Nick Foles News

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Maclins rookie deal is about to run out, too and he would require a big contract. No way he is worth full value because of just that.

Are we supposed to tie up 20 million a year on 2 receivers?

Foles probably increased his stoc, but its not like the Eagles wouldnt take a premium third for him...he doesnt fit their system.

youre not getting Maclin for anything less than a 2nd. So if someone wants Maclin, pony up the pick and cash. If not, I dont know what to tell you lol

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

youre not getting Maclin for anything less than a 2nd. So if someone wants Maclin, pony up the pick and cash. If not, I dont know what to tell you lol

YOU JUST MADE MY POINT FOR ME.

He is NOT worth the 875 ponts he was originally worth, he is now worth around 500.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Maclins rookie deal is about to run out, too and he would require a big contract. No way he is worth full value because of just that.

Are we supposed to tie up 20 million a year on 2 receivers?

Foles probably increased his stoc, but its not like the Eagles wouldnt take a premium third for him...he doesnt fit their system.

2 good WRs? Yeah, don't really care.


I'd trade first picks, give them a 3rd. What I proposed earlier was probably too much.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by O.city

2 good WRs? Yeah, don't really care.


I'd trade first picks, give them a 3rd. What I proposed earlier was probably too much.

You trade picks, plus get Foles and Maclin. If I'm trading out of #1 overall, you better damn well get back a north load.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

You trade picks, plus get Foles and Maclin. If I'm trading out of #1 overall, you better damn well get back a north load.

We should, but we won't if we trade it. The talent at the top doesn't justify it at this point.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by O.city

2 good WRs? Yeah, don't really care.


I'd trade first picks, give them a 3rd. What I proposed earlier was probably too much.

1.1

for

1.4
foles
maclin

and next years first

[BossChief]

This draft is these guys chance to show that things will be done differently than in the past.

If we trade for a backup, nothing has changed.

Foles is to Reid/Dorsey as Cassel is to Pioli.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by BossChief

This draft is these guys chance to show that things will be done differently than in the past.

If we trade for a backup, nothing has changed.

Foles is to Reid/Dorsey as Cassel is to *****.

This.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by BossChief

This draft is these guys chance to show that things will be done differently than in the past.

If we trade for a backup, nothing has changed.

Foles is to Reid/Dorsey as Cassel is to *****.

What a difference four years make. Pioli was defended to the death for a pulling a Carl-lite, since Pioli isn't even worthy of sniffing early-90s Carl's jock.

[DaneMcCloud]

IMO, trading for Foles is a last resort option.

I'd rather see the Chiefs acquire Smith or Flynn along with a developmental prospect because if they trade for Foles, he gets two years to prove he doesn't suck ass.

And that's most likely, two years too many.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

IMO, trading for Foles is a last resort option.

I'd rather see the Chiefs acquire Smith or Flynn along with a developmental prospect because if they trade for Foles, he gets two years to prove he doesn't suck ass.

And that's most likely, two years too many.

If I'm being frank, I don't really want any of the three. But if I'm forced, I'd probably rather go with Smith for these reasons, but I think whoever we bring in is gonna get 2 years.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

IMO, trading for Foles is a last resort option.

I'd rather see the Chiefs acquire Smith or Flynn along with a developmental prospect because if they trade for Foles, he gets two years to prove he doesn't suck ass.

And that's most likely, two years too many.

If they trade for Alex Smith, he's getting 2 years too, maybe more.

Face it, if they bring in somebody with a name, that person is most likely going to be "the man" for the foreseeable future.

[penbrook]

We have no idea what Reid and Dorsey will do. He has been known to do a 360 in every draft.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

If they trade for Alex Smith, he's getting 2 years too, maybe more.

Face it, if they bring in somebody with a name, that person is most likely going to be "the man" for the foreseeable future.

How so? If they trade for smith I think they draft either Bray, Manuel, or Jones. We now know Cassel is gone I doubt they bring in another vet to backup Alex Smith. The only question is what round do they draft a QB?

To me Alex Smith for a 4th is great if Geno Smith is the #1 pick. We know the odds of a 4th round QB producing like Alex Smith arent great.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini

How so? If they trade for smith I think they draft either Bray, Manuel, or Jones. We now know Cassel is gone I doubt they bring in another vet to backup Alex Smith. The only question is what round do they draft a QB?

To me Alex Smith for a 4th is great if Geno Smith is the #1 pick. We know the odds of a 4th round QB producing like Alex Smith arent great.

Bray and Manuel are both probably 2 years away from being fully ready, so Smith is gonna start at least those 2 years. (Jones won't ever be NFL ready so he's not worth discussing.)

IF they were to get Smith for a 4th, he would probably be the backup. I don't see that happening though.

I see him coming in here and starting. He'll win just enough for them to keep trotting him out there. 4 years from now, we'll be right back where we are today.