounds 1-3 and something next year.

Dorsey moving from 1 would be a mistake. They will win enough not have 1 next year and probably have to trade up to get a QB. He better stay at 1 and take Darnold. He won't get this chance next year.I

Kiimo · 03-19-2018, 03:28 PM

Agree but def not Darnold

KChiefs1 · 03-19-2018, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

Browns should keep #4, trade #1 to BUF for the #12 and #24.

Still about 1100 to give to the Jets.

03-17-2018, 08:52 AM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3506009	Jets trade up to 3 Huge trade: Jets acquired No. 3 overall pick from Colts for No. 6 overall pick, 37th overall pick, 49th overall pick and our 2019 2nd round pick. — Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 17, 2018
Posts: 23,755

03-19-2018, 01:40 PM	#287
Bewbies Ith Fuhtbawl Time Join Date: Apr 2010 Casino cash: $9999900	I have a hard time seeing Dorsey move off having the pick of QB's at 1. If NYG are going QB (and they should be) they aren't moving either. Hard to see the Jets being able to move up any higher than they are. Also makes that #4 Browns pick the one that will be in play for QB 4 should that arise. Have to be a HUGE haul for me to move back if I've got my choice of the #1 QB and the #1 not QB on the board in the same draft.
Posts: 10,085

03-19-2018, 02:35 PM	#290
raybec 4 MVP Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: East Jabip Casino cash: $5073807	Chris Ballard has a chance to make a real impact with a good draft, but he should have been more aggressive in FA also
Posts: 10,921

03-19-2018, 02:38 PM	#292
Gravedigger Plays to win the game! Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lees Summit Casino cash: $7213101	Yeah Buffalo is kind of hosed at this point. If you have just two QBs that you want, they'll both likely be gone by the time you have the ability to move up to draft them. You could trade with NYG, but I don't think they'd let go of Saquon Barkley if he's on the board, and if they did you'd have to give three years of number 1's kind of equity to jump up that high to that particular spot. You can hope to take away the Brown's number 4 but I think they'll charge you about as much as the Giants will. Another problem is convincing another team to drop that far back. I feel bad for the Bills, their moves thus far got hosed by the Jets moving up with Indy.
Posts: 7,582

03-19-2018, 03:28 PM	#299
Kiimo MVP Join Date: Feb 2013 Location: Studio City, CA Casino cash: $3848742	Agree but def not Darnold
Posts: 12,729