Chiefs Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall - Page 12

Hoover · 03-15-2013, 07:48 AM

It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him

but they are helping create a market for a trade.

Apparently Jaws loves the kid.

Carlota69 · 03-15-2013, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

I agree with this. I think that's what makes this off-season and the Chiefs position at 1.1 in the draft so interesting/exciting.

Exactly. No one knows what were going to do, and with all the moves they've made so far, theres no real glaring need. The Chiefs could draft whoever they love the most (it would be nice if they loved a QB the most tho). Its very interesting.

Mr. Laz · 03-15-2013, 11:16 AM

Maybe Dorsey is the 1%

Maybe Dorsey is completely separating the Draft from everything else.

Maybe trades,signings,cuts,salary,player history have absolutely nothing to do with what they are going to do in the draft.

Then again, maybe people are just trying really hard to believe what they want to believe. Most teams give indicators of what they are going to try to do in the draft by who they cut/sign etc during the offseason.

**ptlyon** · 03-15-2013, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

No he sucks because he sucks. His arm sucks. His size sucks. His mobility sucks. His leadership sucks. Chase Daniel sucks and it has nothing to do with Drew Brees.

I nominate you to start the"Chase Daniels Does, Always Has, and Always Will Suck" thread

**BossChief** · 03-15-2013, 11:18 AM

If we came out and said we were seriously interested in taking Geno at 1, nobody would call to trade up.

I think there is a real chance we draft Geno IF nobody offers a good trade down haul.

patteeu · 03-15-2013, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Therein lies the problem.

The Anti-QB at 1.1 people have been shouting forever that the Chiefs will NEVER take a QB at 1.1. They can't admit that it's a legitimate ****ing possibility.

I don't think there are very many anti-QB at 1.1 people. Maybe a few, but it seems like the pro-Geno people tend to imagine that anyone who isn't all-in on Geno is anti-QB at 1.1. Maybe I'm wrong, but I know I've been accused of being anti-QB several times and that's not true at all.

Frazod · 03-15-2013, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. SyphiLaz

mizzou butthurt always makes me laugh

Window licking reeruns make me laugh.

patteeu · 03-15-2013, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

No he sucks because he sucks. His arm sucks. His accuracy sucks. His size sucks. His leadership sucks. Chase Daniel sucks and it has nothing to do with Drew Brees.

Be honest... you don't have a clue who this Chase Daniel guy is, do you?

Mr. Laz · 03-15-2013, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

Window licking reeruns make me laugh.

window licking?

must be a MU trailer park thing

MagicHef · 03-15-2013, 11:33 AM

I know you guys love my graphs, so here's one about positional value relating to first round picks...

This one has:

X-axis: pick # (goes up to 32)
Y-axis: the difference in winning percentage between the teams that drafted that position and all teams that drafted at that pick #. Positive is good (your team improved more than expected for your draft position), negative is bad (your team got worse than expected).

First one is offense, second is defense.

picture hosting

**notorious** · 03-15-2013, 11:38 AM

I heard it all this morning. They are all in with Geno, now.

Demonpenz · 03-15-2013, 11:43 AM

Draft Joekel and get the season started.

Mr. Laz · 03-15-2013, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demonpenz

Draft Joekel and get the season started.

KCrockaholic · 03-15-2013, 11:44 AM

So just to make sure I'm reading that graph right... A team shouldn't take a WR early? And if you take a DE late you're bound to suck? And QB is good as long as you take him top 3 or in the 20's?

keg in kc · 03-15-2013, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Therein lies the problem.

The Anti-QB at 1.1 people have been shouting forever that the Chiefs will NEVER take a QB at 1.1. They can't admit that it's a legitimate ****ing possibility.

I'm not anti-QB at 1.1 in any way, shape or form. There are all kinds of logical, well-thought out reasons why it would make sense to do it. I would do it, had I the power. But it isn't going to happen. Because it isn't a legitimate possibility. Not for this franchise. Allowing any glimmer of hope into your mind is just opening the door for crushing disappointment in a month.

MagicHef · 03-15-2013, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCrockaholic

So just to make sure I'm reading that graph right... A team shouldn't take a WR early? And if you take a DE late you're bound to suck? And QB is good as long as you take him top 3 or in the 20's?

It's just past data. You decide how much you trust it to predict the future.

That being said, there's only one position that typically has improved the teams that have picked it very early, and has actually been picked at #1 overall before.

03-15-2013, 07:48 AM
Hoover Rufus Dawes Jr. Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $1648179	Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him but they are helping create a market for a trade. Apparently Jaws loves the kid.
Posts: 17,357

03-15-2013, 11:16 AM	#167
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	Maybe Dorsey is the 1% Maybe Dorsey is completely separating the Draft from everything else. Maybe trades,signings,cuts,salary,player history have absolutely nothing to do with what they are going to do in the draft. Then again, maybe people are just trying really hard to believe what they want to believe. Most teams give indicators of what they are going to try to do in the draft by who they cut/sign etc during the offseason. __________________ Last edited by Mr. Laz; 03-15-2013 at 11:26 AM..
Posts: 95,626

03-15-2013, 11:18 AM	#169
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1864088	If we came out and said we were seriously interested in taking Geno at 1, nobody would call to trade up. I think there is a real chance we draft Geno IF nobody offers a good trade down haul. __________________ Dreams do come true... http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=1407
Posts: 47,129

03-15-2013, 11:33 AM	#174
MagicHef The Seated Villain Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle Casino cash: $2460247	I know you guys love my graphs, so here's one about positional value relating to first round picks... This one has: X-axis: pick # (goes up to 32) Y-axis: the difference in winning percentage between the teams that drafted that position and all teams that drafted at that pick #. Positive is good (your team improved more than expected for your draft position), negative is bad (your team got worse than expected). First one is offense, second is defense. picture hosting picture hosting
Posts: 10,538

03-15-2013, 11:38 AM	#175
notorious Supporter Join Date: May 2005 Location: Who knows? Casino cash: $2915884	I heard it all this morning. They are all in with Geno, now.
Posts: 83,388

03-15-2013, 11:43 AM	#176
Demonpenz I got Rice cookin in the micro Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Apartment "G UNIT!" Casino cash: $3112136	Draft Joekel and get the season started. __________________
Posts: 54,273

03-15-2013, 11:44 AM	#178
KCrockaholic Sarcasm Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $4772900	So just to make sure I'm reading that graph right... A team shouldn't take a WR early? And if you take a DE late you're bound to suck? And QB is good as long as you take him top 3 or in the 20's?
Posts: 21,133